National treasure.

[Stranger]

I found an interesting bill from revolutionary Russia.
Marriage was considered a product of social inequality. With the help of marriage, the bourgeoisie secured their right to own the best women.
It was proposed to abolish marriage, and make women a public property. Every worker could use an object of national heritage.
I think the bill is very correct and should be adopted with minor modifications.

[Elf Cat]

It was proposed to abolish marriage, and make women public property.

Outdoors and incels are now proposing the same thing, because they can’t please girls, they can’t They are not interested in anything and cannot build relationships. And therefore they believe that women should give to everyone upon request, even to those who are disadvantaged.

If you are referring to a document, attach its photo here, or its name, publication date and page number (chapter, paragraph) where it is mentioned - otherwise it smacks of nonsense.

[Nastya]

I think we are talking about the decree of the Saratov Provincial Council of People’s Commissars on the abolition of private ownership of women.
This is probably the most popular project of this type on the network. Although there were plenty of other projects.

Well, yes, on the one hand, you are right that low-ranking men should not have access.
And on the other hand, what do you call the cunts who are fixated on the fidelity of their wives?

In my opinion, women should fuck you whoever can.

[Bro]

nastya, this is a fake decree, appeared on behalf of the Saratov anarchists , has nothing to do with the Soviet government. Well, except for attempts to discredit her in the eyes of ordinary people.
A hundred years have passed, and it still excites weak minds

Sent after 2 minutes 38 seconds:
Stranger, why bring this here, the Unified State Examination generation will read and seriously believe. They now teach history from movies and gossip from the Internet

[Nastya]

As far as I know, such proposals circulated in the circles of many communists, mainly Mensheviks and Trotskyists. But Lenin personally and many others were against it.
More for political reasons. They were afraid that they would not find support among the people. Moreover, in many ways they relied on the female electorate.
The renunciation of marriage and family was already planned as an element of mature communism. When society is ready for this.
But not as an obligation, but as the freedom of women to give to whomever they want.

[Bro]

nastya, but there were never such ideas, the Bolsheviks on the contrary, they advocated a lasting marriage, etc. You are confusing it with the fight for women’s rights and equality. The famous fighter and revolutionary Kollontai just believed that it was necessary to be faithful spouses but independent of each other.
And she tried to promote open relationships, "erotic friendship" "love-game" and so on, for which she was criticized and condemned.
Then they came up with all sorts of glass-of-water theories about her

[Stranger]

Yes, I don’t argue that this might be a fake. But whatever one may say, the project is not bad.
Incels have nothing to do with it.

[Elf Cat]

Stranger, but it’s the incels who are now promoting the same thing: a woman should not have a monopoly on sex, but must provide it upon request, funny situation, however, someone being unable to have a relationship, and there is no money for a prostitute, he demands the right to dispose of someone else’s body by the way, they don’t like prostitutes either, because they take money for sex, and homies and incels want to warm their pussy for free, simply because they have it.

[plena.bk]

"People’s property" is just a euphemism for state property. Look at the root. The Covid hysteria has clearly shown that your body is not your business. It doesn’t matter whether it’s for women, men or children.
Your body, property, life, death - the ruling bureaucracy owns this, not you personally. To hide this fact, you can throw in about"national property". And now, instead of “I don’t pay taxes for this,” a stupid question arises about women and sex.
Divide and conquer is not news at all.

[Elf Cat]

plena.bk, what are we going to do?
Raise a popular uprising or continue to live as is?)

[Bro]

plena.bk, I wish you good health, captain obviousness

Sent after 1 minute 33 seconds:
Gato Elfo, like Well, everything is according to plan. Let’s discuss and continue to WORK so as not to die of hunger

[Stranger]

Gato Elfo, that’s the point, that’s all These tales about alphas and clothes are invented to reinforce class inequality.
What is this stoned major alpha?
Money dad. But the proletarian cannot get out of Nikita and is forced to invest in order to be given a sniff of third-rate pussy.

[Elf Cat]

Stranger,
Alpha is not about money, this is temperament and character, money is secondary here
Have you not noticed that sometimes a poor man has no end to women, and a rich but reserved woman is only dependent on his mother’s overprotection?))

[Sibiryak89]

Alexandra Kollontai, the first minister, a woman and a diplomat... What they did with their husband, the sailor Dybenko, and their work on the "marriage" or rather its abolition, were disputes until the age of 30...
"Right" a person is given not by marriage and not by his love, but by love for your body and love for you.
Something like this sounded like her motto.

[Stranger]

Gato Elfo, yes, yes. Can a simple worker fuck a minister’s daughter?
False morality was invented for this purpose. Slut-shaming and "family values".
A simple example. Here is my wife. Beautiful.
Works as a teacher. And so she slept with the official. I immediately received a promotion. And no one cares about family values.
But if they find out that she is being passed around by hard workers, they will kick her out of work. Because she’s a whore. Family values ​​there, etc.

[Elf Cat]

Stranger,
You can be an alpha and at the same time, respect family values ​​and morals, be the one with whom every girl/woman is interested in communicating, it is not necessary to bring the matter to a change.
Sometimes looking into a woman’s eyes, even when talking about neutral topics, you can understand that she wants you, and she also sees that you see a woman in her and also don’t mind - this is called FLIRTING. But for example, you are both not free, you are married and you understand that this hookup/affair/romance will not lead to anything good and you keep your distance, that’s all.

Someone is very fixated on social media. status, and someone doesn’t give a damn about it, charisma, of course, influences the social lift and often alphas achieve success in business and affairs, but this is precisely a consequence, not a cause.

If a wife is fucked by bosses, she is a whore. If a wife is fucked by hard workers, she is still a whore! Who cares who fucks?

[Stranger]

Okay, let’s say simple Vasya is coming. He sees the oligarch’s daughter. And she is not averse and he is not averse. But ..
Because they don’t let low-status ones fuck their females.
The workers will fuck their daughter if they want. If she doesn’t give it herself, she’ll rape her and the matter will be dropped.

[Elf Cat]

Okay, let’s say simple Vasya is coming. He sees the oligarch’s daughter. And she is not averse and he is not averse. But ..
Because they don’t let low-status ones fuck their females.
The workers will fuck their daughter if they want. If she doesn’t give it up, she’ll rape you and the matter will be dropped.

I’m talking about one thing, he’s talking about another

That is, according to your logic, the aligarchs now have the right to fuck everyone, but if there were a law on the mandatory right to give at the request of a man, every man would have this right?

[Big boy]

I think this is a very correct bill and with minor modifications it is worth passing.

In the 1920s they drew posters like this: “Every Komsomol member can and should satisfy his sexual desires. Every Komsomol member is obliged to meet him halfway, otherwise she is a bourgeois." attachment]

[Stranger]

Gato Elfo, under the dictatorship of the oligarchy, this law will not be accepted. And if they accept it, it won’t work.
But if we return to communism, then this is the fundamental law.

[Elf Cat]

Gato Elfo, under the dictatorship of the oligarchy, this the law will not be passed. And if they accept it, it won’t work.
But if we go back to communism, then this is the fundamental law.

I have scrutinized such laws on my own :- D

Well, suppose such a law is passed, how will sex coupons be distributed?
Will the queue for sex be electronic or not?
How many institutes of venereology need to be built?

[a romantic]

The law can also work in the opposite direction - scary old women also want sex with young people, and a 20-year-old guy is obliged to satisfy, for harmony in society. Do you want such harmony, gentlemen?