Connoisseurs of youth

Unread post by **of deafness** » 26 Feb 2024, 08:35

Hello. I am looking for connoisseurs of youth and beauty. I will be happy to communicate with lovers of pedoerotica.

Unread post by **Jolly Roger** » 26 Feb 2024, 08:52

karlikin: 26 Feb 2024, 08:35 Hello. I am looking for connoisseurs of youth and beauty. I will be happy to communicate with lovers of pedo-erotica.

There is no need to confuse eroticism with pedophilia. These are two completely different things. Erotica is beautiful and exciting. And the article is for pedophilia. And as for me, for some reason she is very loyal to those who do such things.

Unread post by **of deafness** » 26 Feb 2024, 09:10

It is clearly said - erotica.
You confuse salty with green
No one forces or rapes anyone

Unread post by **Jolly Roger** » 26 Feb 2024, 09:20

karlikin: 26 Feb 2024, 09:10 No one forces or rapes anyone

So the trouble is that children at that age do not need to be raped. They will follow "uncle" anyway. For the candy, for the "let me down in the car", for the promise to show me something. A puppy or a kitten, for example.
Children, due to their age, do not understand that they can try hard, they do not realize that they can do "bad", especially adults.
This is the hidden problem that You can do “very bad” things to a child, and the girl or boy won’t even understand that various nasty things were done to them.

Unread post by **Rainmaker** » 26 Feb 2024, 09:24

Jolly Roger: 26 Feb 2024, 09:20
karlikin: 26 Feb 2024, 09:10 No one forces or rapes anyone
So that’s the trouble, that children at that age and there is no need to force. They will follow "uncle" anyway. For the candy, for the "let me down in the car", for the promise to show me something. A puppy or a kitten, for example.
Children, due to their age, do not understand that they can try hard, they do not realize that they can do "bad", especially adults.
This is the hidden problem that You can do "very bad" things to a child, and the girl or boy will not even understand that various nasty things were done to them.

I completely share yours views, but, alas, it is useless to explain anything to these people. They are looking only for justifications for their criminal tastes. The set of arguments is more or less the same: “they mature much earlier than is commonly believed,” “but Nabokov,” and “back in ancient Greece.”

Unread post by **of deafness** » 26 Feb 2024, 11:28

Every time I read the moral teachings of fighters for high morality, I ask myself: what are they doing on this forum? So, of course, they don’t understand that someone gets an erection at the sight of a young and underage body. Then what causes them to get an erection, I have to ask myself (and them, and you)? Having looked through the headings of the proposed topics, I come to the conclusion with disgust that they have animals, old women, men, anal passive sex with same-sex individuals (as an option - a woman ramming their pedo-fighting anuses with a dildo), and, like the cherry on the cake, copulation with her an elderly mother or daughters, but God forbid that the daughters of these Dartagnans were minors!! They do not write angry, accusatory comments about sexual intercourse with adult family members.
My summary - you are not Dartagnan gentlemen, you are hypocrites. It’s elementary, Watson!

Unread post by **Rainmaker** » 26 Feb 2024, 12:51

karlikin: 26 Feb 2024, 11:28 Every time I read the moral teachings of fighters for high morality, I ask myself: what are they doing on this forum? So, of course, they don’t understand that someone gets an erection at the sight of a young and underage body. Then what causes them to get an erection, I have to ask myself (and them, and you)? Having looked through the headings of the proposed topics, I come to the conclusion with disgust that they have animals, old women, men, anal passive sex with same-sex individuals (as an option - a woman ramming their pedo-fighting anuses with a dildo), and, like the cherry on the cake, copulation with her an elderly mother or daughters, but God forbid that the daughters of these Dartagnans were minors!! They do not write angry, accusatory comments about sexual intercourse with adult family members.
My summary - you are not Dartagnan gentlemen, you are hypocrites. It’s elementary, Watson!

Juggle words as much as you want. Nothing will change the fact that you are a degenerate. I? Yes, I have a lot of sexual deviations. I am not a moralist by any means. But people like you are pure, crystallized evil. And you know it yourself. That is why you are looking for salvation in vague formulations. But he’s not there.

Unread post by **of deafness** » 26 Feb 2024, 23:06

Rainmaker, I have already described you. Still a geek. Crystallized abomination. And stupid and evil. Very.
Pitiful insignificant person, juggle with your brains until they are completely overgrown with wood. And don’t forget to eat shit.

Unread post by **Truwor** » 01 Mar 2024, 16:46

And how to determine criterion of youth? An older lover friend of mine and my wife told me about my wife that if he didn’t know that she was my wife, he would have thought of her that she was not yet of age. In the novel "One Hundred Years of Solitude" the criterion of youth is very clearly defined: they tried to marry off the girl immediately after her first menstruation appeared. They didn’t count the years there, since everything happened in the equatorial zone, where there is eternal summer.