Does an admin exist?

[◊_NeBo[_Na_]LaDoNi_◊]

but you are not like that, you are of course something special

you know, I think that you agree that most of the topics on the forum are wretched, the posts are primitive..) but tease the person who voiced this..))

I’m not teasing.. she just forgot to write at the end that she is just as “poor” as she put it.. it’s strange to sit in a dung heap, eat dung and sharply deny that she was not involved in it
Most of the topics are strange.. but there are those that I love)
Do you agree with Sveta on everything?

[Pierro]

do you agree with Sveta on everything?

You saw in her message disdain for the others, and.. reacted..
And I saw in this reaction your emotions.. human.. I like to understand that behind the avatar there is a living person.. that’s why I quoted..))

[Venus]

You can’t harass anyone. Neither for children nor for adults.

this is not the answer.
Now the poet will come and tell you.

This is the answer. I have posted topics about violence on this forum more than once, but most came there to make fun of me. Topics about specific acts of violence and not serious punishment. But such people react to fantasies with all seriousness.

[Pierro]

each of those who spoke out is right in some way... in their own way...

no.

but bans won’t solve anything.. .

this is also not true.

[Venus]

each of those who spoke out is right in some way... in their own way...

no.

but prohibitions are nothing can’t be solved...

and this is also not true.

What can solve with bans?

[Pierro]

And the member is being discussed very actively.

the pyramid of shit on the avatar will be discussed.. even more actively..)

Sent after 1 minute 51 seconds:

What can be solved by bans?

everything..
in this world everything is determined by prohibitions, boundaries.
culture is a system of restrictions.
this is what civilization is based on. .))
don’t argue with me, I ask you..))

Sent after 1 minute 2 seconds:

And I’m pleased)

fu-fu-fu !!))

[Venus]

And the member is being discussed very actively.

the pyramid of shit on the avatar will be discussed.. even more actively..)
n
Sent after 1 minute 51 seconds:

What can be solved by bans?

everything..
in this world everything is determined by prohibitions, boundaries.
culture is a system of restrictions.
on this is to stick to civilization..))
don’t argue with me, I ask you..))

Culture is the achievements of humanity, and prohibitions are a hindrance.

[Hair shirt]

Strecoza, do you have children?

Again you are getting personal. You really are like that old woman on the bench near the entrance.
We are all here discussing abstract problems not applied to the individual. This is the best way not to quarrel with anyone.
And vice versa - the best way to quarrel is to start asking the person something personal, and then accordingly start discussing it and take the courage to judge whether it is right or wrong.
You are actually some kind of provocateur. Why do you need this? Is this what you come here for?
Does it make you feel better?

[Pierro]

Culture is the achievements of humanity, and prohibitions are a brake.

of course)
and these frameworks (brakes) make it possible for the peaceful coexistence of carriers of this cultural code, pass this skill on to the next generations..))
in a word, ensure stability..the evolutionary development that you value so much..))

or what? as usual?))
shwabodaaa!!! schwabooodaaaaaa!!!

[Sorcerer]

Does this make you feel better?

I know for sure that reading you makes me feel worse)

[Venus]

Culture is the achievements of humanity, and prohibitions are a brake.

of course)
and these frameworks (brakes) give the possibility of calm coexistence of carriers of a given cultural code, passing on this skill to next generations..))
in a word, they ensure stability.. the evolutionary development that you so value..))

or what ? as usual?))
shwabodaaa!!! shabooodaaaaa!!!

Evolution is a very slow process, unlike progress. Progress is in principle incompatible with prohibitions. Bans mean stagnation at best and regression at worst.

[Pierro]

We are all here discussing abstract problems not applied to the individual.

and right there:

You are actually some kind of provocateur. Why do you need this? Is this what you come here for?
Does it make you feel better?

bgg)))
lovely!! continue!!))

Sent after 5 minutes 5 seconds:
Strecoza, I’m not interested.
well, it’s true.
I don’t want to prove obvious things.

[Venus]

We are all here discussing abstract problems not applied to the individual.

and right there:

You are actually some kind of provocateur. Why do you need this? Is this what you come here for?
Does it make you feel better?

bgg)))
lovely!! continue!!))

Sent after 5 minutes 5 seconds:
Strecoza, I’m not interested.
well, really.
I don’t want to prove obvious things.

))) Correct I don’t want to write, but I can’t prove it)))

[Hair shirt]

Pedophilia is not only punishable, but also from the point of view of morality and conscience is unnatural. If you think this is the norm, then sit there, sniffling in two holes, and hold your tongue, which is beginning to rot, behind your teeth and wait for them to come for you, or on the street, a feather in the ribs.

Where and in what place did I justify pedophilia? I can also write that you are justifying pedophilia. And then you sit and wash yourself away from this shit. Prove that this is not so.
All that I wrote above is that there is no need to take on the functions of justice. Do you want to become a judge? Go get a legal education and become this judge with all that it entails. With the body supervising your activities - the prosecutor’s office. And with all the pros and cons of this work.
But what you shouldn’t do is to judge someone and point something out to someone just like that, without having any right to do so.
What I like about Moscow, unlike any other Russian cities, is that all this crap doesn’t take root in Moscow. When a city is divided into areas where teenagers jealously watch who is doing what in their area. Where each entrance has its own tenant with an active lifestyle. Where half the entrance cares about you and everyone strives to teach you what you should do or not do.

In Moscow, all this does not exist. The grandmothers on the benches near the entrances do not take root - they do not receive moral support from the residents. They would love these money, but no one shares anything with them. And he doesn’t carry on a conversation with them, and doesn’t tell these grandmothers either about himself or about his neighbors. And the neighbors themselves practically don’t know each other either. And they don’t want to do it. No one comes to anyone’s doorstep with pies to actually consider everything about how you live and then discuss this matter with someone on a bench near the entrance.

And I think this is not because Muscovites such dicks. And simply because these all Muscovites are yesterday’s residents of the province. And they gulped down all this crap in their Tula and Volgograd to the fullest. And having arrived in Moscow, they no longer want to get involved in all this crap and allow someone to meddle in their personal life.
And by the way, because of this, there is no street teenage crime at all in the Moscow districts. That is, there is simply absolutely no bullshit. You won’t believe it, but it’s true. And all because there is no such crap in the form of patriotism for one’s region. Like someone else came into our area - who is he? What are you doing here?

You won’t believe it, but this is absolutely not the case. And because of this, every district of Moscow is safe, despite the migrant workers and the fact that there are many visitors to the city.
And no one goes to fight yard to yard or district to district.

Sent after 9 minutes 1 second:

are you conducting an interrogation? I’m not in your psychiatrist’s office. Read the subtext in what is written, there is no hint of calls or that this is good and should be done. The topic is about the past, under the USSR)) and so on. You have verbiage, an indicative tone, as if you are the admin here and tell people what to do, where to go, where not to go, what to read or not read. I’m like the boss, don’t read if you don’t like it. It’s not for you to tell what to do and it’s not for you to shut your mouth, not to let people express their opinions. But if you say that you really are the owner of the resource, then it’s a different matter. I don’t want to have any further conversation with you, since you are slippery, trying to get out at the expense of others.

Yeah, so sex with minors in Soviet times doesn’t count? That is, you first write that you had sex with adults during the USSR and then immediately propose to burn at the stake this or that pedophile on this forum.
You first undertake to judge everyone here on this forum, and then you immediately write that visitors cannot be told what they should do and what they should not do.
This is your verbiage.
I’d better add your nickname in the settings to enemies so that I don’t see your posts in the future. And don’t be fooled by your posts and don’t waste your time.

[Sorcerer]

So sex with minors in Soviet times doesn’t count? That is, you first write that you had sex with adults during the USSR and then immediately propose to burn at the stake this or that pedophile on this forum.

yes, I jerked off in your mother’s belly, you cardboard fool. I didn’t read your post about psychological castration in your post above. This is just kind of fucked up. You are our writer, I was 2 years old in the USSR and the collapse of the USSR, I didn’t even have a dick then.

[Hair shirt]

Yes, I jerked off in my mother’s stomach, you cardboard fool. I didn’t read your post about psychological castration in your post above. This is just kind of fucked up. You are our writer, I was 2 years old in the USSR and the collapse of the USSR, I didn’t even have a dick then.

That’s it. I added you as an enemy in the settings. I won’t see your posts anymore.
In general, I noticed that there are people who, for some reason, really need to inflate their psyche from time to time.
That is, they seem to like this pre-conflict state. It is familiar to them and they feel good in this state.
And they are very comfortable communicating with anyone, bringing communication to such a pre-conflict state.

I have noticed such weakness in Caucasians. They transform any unusual and uncomfortable communication into such a pre-conflict state.
For Caucasians, perhaps this state is normal and natural. They kind of consider themselves warriors. But for an ordinary person who is not from the Caucasus, he begins to twitch when he finds himself in such a situation. And accordingly, they lose in communication, argument, in the process of conducting some kind of negotiations about something.

And Caucasians win because people are not able to withstand this tense state for a long time. Because it is uncomfortable for them and requires additional mental resources. Well, again, people are afraid that now all this will escalate into a fight in which they will obviously lose.
Well, in general, I want to say that all this is done by a specialist - a nervous situation, hidden threats, a promise to someone to expand the point.
I think we should just stop all this right away and not get into lengthy conversations with such visitors.
Someone calls such visitors trolls. But I don’t like this label because almost immediately everyone began to be called trolls. What’s wrong is that they immediately call you a troll.
Therefore, this is not trolling. It’s just that a person has some problems and for some reason he needs all this. All this scandalous communication is about nothing.
And it’s easier to just cross to the other side of the street than to enter into all these dialogues.

[Sorcerer]

Oh, that’s it, Dragonfly, take your patient and lock him in the ward, first injecting him with chlorpromazine and galaperidol. Fucked me up with my antlerless eloquence. Shitty writer, he upset me that I’m not his friend. Were you once a friend? I do not remember. Do I have amnesia? No.

[Fargal94]

Sackcloth, would you be so kind as to open your page so that I could make you one of my enemies.

[March]

would you be so kind as to open your page so that I can add you to my enemies.

Why do you need a page? You just copy the nickname and paste it into the dialog box in your personal section - the "friends and foes" tab.
Ordinary copy-paste. Easily.

[Fargal94]

Would you be so kind as to open your page so that I can add you to my enemies.

Why do you need a page? You just copy the nickname and paste it into the dialog box in your personal section - the "friends and foes" tab.
Ordinary copy-paste. Easy.

thanks, helped

[Rainmaker]

You need to register to see the link.
Бляааааа....

[Fargal94]

Rainmaker, why such a strong reaction? On my illiteracy or another opus of Hair Shirt?

[Eustace]

the next opus of Hair Shirt?

Stuffy!!! I’m sorry, I’ve made you a nightmare here

[Rainmaker]

Rainmaker, why such a strong reaction ? On my illiteracy or another opus of Hair Shirt?

No, no. In general, I was sick of the versatility of the fucked up topic. Here you have personal insults and philosophical fabrications and passions for the dick on your avatar.

I remembered a joke:

Jesus arrived on earth in our time. I visited churches and returned to heaven. He comes to his father, that is, God, and says: "Dad, do you remember I founded a fishing circle on earth 2000 years ago? You won’t believe how they grew..."

P. S still wouldn’t start a theosophical discussion in this topic.

[Venus]

Rainmaker, on What is this violent reaction? On my illiteracy or another opus of Hair Shirt?

No, no. In general, I was sick of the versatility of the fucked up topic. Here you have personal insults and philosophical fabrications and passions for the dick on your avatar.

I remembered a joke:

Jesus arrived on earth in our time. I visited churches and returned to heaven. He comes to his father, that is, God, and says: "Dad, do you remember I founded a fishing circle on earth 2000 years ago? You won’t believe how they grew..."

P. It would be wrong to start a theosophical discussion in this topic.

The feelings of believers are the first feelings that are prohibited from insulting in our country. This is a continuation of the discussion about breaking the law. In real life, it’s better not to tell such jokes and not to mention God in vain, otherwise you’ll have to take out a loan to pay the fine. Our fines for such offenses are huge.

[King Bird]

Culture is the achievements of mankind, and prohibitions are a brake.

and these frameworks (brakes) make it possible for the carriers of this cultural code to peacefully coexist , pass on this skill to the next generations..))
in a word, they ensure sustainability..the evolutionary development that you value so much..))

Not so everything is clear. There are some elements of so-called “culture” that for one reason or another do not fit into the paradigm of society, due, for example, to conflict with criminal codes. Cannibalism or pedophilia. Reasonable people do not argue with this, although at some stage in the development of society this was the norm. Until we started talking about human rights and everything that is loved in democracies and hated in authoritarian regimes.

And there is also a separate category of prohibitions, which is precisely a brake, not included in conflict with laws. But only because some manifestations of cultural development suddenly began to irritate the subjects embodying one or another authoritarian regime. Due to personal hostility towards the bearers of culture, impotence, senile insanity, etc. Or, as an option, the imposition of prohibitions by religious denominations not only on their adherents, but also on the entire society, which also consists of representatives of another faith (religion) or atheists in general.

ZY. The fashionable phrase "cancel culture" is nonsense and catachresis.

[Venus]

Culture is the achievements of mankind, and prohibitions are a brake.

and these frames ( brakes) make it possible for the carriers of a given cultural code to peacefully coexist, to pass on this skill to the next generations..))
in a word, they ensure stability.. the evolutionary development that you value so much..))

It’s not so clear. There are some elements of so-called “culture” that for one reason or another do not fit into the paradigm of society, due, for example, to conflict with criminal codes. Cannibalism or pedophilia. Reasonable people do not argue with this, although at some stage in the development of society this was the norm. Until we started talking about human rights and everything that is loved in democracies and hated in authoritarian regimes.

And there is also a separate category of prohibitions, which is precisely a brake, not included in conflict with laws. But only because some manifestations of cultural development suddenly began to irritate the subjects embodying one or another authoritarian regime. Due to personal hostility towards the bearers of culture, impotence, senile insanity, etc. Or, as an option, the imposition of prohibitions by religious denominations not only on their adherents, but also on the entire society, which also consists of representatives of another faith (religion) or atheists in general.

ZY. The fashionable phrase "cancel culture" is nonsense and catachresis.

Any ban is a method of manipulation and nothing more. A person must have a choice.

[King Bird]

Any ban is a method of manipulation and nothing more. A person should have a choice.

Is it not clear about criminality? Let’s say you and I know, even without the criminal code, that killing and stealing are unacceptable. And we will not do this. But you and I know that our society is sick, and that it is full of representatives who in this regard are restrained only by the framework of prohibitions. There is no point in talking about choice in this situation.

And regarding fashion trends - yes. A primitive example - there should be a choice of which concert to go to - the Cossack folk choir, the group "Rammstein" or (be it mentioned late at night) Lolita or Gazmanov. And it’s not like there’s only a folk Cossack choir or Gazmanov, and the rest is nothing.

[Venus]

Any ban is a method of manipulation and nothing more. A person should have a choice.

Is it not clear about criminality? Let’s say you and I know, even without the criminal code, that killing and stealing are unacceptable. And we will not do this. But you and I know that our society is sick, and that it is full of representatives who in this regard are restrained only by the framework of prohibitions. There is no point in talking about choice in this situation.

And regarding fashion trends - yes. A primitive example - there should be a choice of which concert to go to - the Cossack folk choir, the group "Rammstein" or (be it mentioned late at night) Lolita or Gazmanov. And it’s not that only the people’s Cossack choir or Gazmanov, and the rest is nothing.

The fact is that the Criminal Code has no influence on whether a murderer will kill or not. Whether a thief will steal or not. On the contrary, we have such punishments for crimes that they do not frighten or deter either a murderer or a thief. Although of course they could. If the punishment were severe and then a person would have a choice. For example, if they were executed for murder, then the potential killer would think a million times.
Well, other prohibitions are not a means of preventing something. You can’t smoke on the train, but you can light a cigarette, and if you get caught, you have to pay a fine. You can’t steal from a store, but you can steal and if you get caught, you have to pay a fine. You can’t drive through a red light, but you can...
We need to educate people so that they make the right choice, and if you punish for something, then so that the person also has a choice not to violate it, because the punishment very serious.

[Bully Carrie]

It’s not that there’s only a folk Cossack choir or Gazmanov, and the rest is nothing.

Well, by the way, that’s how it is now , if that’s the case...

[King Bird]

On the contrary, we have such punishments for crimes that they do not frighten or deter either a murderer or a thief. Although of course they could. If the punishment were severe and then a person would have a choice. For example, if they were executed for murder, then the potential killer would think a million times.

For murder, and even with aggravating ones, they will give 12-18 years, and the conditions of detention will be even those. And as the experience of many countries shows, the death penalty is not a deterrent. For shoplifting, by the way, you are not fined, but given a prison term. There is always a choice not to break the law, and in a normal society it takes place. Even abnormal in most cases.

Well, by the way, this is how it is now, if it really is...

Because the situation now is abnormal. And society too, so-so.

[Tanya]

Strecoza, well, there is pedophilia, even though it is criminal punishable, and they just saw the topic of pedophiles and immediately ban them like any other committing criminal acts. You know, I can understand and forgive a murderer, but I will never understand or forgive a pedophile and a rapist. And thank God in the zones they are also not understood or forgiven, and their life there is hell on earth.

[Xenophon]

And the member is being discussed very actively.

the pyramid of shit on the avatar will be discussed.. even more actively..)
nThere is no arguing about tastes.

[Catkir46]

People))) I’m tormented by a question about the forum)) I’ve actually written 75 messages, but the forum seems to have 65)) And the topic is not simple))) We can say that the end of virginity will soon come on this forum)) and I’ll be able to at least see something) )) Will there be some information from the forum about the fact that the restrictions have been lifted? And of course the question is about the quantity (inconsistency))

Sorry, what’s on this topic)) I don’t want to raise a morbid topic)) Then go stammer for her)))

[red_fox]

Culture is the achievements of humanity, and prohibitions are a hindrance.

You are talking rubbish. Thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not steal are also prohibitions. Laws are also prohibitions. Do you want to live without restrictions - in the taiga, in the jungle, etc.

[Dmitriy234]

The fact is that the Criminal Code does not in any way affect whether the killer will kill or not. Will a thief steal or not

You have too good an opinion of people if you think that now everyone does what they want and the Criminal Code does not restrain anyone))))

[Venus]

For murder, and even with aggravating ones, they will give 12-18 years,

They used to give it, but now it’s more often 9 years and less.

For shoplifting, by the way, you are not fined, but given a term

I can look up which of the amount stolen from the store, a criminal case is being opened, but I’m lazy. Look for it yourself. Then open the article itself and the punishments under it, and then look at the cases. They put one in ten thousand in jail for a real prison term.

And as the experience of many countries shows, the death penalty is not a deterrent.

What is your experience? Which countries?

Sent after 2 minutes 43 seconds:

Culture is the achievements of humanity, and prohibitions are a hindrance.

You are talking bullshit. Thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not steal are also prohibitions. Laws are also prohibitions. If you want to live without prohibitions, go to the taiga, the jungle, etc.

)))) Laws are not prohibitions. You first think and then write

Sent after 3 minutes 45 seconds:

The fact is that the Criminal Code does not in any way affect whether the killer will kill or not. Will a thief steal or not

You have too good an opinion of people if you think that now everyone does what they want and the Criminal Code does not restrain anyone)))) n

))) If we called you now, you would not be able to tell me the articles of our Criminal Code. Like most of those present here, on this forum. Well, except for professional lawyers. How can something that we have no idea about be contained?

[Gourmet]

I suck at this zoo (I’m not talking about pedophilia). And about pedophilia... well, one unbalanced guy fucked a girl at the age of 13... and who hasn’t dreamed of it? Poke me in the eye

[Pierro]

Poke me in the eye

fucking?)

[Tanya]

I suck at this zoo (I’m not talking about pedophilia). And about pedophilia... well, one unbalanced guy fucked a girl at the age of 13... and who hasn’t dreamed of it? Poke me in the eye

Only pedophiles dream about this. A normal man does not dream of fucking children.

Sent after 2 minutes 31 seconds:
Strecoza, and Arab countries Women are stoned to death for adultery... and they know it, and yet they still carry out such executions regularly. In China, bribery is punishable by death and is carried out regularly. To answer your question, the experience of which countries proves that the death penalty does not mean zero crimes punishable by it. And they can give 5 years for murder... in 1992 we tried a man who shot thief in law Screw with a machine gun.. ( the trial was going on in the courtroom next to my office and the defendant’s lawyer came to us to drink tea during breaks), so for this... they gave 5 years, they took into account the identity of the victim, they say the forest orderly... (he was killed in the zone, of course)

[◊_NeBo[_Na_]LaDoNi_◊]

Only pedophiles dream about this. A normal man does not dream of fucking children.

Strecoza, and in Arab countries women are stoned to death for adultery...and they know this and still they have such executions regularly. In China, bribery is punishable by death and is carried out regularly. This is my answer to your question: the experience of which countries proves that the death penalty does not mean zero crimes punishable by it.

and in America, in some states there is the death penalty and life imprisonment and yet sometimes such shit happens there, worse than here.

[Venus]

I suck at this zoo (I’m not talking about pedophilia). And about pedophilia... well, one unbalanced guy fucked a girl at the age of 13... and who hasn’t dreamed of it? Poke me in the eye

Only pedophiles dream about this. A normal man does not dream of fucking children.

Sent after 2 minutes 31 seconds:
Strecoza, and Arab countries Women are stoned to death for adultery... and they know it, and yet they still carry out such executions regularly. In China, bribery is punishable by death and is carried out regularly. To answer your question, the experience of which countries proves that the death penalty does not mean zero crimes punishable by it. And they can give 5 years for murder... in 1992 we tried a man who shot thief in law Screw with a machine gun.. ( the trial was going on in the courtroom next to my office and the defendant’s lawyer came to us to drink tea during breaks), so for this... they gave 5 years, they took into account the identity of the victim, they say a forest orderly... (he was killed in the zone, of course)

And where did I write that the death penalty is zero crimes? I wrote that a murderer would not have to spend a huge amount of money while he is serving his sentence, he would not be able to commit a relapse and kill someone else, and the punishment would be fair. Well, of course, many animals will think before they kill, very many. You understand one thing - these animals themselves do not want to die.

[Tanya]

And as the experience of many countries shows, the death penalty is not a deterrent.

What experience? Which countries?

[/quote]

Dragonfly. I answered this question of yours

[Venus]

And as the experience of many countries shows, the death penalty is not a deterrent.

What is your experience? Which countries?

Dragonfly. I answered this question of yours
[/quote]

And, now show me where I wrote about zero crime?

[Tanya]

Strecoza, You asked the experience of which countries shows that mortal execution is not a deterrent. I told you that this is the experience of Arab countries and China, the United States added. What does zero crime have to do with this? Neither you nor I have written and are not writing about zero.

[Hair shirt]

Only pedophiles dream about this. A normal man does not dream of fucking children.

Come on! Why are you grimacing as if you don’t know which side the cigarette is lit from.

No one is justifying pedophilia here.
Again, then, we need to define the concept of CHILDREN. It is also customary to call school graduates children.
And I think we are talking about them. About those children who are no longer children, but who will not be given a passport today or tomorrow.

You just need to accept that this is a taboo topic on which it is forbidden to say or write anything.
But nevertheless, this does not make reality any different.

Well, in general, I could write a lot about all this right now here. But I won’t because this topic is forbidden just like, say, religion or politics.
Like, if you want to discuss any of the three topics listed above, gather your friends in your kitchen and discuss until the end. But it’s better not to do this publicly.

And any forum on the Internet is already a public platform. So just think something to yourself and silently pass by.

P.S.
Are those your boobs in your avatar?
:- )

[red_fox]

red_fox: ↑Today, 15:41
Strecoza: ↑Yesterday, 19:47
Culture is the achievements of humanity, and prohibitions are a brake.
You are talking bullshit. Thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not steal are also prohibitions. Laws are also prohibitions. If you want to live without prohibitions, go to the taiga, the jungle, etc.
)))) Laws are not prohibitions. You think first, and then write

A law is an official rule established by the state and regulating any area of ​​public life, which everyone must comply with.

Signs of the state:
... Coerciveness of power (the use of violence to implement decisions taken by the state)....

nA considerable part of the laws are just prohibitions/punishments. What’s wrong? You can break it, but you will get... a sentence, a fine, an arrest...

[Tanya]

hair shirt, let’s turn to wikipedia? Here;Pedophilia (alternatively spelled pedophilia) is a mental disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.
That says it all, if they experience attraction, then they are pedophiles and nothing else given.

[Venus]

that the death penalty does not mean zero crime

And who wrote this?
Read what I wrote above. She gave four reasons in favor. Very weighty arguments.
Your son is in women’s restroom they pushed you into school and you went around looking into it and making threats. Why haven’t you forgiven them? You offer to castrate people for fantasies, but you forgive murders. There is some kind of dissonance in your reaction. You forgive for serious crimes, but for... not even crimes you tear and rant.
I have the feeling that you are writing only to write against my point of view. No arguments. Just against it and that’s it.

Sent after 2 minutes 20 seconds:

red_fox: ↑Today, 15:41
Strecoza: ↑Yesterday, 19:47
Culture is the achievements of humanity, and prohibitions are a hindrance.
You You’re talking bullshit. Thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not steal are also prohibitions. Laws are also prohibitions. If you want to live without prohibitions, go to the taiga, the jungle, etc.
)))) Laws are not prohibitions. You think first, and then write

A law is an official rule established by the state and regulating any area of ​​public life, which everyone must comply with.

Signs of the state:
... Coerciveness of power (the use of violence to implement decisions taken by the state)....

nA considerable part of the laws are just prohibitions/punishments. What’s wrong? You can break it, but you will get... a sentence, a fine, an arrest...

Well, let’s start with the main law of the country. Constitution. Take it and read it. Once you read it, write here. I’ll ask you one question.

[Hair shirt]

Shirt shirt, let’s turn to Vekipedia? Here;Pedophilia (alternatively spelled pedophilia) is a mental disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.
That says it all, if they experience attraction, then they are pedophiles and nothing else given.

Why then do they imprison fifteen-year-olds who already have boobs and pussies, sometimes larger than those who are twice their age?
Pre-pubertal age this is from when to what time?
In general, I really don’t want to discuss this topic. It’s not safe.
And I don’t advise you either.
Let’s better discuss your boobs on your avatar.

You It’s not just that they placed this particular picture on your avatar.