Castration of rapists

[The passage]

Well, this is the return of the “Eye for an eye” law.

Well, who has Did the prison correct us?
Nowadays there is a video circulating on the Internet of a cook kicking a waitress. He came drunk, she reprimanded him. He kicks her in the face and asks if it hurts her. He has already been detained. He has a previous conviction. Well, now they’ll put me in prison again. Then he will serve his time and be released.
If we break his legs now. With which he beat her. He will experience severe physical pain, then lie in a cast for six months. Then he will have to learn to walk on them again for six months. Then the former fractures will remind themselves when the weather changes. I think there will never be a relapse. Well, this scum will calmly eat at public expense, and if then he doesn’t like something, he will again use violence. Rabid animals should not be treated like humans. They understand only the language of force. They don’t understand anything anymore.
And of course, prison doesn’t correct anyone.

Well, yes, you said everything correctly. But I would accept such laws with reservations. If the fact of slander is proven, then the plaintiff (plaintiff) receives all this fivefold. Well, everyone should be responsible for their actions. If it turns out during the investigation, or this castrated, allegedly rapist, proves that it was a slander, then this “plaintiff” will have her eyes gouged out, her arms and legs will be cut off, and so will false witnesses, by the way. If the case was about alleged pedophilia, then the parents of such an “injured” child bear responsibility.

The preliminary investigation and the court must bear responsibility. If there is perjury, there should be no conviction. And if there is a verdict, then they must bear five times the responsibility.
There is no smoke without fire. I don’t think a woman will accuse a man of violence if everything was wonderful and consensual. Unless she’s a fraud or a criminal. On the contrary, women more often hide the fact of violence.

[A singer]

There is no smoke without fire. I don’t think that a woman will accuse a man of violence if everything was wonderful for them

Not everything is wonderful, but there is no violence. And the girl wants revenge.
We remember Shurygina, as well as the coach who sat on the couch with the girl

[Serg_A]

Unless she is a fraudster or a criminal

That’s it.

I don’t think a woman will accuse a man of violence if everything happened It’s wonderful with them and by mutual agreement

It could have been nothing at all, we had a flight school for navigators in the city, promising guys graduated from there. Some girls after dating with such guys at the dance, filed a report against them for rape. At the same time, the guy was given a choice: either he would marry her, or there would be a trial and prison investigation. I had to get married

Sent after 1 minute 40 seconds:

The preliminary investigation and the court must bear responsibility. If there is perjury, there should be no conviction. And if there is a verdict, then they must bear fivefold responsibility.

The slanderer must be held liable for slander

[The passage]

flight school for navigators, promising guys came out of there

What is the prospect? Should I go with my husband into the darkness of a cockroach, where there is no place to study or work? Wander around the garrisons with him? Is this a prospect?

filed a complaint against them for rape

Are you 100% sure that there was no rape?

They had to get married

Why did they get married if there was no rape? A statement is not a verdict. Or were they afraid that the fact of rape would be proven?

The slanderer must be held responsible for slander

With this I Agree. Only usually the rapist is pitied, the statement is withdrawn, and the impression is created that he has been slandered. There is no need to feel sorry for rapists. Their place is in prison.

Sent after 2 minutes 54 seconds:

There is no smoke without fire. I don’t think that a woman will accuse a man of violence if everything was wonderful for them

Not everything is wonderful, but there is no violence. And the girl wants to take revenge.
We remember Shurygina, as well as the coach who sat on the couch with the girl

There is no need to remember anything. If there really was no violence, then it will be difficult to prove it in court.

[Serg_A]

What is the prospect? Should I go with my husband into the darkness of a cockroach, where there is no place to study or work? Wander around the garrisons with him? Is this a prospect?

In those days it was a good prospect, everyone tried to marry military men, especially pilots.

nSent after 1 minute 16 seconds:

Are you 100% sure that there was no rape?

Some people managed to prove the opposite.

[Serg_A]

Why did they get married if there was no rape? A statement is not a verdict. Or were they afraid that the fact of rape would be proven?

Counter question, would you marry your rapist?

[The passage]

Why did they get married if there was no rape? A statement is not a verdict. Or were they afraid that the fact of rape would be proven?

Counter question, would you marry your rapist?

In my case, the rapist had an accident. First they tried to accuse me of slander, and then of premeditated murder.

They marry rapists when love is most likely. She loves him and he’s a jerk, but she thinks he’s not really like that or will improve. They need to be asked why they are doing this. Someone else’s soul in the dark.
I didn’t divorce my alcoholic husband because I loved him. I believed in him. Love is evil.

[Metatropism]

If they beat you, then you need to defend yourself. If they call you names, then don’t communicate with such people.
Were you offended? It was necessary to play sports.

But defending yourself would offend the girl, and you can’t offend girls
Don’t communicate? She may stalk him or spread rumors among his classmates. Will non-communication be enough?
So you are for a forceful solution to the conflict? Who is stronger is right?

[|_rarely_|]

Marinka, you are so bloodthirsty. But in democratic countries (some) the situation is viewed from a different angle

You need to register to see the link.

[career]

You need to register to see the link.

она не кровожадная, она с психической травмой, и пережитое изнасилование и инвалидность накладывают на психику человека определённые измененния, так что все её сообщения надо читать со скидкой, что у человека скажем так не всё в порядке с головой

[Bully Carrie]

not everything is right in the head

How can we try to communicate without crossing that fine line where banter turns into insults to the participants? Is it possible, what do you think?

[career]

not everything is right in the head

How can you try to communicate so as not to cross that fine line, where does the banter turn into insults to the participants? Is it possible, what do you think?

this is not an insult, this is my conclusion - this is the result of reading her statements

[WazzzzzzzUp]

let’s say that a person is not all right with his head

According to my conclusion, you are not all right with your head. But it’s none of my business, nor is it your business, why a person has a position different from yours. If you hadn’t written this in relation to another person, I wouldn’t have pointed it out either, but yes, I also read your posts, making allowances.

[career]

so yes, I also read your posts, making a discount.

you are doing the right thing

[The passage]

uran, ))) You are my good one))) You are writing in this thread both from registered accounts and as an unregistered one. I would give you an order for such vigorous activity. But, I don’t have an order. Do you want a certificate of honor, I can buy it at the stationery store and sign it for you? But all your nicknames under which you registered in this topic will not fit on it. What a shame. In general, I express my verbal gratitude to you)))

[|_rarely_|]

Marinka, be honest, are you a mod? It’s just that you are so actively catching duplicate users that one conclusion suggests itself - you see IP addresses. You’re burning)) Or maybe even an admin?

Only cheesy! You can PM me

[WazzzzzzzUp]

Marinka, be honest, are you a mod? It’s just that you are so actively catching duplicate users that one conclusion suggests itself - you see IP addresses. You’re burning)) Or maybe even an admin?

Only cheesy! You can PM

I don’t read everything and not as often as I would like. But even I understand that some people are using more than one account. Same narrative, same mistakes, same ideas. Of course, I don’t notice it as often as Marinka, but still I see. There is a possibility that the person has better developed analysis than me, or he is really an admin

[|_rarely_|]

The same story, the same mistakes, the same ideas.

What’s the point of having several accounts then? I thought, since you multiply into accounts, then imitate different users. Not?

[career]

uran, ))) You are mine good))) You are writing in this thread both from registered accounts and as an unregistered one. I would give you an order for such vigorous activity. But, I don’t have an order. Do you want a certificate of honor, I can buy it at the stationery store and sign it for you? But all your nicknames under which you registered in this topic will not fit on it. What a shame. In general, I express my verbal gratitude to you)))

don’t be offended, but your mental problems really show through in every message you make about rape, it’s very strongly felt that it touches you

[The passage]

uran, ) )) You are my good one))) You are writing in this thread both from registered accounts and as an unregistered one. I would give you an order for such vigorous activity. But, I don’t have an order. Do you want a certificate of honor, I can buy it at the stationery store and sign it for you? But all your nicknames under which you registered in this topic will not fit on it. What a shame. In general, I express my verbal gratitude to you)))

don’t be offended, but your mental problems really show through in every message you make about rape, it’s very strongly felt that it touches you

))) Ahah))) I’m not offended by you. I wrote to you that they don’t take offense at fools
Please note that I did not call you a fool and will never call you.

nSent after 15 minutes 9 seconds:

Marinka, be honest, are you a mod? It’s just that you are so actively catching duplicate users that one conclusion suggests itself - you see IP addresses. You’re burning)) Or maybe even an admin?

Only cheesy! You can PM

))) Ahah, I already wrote recently. No, I’m not an admin.

[career]

Only all your nicknames, under which you registered in this topic, will not fit on it.

can you name 2-3-5 of my left accounts, and I’ll tell you guessed it or not?

[The passage]

Only all your nicknames, under which you registered in this topic, will not fit on it.

maybe you can name 2-3-5 of mine left accounts, and I’ll tell you whether you guessed right or not?

))) Ahah. You are my good I can name them all for you in this thread))) But I won’t. Let this be our secret with you)))

[WazzzzzzzUp]

I thought that since you multiply into accounts, then imitate different users.

Also I think so. But either people don’t give a damn, or they don’t understand that they are writing the same thing... And I also don’t understand why, even if it’s very good to pretend to be someone.

[Beluga]

The question of punishment, especially physical punishment, or as they say here, mutilation is always a difficult matter.

A judicial error is inevitable, and if the punishment for an error is made more severe, the effect may be the opposite, so as not to get burned in milk blow on the water.

And besides a mistake, there can always be an order from above, and then the person cannot be returned

[career]

Я тебе могу их все назвать в этой теме

ну что ж! вот мои аккаунты:
Джювли, Обряды, Rubahaparen, lubitel69, Wild Eskimo, Флекс, Byutiful, |_retko_|, Белуха, wiginmakgreger,

[Beluga]

ну что ж! вот мои аккаунты:
Джювли, Обряды, Rubahaparen, lubitel69, Wild Eskimo, Флекс, Byutiful, |_retko_|, Белуха, wiginmakgreger,

тогда у тебя раздвоение личности точнее у меня

[The passage]

Belukha, he’s just joking now.

[Beluga]

Belukha, he’s just joking now.

Oh, and me? I guess I’m not kidding

[Serg_A]

ну что ж! вот мои аккаунты:
Джювли, Обряды, Rubahaparen, lubitel69, Wild Eskimo, Флекс, Byutiful, |_retko_|, Белуха, wiginmakgreger,

Белуха, он просто шутит сейчас.

Меня в списке нет, вай вай вай! Что ж я буду делать !

[Serg_A]

Why did they get married if there was no rape? A statement is not a verdict. Or were they afraid that the fact of rape would be proven?

Counter question, would you marry your rapist?

In my case, the rapist had an accident. First they tried to accuse me of slander, and then of premeditated murder.

They marry rapists when love is most likely. She loves him and he’s a jerk, but she thinks he’s not really like that or will improve. They need to be asked why they are doing this. Someone else’s soul in the dark.
I didn’t divorce my alcoholic husband because I loved him. I believed in him. Love is evil.

I support you emotionally, if I came across a scumbag who attacked my wife (she recently admitted to me that in her youth she was courted by a handsome a guy who turned out to be a sadist, and she miraculously escaped from him, he managed to inflict several wounds on her) I would have started by breaking all his fingers, and then, if he had not died from pain, I would have left crazy about her, and would become a vegetable. I have an extreme hatred for such people.
On the other hand, I cannot stand it when a person who is not a rapist, thief, or murderer is persecuted.
For example, the case of Strauss Kahn (which I am not I sympathize), he once proposed the formation of a new banking system throughout the world. And, lo and behold, when he began to promote his ideas, some kind of "raped" maid immediately appeared, who put an end to his career.
Or there was such an athlete Shawn Rhoden, whom someone simply got out of the way , a little-known athlete suddenly found herself "raped." The court, by the way, did not prove anything, but his life went downhill. Someone was responsible for this, but no one.
Or, when Till fell off the stage because he lost consciousness while being carried, he grabbed (or groped) two women by the legs. They immediately opened a case against him, although to the credit of these two women, when the “good” feminists came to them with these cases, they simply told them to fuck off.
Watch the French film "Headbutt", it’s just about this, maybe some thoughts will appear.

[|_rarely_|]

For example, the case of Strauss Kahn (whom I do not sympathize with), he once proposed the formation of a new banking system throughout the world. And, lo and behold, when he began to promote his ideas, some kind of "raped" maid immediately appeared, who put an end to his career.
Or there was such an athlete Shawn Rhoden, whom someone simply got out of the way , a little-known athlete suddenly found herself "raped." The court, by the way, did not prove anything, but his life went downhill. Someone was responsible for this, but no one.

These are typical maneuvers of the American elite to eliminate undesirables.

[Serg_A]

For example, the case of Strauss Kahn (whom I do not sympathize with), he once proposed forming a new banking system throughout the world. And, lo and behold, when he began to promote his ideas, some kind of "raped" maid immediately appeared, who put an end to his career.
Or there was such an athlete Shawn Rhoden, whom someone simply got out of the way , a little-known athlete suddenly found herself "raped." The court, by the way, did not prove anything, but his life went downhill. Someone was responsible for this, but no one.

These are typical maneuvers of the American elite to eliminate undesirables.

Well, yes, and not only American, by the way. We must not give these elites another opportunity to deal with people.

[career]

Marinka, that’s it, has the topic of rapists become uninteresting to you?

[◊_NeBo[_Na_]LaDoNi_◊]

Counter question, would you marry your rapist?

In my case with a rapist There has been an accident. First they tried to accuse me of slander, and then of premeditated murder.

They marry rapists when love is most likely. She loves him and he’s a jerk, but she thinks he’s not really like that or will improve. They need to be asked why they are doing this. Someone else’s soul in the dark.
I didn’t divorce my alcoholic husband because I loved him. I believed in him. Love is evil.

I support you emotionally, if I came across a scumbag who attacked my wife (she recently admitted to me that in her youth she was courted by a handsome a guy who turned out to be a sadist, and she miraculously escaped from him, he managed to inflict several wounds on her) I would have started by breaking all his fingers, and then, if he had not died from pain, I would have left crazy about her, and would become a vegetable. I have an extreme hatred for such people.
On the other hand, I cannot stand it when a person who is not a rapist, thief, or murderer is persecuted.
For example, the case of Strauss Kahn (which I am not I sympathize), he once proposed the formation of a new banking system throughout the world. And, lo and behold, when he began to promote his ideas, some kind of "raped" maid immediately appeared, who put an end to his career.
Or there was such an athlete Shawn Rhoden, whom someone simply got out of the way , a little-known athlete suddenly found herself "raped." The court, by the way, did not prove anything, but his life went downhill. Someone was responsible for this, but no one.
Or, when Till fell off the stage because he lost consciousness while being carried, he grabbed (or groped) two women by the legs.

Till in Germany in general besieged from all sides, accused of several sex scandals, starting back in 2020, when Rammstein had concerts in Russia and ending with the current times because of Shelby Lynn, who first reported that she was abused, and now she herself was lost in her testimony.

[Serg_A]

In my case, the rapist had an accident. First they tried to accuse me of slander, and then of premeditated murder.

They marry rapists when love is most likely. She loves him and he’s a jerk, but she thinks he’s not really like that or will improve. They need to be asked why they are doing this. Someone else’s soul in the dark.
I didn’t divorce my alcoholic husband because I loved him. I believed in him. Love is evil.

I support you emotionally, if I came across a scumbag who attacked my wife (she recently admitted to me that in her youth she was courted by a handsome a guy who turned out to be a sadist, and she miraculously escaped from him, he managed to inflict several wounds on her) I would have started by breaking all his fingers, and then, if he had not died from pain, I would have left crazy about her, and would become a vegetable. I have an extreme hatred for such people.
On the other hand, I cannot stand it when a person who is not a rapist, thief, or murderer is persecuted.
For example, the case of Strauss Kahn (which I am not I sympathize), he once proposed the formation of a new banking system throughout the world. And, lo and behold, when he began to promote his ideas, some kind of "raped" maid immediately appeared, who put an end to his career.
Or there was such an athlete Shawn Rhoden, whom someone simply got out of the way , a little-known athlete suddenly found herself "raped." The court, by the way, did not prove anything, but his life went downhill. Someone was responsible for this, but no one.
Or, when Till fell off the stage because he lost consciousness while being carried, he grabbed (or groped) two women by the legs.

Till in Germany in general besieged from all sides, accused of several sex scandals, starting back in 2020, when Rammstein had concerts in Russia and ending with the current times because of Shelby Lynn, who first reported that she was violated, and now she herself was lost in her testimony.

In general, if you think about it, at least they wouldn’t disgrace themselves - besides Till has fans lining up in line, why should he stoop to this idiocy?
By the way, Shawn Rhoden had the same thing, complete stupidity in the presence of a bunch of fans to climb on someone himself.