Question straight to the point! Do you think that sexual freedom is the same for men and women?

[Marion]

The question is asked in the title. I believe that the common idea in some circles that a man can allegedly hang out with women, but a woman should be faithful to only one man, is fundamentally incorrect. And that the stupid saying “lock and key” has long outlived its usefulness. I want to post this same picture on my "favorite" ABF forum (I think many people know about it).

key_gun.jpg

[Gloria777]

You don’t understand what I’m telling you. I don’t care about your opinion and to spite you I won’t do anything, this is just the behavior of a child))

You can flood the entire forum with messages that I’m stupid and that I’m a man, but I won’t care)) did you miss it? I hope so!!!

[The passage]

You don’t understand what I’m telling you. I don’t care about your opinion and to spite you I won’t do anything, this is just the behavior of a child))

You can flood the entire forum with messages that I’m stupid and that I’m a man, but I won’t care)) did you miss it? I hope so!!!

Yes, I got it))) Women write a man, not a man - this is for you in the future, when you again register another female account in mind. Oh, I missed this - how old are you, probably under 50 or more? )))
I will not flood the forum with messages. You are not stupid, but I can’t call a normal man who pretends to be a woman either. Good evening to you.

[Gloria777]

How much anger are you in)) and have a good evening WOMAN!!!!

[The passage]

How much anger you have)) and have a nice day WOMAN!!!!

Go to the doctor. Explain that you have been posing as a woman on forums for several years now. Let them examine it. Perhaps there are mental disorders. Treatment will be prescribed. Don’t wait for the ambulance to take you away in a straitjacket. You will come back here a man. Let’s chat.

[Gloria777]

Whatever you say, I will definitely contact you and advise you to come see you, you have obvious signs of aggression))

[The passage]

As you say) I will definitely contact you and advise you to come to me, you have obvious signs of aggression))

Of course, advise. Do not forget.

[Mr.hamsterrr]

This has never happened before and here it is again

[Beluga]

A woman, here and there, is very vulnerable and double standards have always been and remain

I don’t know how it is with women in men’s companies basically yes. If a married man talks about his leftists, then he is a wow "macho" "male" "buffalo" and when discussing the same women he is derogatory "skin" "giver" and .etc.
For me this is wrong, morality should work in both directions.

[Aion2012Dead]

Belukha,
Morality does not work in both sides, purely because of the biological fact - that one male can impregnate many females, and one female can only choose the most worthy.
I also agree that such an approach, although logical, is not dominant in the world of people, where self-awareness exists.
And morality is based on pure biology, and arose at a time when survival was the prerogative.

[Vert]

Yes, absolutely the same freedom. We need to respect each other and not do things that will make the other person feel bad and that the other person will not accept.

[Beluga]

Aion2012Dead,

Yes, if you go down to the level of animals, then yes. A strong male took a female from a weak one, killed the offspring from him, inseminated the female and with this he fulfilled his role, you can climb onto the highest branch and sit there looking around your possessions, baring your fangs and scratching your dignity .
But people are people because they live not only following animal instincts. There is morality, ethics, law...
Therefore, as for me, it should work in both directions. If you behave accordingly, then you are not a "macho" and not a "hero" but the same whore but in a man’s guise, or a woman is also "beautiful" and "well done" if everyone you meet is attracted to bed

[Aion2012Dead]

Belukha,
Did I really say different?
I described the story a little differently.
Morals, ethics and laws do not always work in terms of relationships.
As for double standards - completely FOR!
I also don’t like that the role of a woman in society is so devalued.
I would prefer there to be choice and freedom in relation to sexual partners, without any admixture of judgment.
Example from childhood - Emmanuel, this is an ideal (as far as I remember) example of a free woman.
I, like any guy, like the idea of ​​a harem, so that there are many girls around me, each of whom agrees to this.
But I also want so that girls also have the same thing - a harem of guys, each of whom agrees with all these conditions.

[King Bird]

I want to post this same picture on my "favorite" ABF forum

What’s the point? There, at best, they won’t understand this, at worst, they’ll be so confused that it doesn’t seem like enough. And the admins will most likely delete the topic.

UPD: Yes, and I would pose the question in the topic differently. The answer is too simple - it is not the same. It would be better to ask this: Do you think that sexual freedom for men and women should be the same?

Men should fuck "everyone", and women should seduce "everyone", but have sex with the most promising male in order to reproduce the most promising offspring.

Yes, there is an opinion that most women, regardless of who they are in a relationship with, will still prefer the biggest-boned and vicious male, even if he is stupid and stupid, than an intelligent one, rich, but physically frail. It is difficult to say how true this is all.

But most biosociologists (if I am not mistaken in the name) believe that it is somewhat more difficult to find a “promising” male in modern society than in the Neanderthal tribe . And there is one more reason, this has already been discussed in the topic about young mothers. A woman who has given birth and recovered after childbirth very often begins to tear her husband down, without knowing why she does it. And if you get into the subcortex, then she needs to accept biomaterial from other men - this is how nature tries to fight the degeneration of the tribe, not realizing that people have moved to another stage of development. And that education, the notorious morality and even just normal female fidelity are in conflict with ancient instincts. Hence the increased hysteria in women.

double standards work both ways!

And how they work. If, in terms of condemning excessive looseness, laws and concepts work against women, then when it comes to dealing with the consequences (including in court), they definitely work against men. But this is how it happened historically. In some countries they tried to level this out, but to no avail. On the contrary, in some cases, in the event of a divorce, for example, men are left with no rights at all. And you have to support not only children, but also ex-wives. Although women seem to have fought for equal rights with men, in reality sometimes things only get worse.

[Aion2012Dead]

A significant part of biosociologists (if I am not mistaken in the name) believe that it is somewhat more difficult to find a “promising” male in modern society than in the Neanderthal tribe. And there is one more reason, this has already been discussed in the topic about young mothers. A woman who has given birth and recovered after childbirth very often begins to tear her husband down, without knowing why she does it. And if you get into the subcortex, then she needs to accept biomaterial from other men - this is how nature tries to fight the degeneration of the tribe, not realizing that people have moved to another stage of development,

This is the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard, starting with the comments of flat-earthers........
Sounds just like a scientific justification for why women become dumb after childbirth and want divorce or adultery.
nNature never tries to do anything - nature, or if we call it globally - evolution - has no will.
This is just a long process, and not some kind of purposeful development..
All of the above, like blowing your husband’s brains out and so on, there are quite understandable roots.
And they lie - in various composite patterns - behavioral, educational and yes, bio-chemistry has a place here - hormonal as well.
We, as a species, are quite capable of taking control of our minds and emotions, with due desire and diligence.
But we are talking only about conscious behavior.
But unconscious manifestations and reactions - not yet.
But me too, I’m still a sofa analyst, so I can be shamed for my cleverness, for no reason.

[King Bird]

But I too, I’m still an armchair analyst, so you can shame me for my cleverness, for no reason.

I won’t, because we both ultimately As a result, we use the results of research by "British scientists."

[Andrey Lukashov]

I read your topic. Where are you talking like a 5 year old? I am 100% sure that you are a man without any buts. There is no point in discussing this....

Marinka, why don’t you admit that this could be a hermaphrodite:) You know, the kind of person who has and penis, and vagina:)
As for the photographs, everything is also understandable. You should show this :)

[Beluga]

I, like any guy, like the idea of ​​a harem, so that there are many girls around me, each of whom agrees to it.

The idea of ​​a harem is good only in an ideal boyish fantasy - when all the girls are in full dress, in stockings, with makeup and hair done, they want, they are in a great mood, there are no "women’s days" no headaches and in transport they weren’t rude, and it’s a shame they’re new shoes and lifts are not rubbed with anything. Then yes, the harem is ideal. And the owner of a harem, by definition, always has a pocket of money for roses, jewelry and chocolates for everyone and the apartment is not a studio.
And, yes, they are not yet distracted by other men during downtime.

[Serg_A]

The question is asked in the title. I believe that the common idea in some circles that a man can allegedly hang out with women, but a woman should be faithful to only one man, is fundamentally incorrect. And that the stupid saying “lock and key” has long outlived its usefulness. I want to post the same picture on my "favorite" ABF forum (I think many people know about it).

key_gun.jpg

Marion, she’s trying give an answer to this (your own) question in the book "Autumn Lightning". The book contains very vividly written erotic episodes of a young teacher - the main character. This is how an episode with a student is described, as well as with a young, handsome, dominant electrician. There are also attempts to contact women, or rather, this is more the imagination of the heroine herself. A good find, it seems to me, in the description of erotic scenes is the use of dominance of one of the partners; in the first scene, a young teacher easily dominates a student, teaching him sex. In the second scene, she is already completely dominated by her adult lover, and although I am not in this topic, I felt the emotions of the characters well. On this wave, Marion, argues through the mouth of the heroine (Olga Tochilova), that in fact, it is women who dominate everywhere in sex: blowjob, this is female dominance, cunnilingus, this is also female dominance (as I already said, I do not agree with this, in fact, here each of the partners sees what he wants, for example, my young girl, with whom I am now meeting for cunnilingus, gives herself to my caresses as a dominant male, and this is surprising). Here if we proceed from these premises, then like If everything is fine, for women, they dominate everywhere, and then why ask this question?

[Serg_A]

It is difficult to answer the question Marion, there are problems here actually much wider. But this is where they are hidden, here Marion, in in his own book "Autumn Lightning" makes it clear. It’s very impressive that she puts all this into the mouth of a maniac-killer, very impressive... The maniac here acts as a kind of champion of the “moral values” that come down to us from above through the Orthodox (and far from only Orthodoxadherents. So, I would like to say that in fact here no one is free, neither men nor women , there are no freedoms anywhere, and no one has! And one of the reasons is in our empty heads, which will never grow wiser, and the second reason is that in these empty heads we are shitted by various kinds of “adherents” of patriarchal foundations. Sick society...

[Bravo61]

It turns me on very much when I know that my wife is moaning under someone else

[Andrey Lukashov]

I don’t intend to impose my opinion on others, but I believe that sexual freedom in the family of both spouses should be absolutely equal. Someone may object, citing the fact that a wife can become pregnant by someone else and give birth to a child not from her husband, and then the husband will nurse, feed, educate and provide everything necessary. My answer is that with such thoughts it is better to look for a wife who will be faithful to her husband all her life. By the way, there are very, very many such women, but most men like ladies who are simpler in this regard. Then there is nothing left to do but trust your wife and listen less to those who do not understand this. This is exactly how everything is in our family, which almost everyone who knows us considers strong and happy.

[Martin]

At least, having slept with another mistress, I always sternly tell her that God forbid, if I hear or see with my own eyes that she is hooking up with someone else on the side, I will immediately kill both her and her lover like a fly. ...Young mistresses are mostly scared, of course, although I really don’t care who else she’s fucking on the side...But of course I’ll threaten to intimidate her with physical pressure on her, or with refusal of financial support...Some the fools then really don’t make contact with anyone anymore...)))

[Milla]

I believe that open relationship It is normal between a man and a woman. I myself am a supporter of such relationships.

[Tanya]

Well, our society is not fair. More often than not, if a man walks to the left and has many victories in the sexual field, then he is a MACHE, and if a woman walks to the left, then she is a whore and a whore. what kind of equality is this?

[The passage]

At least, having slept with another mistress, I always sternly tell her that God forbid, if I hear or see with my own eyes that she is hooking up with someone else on the side, I will immediately kill her too, like a fly, and her lover... Young lovers are mostly scared, of course, although I really don’t care who else she’s fucking on the side... But of course I’ll threaten to intimidate her by physically influencing her, or by refusing material support. ..Some fools then really don’t make contact with anyone anymore...)))

How big is your financial support? Just please, not vaguely, but in monetary terms. Rubles per month. You can write in the currency for the year, I will translate and divide it myself. I would like to know how generous you are, if at all)))
And then I remember one man, when I lived in Moscow, offered me 45 thousand a month, because he would come to visit three times a month week. I sent him through the forest, of course. It’s not that I’m the right one. I would sleep for money, I don’t have any principles in this regard, and I had the same experience, but for five hundred bucks a month and for him to come when he wants. This is not serious at all.
In general, I think that when the children grow up, I will take a young lover. With a beautiful body, with a normal penis, temperamental. I will pay him the average salary in the country. I read the forum, people like this appear here regularly. Well, when you get bored. I’ll get a dog.

[Serg_A]

If a man walks to the left and has many victories in the sexual field, then he is MACE, and if a woman walks to the left, then she is a whore and a whore

I had a conversation a long time ago with my relatives, I just said that women like

whore and whore

worthy of respect, the conversation quickly turned to elevated tones. Do you know who screamed the most about how such women are fallen, it was my brother’s wife - woman !

[Marion]

Marion, it would be interesting to know - are you a feminist?

I have never joined any feminist organizations. That’s for sure. But to the best of my ability, at least in words, I will support many ideas of feminism (except for Radfem, of course). I also don’t like complete leveling and leveling of floors. But I always advocate that any woman has the right to live as she wants, with whomever she wants, to look the way she wants and dress the way she wants. In literature I try to defend the use of feminists. In my opinion, the Russian language among other Slavic languages ​​is poorer in this regard. I came across printed books from the 30s of the last century, where it was common to find words such as “engineer”, “constructor” and the like. And now you won’t even see the word “teacher,” at least in business language. It’s strange that "Student" and "student" remain, but I’m afraid that they too will be liquidated over time.

So, I would like to say that in fact no one is free here, not even men , neither women, there are no freedoms anywhere, and no one has! And one of the reasons is in our empty heads, which will never grow wiser, and the second reason is that in these empty heads we are shitted by various kinds of “adherents” of patriarchal foundations. A sick society...

You will be very surprised, but I have practically never encountered attacks from believers in the classical sense of the word, that is, from adherents of traditional religions. Rather, it was criticism at the everyday level. Strangely enough, those who suffered the most were the representatives of either paganism or some other kind of native faith. This style, if I may say so, critics, I can cite here, I decided to keep until the admins removed it.

03_Katty_84_livelib.jpg

[Serg_A]

You will be very surprised, but I have practically never encountered attacks from believers in the classical sense of the word, that is, from adherents of traditional religions. Rather, it was criticism at the everyday level. Strangely enough, those who suffered the most were the representatives of either paganism or some other kind of native faith. This style, if I may say so, critics, I can cite here, I decided to keep until the admins removed it

And I didn’t mean only the Orthodox, I mean All obscurantists, they are united precisely by the imposition of "patriarchy" and other nonsense on society.
Well, attacks do not always illuminate the full picture. And the main thing is that they plant it in our heads.

[Marion]

And I didn’t mean only the Orthodox, I mean all the obscurantists, they are united precisely by the imposition of “patriarchy” and other nonsense on society.
Well, attacks do not always illuminate the full picture. And the main thing is that they plant in our heads.

It is also very strange when society promotes rejection and indirect prohibition of LGBT movements of all types (I don’t want to touch this topic here and now), but at the same time they do not prohibit such a phenomenon as incest. And all because one of the patriarchal foundations is such a tradition as “domostroy”. They are bashfully silent about this, but in the old days, Domostroy was not at all against incest. On the contrary, sexual contacts between fathers and daughters, older brothers and younger sisters were implicitly encouraged. There is nothing to say about stepfathers and stepdaughters. As well as about mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law. This was generally in the order of things. These are the traditional clamps.

[Swarm]

I believe these freedoms are in people’s heads. If 1 girl is enough for you, then you “live” with one. And if not, then no. So it is with girls. One ex screamed to me, fell to her knees, I can’t love, there are 1 more than 3 days left. The pussy went over the bumps

[Viktor(go-go)]

Gender inequality in Russia greatly affects men. They are required to perform military service, and the retirement age of men is 5 years later than that of women. In addition, the judicial system of the Russian Federation infringes on the rights of men in favor of their children and wives. For example, a man cannot divorce if he and his wife have a common child under the age of 1 year. It is also difficult for a man to sue a child. In Russia, the court leaves children with their mother even if her financial situation and living conditions are much worse than those of the children’s father. According to statistics, 95% of divorce proceedings end with the court determining the place of residence of the children with their mother.

[Mr.hamsterrr]

it is very strange when society promotes rejection and indirect prohibition of LGBT movements of all types

But here I agree with our government. I am bisexual myself and actively engage in same-sex sex. But I am against such an orgy that occurs in states with genders and freedoms for gays and lesbians. And if you give freedom to these movements, then sooner or later it will happen, it’s like a snowball. Of course, there is no need to ban it either, but I am for all this to be without advertising. I believe that everyone should come to this themselves after at least graduating from school. The form in which we now have LGBT freedom in Russia is ideal for me. There are resources on the Internet, there are applications and sites for dating, for communication and sharing experiences. There are clubs, saunas, bars for meetings. People haven’t been beaten or killed for this for a long time. I don’t have any problems, I have enough freedom.

Sent after 2 minutes 9 seconds:
We have a lot of transsexuals in Moscow and St. Petersburg who feel great, earn money and relax in regular clubs, not in thematic ones. I have a trans friend who lives her life to the fullest, always in character and no one oppresses her.

[King Bird]

The people who were most ruined, oddly enough, were representatives of either paganism or some other kind of native faith. This style, if I may say so, critics, I can cite here, I decided to keep until the admins removed it.

Yes, defending such nonsense as telegony is really like a flat Earth.

And all because one of the patriarchal foundations is such a tradition as "domostroy". They are bashfully silent about this, but in the old days, Domostroy was not at all against incest. On the contrary, sexual contacts between fathers and daughters, older brothers and younger sisters were implicitly encouraged.

I also remember on Erogen, the topic of Domostroy was touched upon. Then the discussion smoothly turned to incest, and she was immediately fucked.

[Serg_A]

And I didn’t mean only the Orthodox, I mean all the obscurantists, they are united precisely by the imposition of “patriarchy” and other nonsense on society.
Well, attacks do not always illuminate the full picture. And the main thing is that they plant in our heads.

It is also very strange when society promotes rejection and indirect prohibition of LGBT movements of all types (I don’t want to touch this topic here and now), but at the same time they do not prohibit such a phenomenon as incest. And all because one of the patriarchal foundations is such a tradition as “domostroy”. They are bashfully silent about this, but in the old days, Domostroy was not at all against incest. On the contrary, sexual contacts between fathers and daughters, older brothers and younger sisters were implicitly encouraged. There is nothing to say about stepfathers and stepdaughters. As well as about mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law. This was generally in the order of things. These are the traditional clamps.

Yes, by the way, they love to pull out “valuables” that have long reeked of mothballs from half-rotten chests of the century before last. And shout that this is the ultimate truth. Here I will draw attention to the fact that it just comes down from above. And here’s what comes out of this in our heads:

I went to the women’s forum today. There are such sick women sitting there. One asks: "I don’t want to give a blowjob, but my partner really wants it, what should I do?"

They write to her: leave this sadomite.
- blowjob, this humiliation, there is no need to do it.
- this is a traumatic procedure.

And those who like oral sex want to be treated.
A normal woman will seek advice, everything is turned in the wrong direction at all.

I am shocked by this forum, there are really not enough men there. Come there more often if you’re bored)

And I, not so long ago, was carried (by accident) to some Orthodox channel, and there was a scene: a priest was standing in front of the parishioners , they pass him notes with questions, and he answers them, and so he reads in front of everyone:
- my husband constantly kisses my vagina, what is this?
And he started a sermon that we were created in the image and likeness of God, but there are also forest creatures, we cannot be like them... Something like this. Some kind of madness.

I want to emphasize here once again my opinion that in fact no one has freedom.

[King Bird]

On the contrary, sexual contacts between fathers and daughters, older brothers and younger sisters were implicitly encouraged. There is nothing to say about stepfathers and stepdaughters. As well as about mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law. This was generally in the order of things. These are the traditional bonds.

I would clarify that we are talking about forced sex here, and not that the girl wanted it and went to the hayloft with her consent , not to mention the initiative from below.

[Serg_A]

it is very strange when society promotes rejection and indirect banning of LGBT movements of all types

And here I agree with by our government. I am bisexual myself and actively engage in same-sex sex. But I am against such an orgy that occurs in states with genders and freedoms for gays and lesbians. And if you give freedom to these movements, then sooner or later it will happen, it’s like a snowball. Of course, there is no need to ban it either, but I am for all this to be without advertising. I believe that everyone should come to this themselves after at least graduating from school. The form in which we now have LGBT freedom in Russia is ideal for me. There are resources on the Internet, there are applications and sites for dating, for communication and sharing experiences. There are clubs, saunas, bars for meetings. People haven’t been beaten or killed for this for a long time. I don’t have any problems, I have enough freedom.

Sent after 2 minutes 9 seconds:
We have a lot of transsexuals in Moscow and St. Petersburg who feel great, earn money and relax in regular clubs, not in thematic ones. I have a trans friend who lives her life to the fullest in character and no one oppresses her

Well, there is a nuance: you, although you are bisexual, are either my school friend someone who is gay recognizes himself as a man, some trans person recognizes himself as a woman, and there are individuals who, as adults, cannot realize who they are. This, it seems to me, is precisely the consequence of a kind of violence against the psyche, when a person is not allowed to even think about who he is

Sent after 9 minutes 59 seconds:

On the contrary, sexual contacts between fathers and daughters, older brothers and younger ones were implicitly encouraged sisters. There is nothing to say about stepfathers and stepdaughters. As well as about mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law. This was generally in the order of things. These are the traditional bonds.

I would clarify that we are talking about forced sex here, and not that the girl wanted it and went to the hayloft with her consent , not to mention the initiative from below.

In my opinion, this is simply a reflection of the situation of the century before last (economic, demographic, and including serfdom). Now waving this decayed flag is not very smart.

[niqk]

Serg_A, I’ll say it cooler - freedom is impossible! In principle!!!
A person cannot free himself from his biological nature. He must eat, drink, breathe and in every possible way materially support his existence. Man is not free from social nature. As a social being, he can
survive only in a society of his own kind. Man is dependent on spiritual nature. He is born, brought up and grows up in a certain cultural environment, which completely determines the possibilities of his spiritual life. All these
restrictions drive a person into a fairly strict framework. Almost in a cage! Where can he not escape from, if only because he has no idea where he should actually escape? He can only senselessly rebel against some dogmas and restrictions, but offer something new, unusual, and most importantly - harmless! man is incapable! Everything that could be invented was invented thousands of years ago. And over these thousands of years, all innovations have been tested and introduced into so-called human values. And refusing them leads society into the abyss! And individual violations backfire on individual violators of moral standards...

[The passage]

Serg_A, I’ll say something cooler - freedom and impossible! In principle!!!
A person cannot free himself from his biological nature. He must eat, drink, breathe and in every possible way materially support his existence. Man is not free from social nature. As a social being, he can
survive only in a society of his own kind. Man is dependent on spiritual nature. He is born, brought up and grows up in a certain cultural environment, which completely determines the possibilities of his spiritual life. All these
restrictions drive a person into a fairly strict framework. Almost in a cage! Where can he not escape from, if only because he has no idea where he should actually escape? He can only senselessly rebel against some dogmas and restrictions, but offer something new, unusual, and most importantly - harmless! man is incapable! Everything that could be invented was invented thousands of years ago. And over these thousands of years, all innovations have been tested and introduced into so-called human values. And refusing them leads society into the abyss! And individual violations backfire on individual violators of moral standards...

This cage was invented to manipulate people. Some people are openly parasitic on others.

[niqk]

Marinka, Nature created this cell! There are simply a lot of cunning parasites that are capable
of parasitizing anything... And this too!

[The passage]

Marinka, Nature created this cell! There are simply a lot of cunning parasites that are capable
of parasitizing anything... And this too!

Explain in detail what do you mean by a cell made by nature? Has nature given more rights to men than to women? Or has nature created social inequality? In nature, whoever does not work does not eat. In nature, even parasites have to sweat, and only in humans, parasites live better than others without doing anything.

[Polk]

They are bashfully silent about this, but in the old days, “Domostroy” was not at all against incest. On the contrary, sexual contacts between fathers and daughters, older brothers and younger sisters were implicitly encouraged

well, read Domostroy, there is no word about incest!!! There are 3 blocks of rules in this book: 1. Respect for God. 2. Respect for elders. 3. Recipes))) as always, I heard a ringing, but doesn’t know where it is))) I haven’t read Pasternak, but I condemn it

[niqk]

Marinka, Nature created Man, limited by boundaries: biological, social and spiritual. Man has mastered the content of these limitations for thousands of years through the bitter experience of trying to break
through these limitations. And he recorded the moral standards necessary for survival in the so-called sacred books.
Nature has given men and women significantly different rights, although they have common identical rights.
For example, the right to happiness...
Social inequality is inevitable! Since there is biological inequality: someone is stronger, smarter, more agile, etc. Therefore, they manage to grab a larger share of any good than the weak, stupid, lazy...
And about parasites - explain who you mean by human parasites?

[The passage]

Marinka, Nature created Man, limited framework: biological, social and spiritual. Man has mastered the content of these limitations for thousands of years through the bitter experience of trying to break
through these limitations. And he recorded the moral standards necessary for survival in the so-called sacred books.
Nature has given men and women significantly different rights, although they have common identical rights.
For example, the right to happiness...
Social inequality is inevitable! Since there is biological inequality: someone is stronger, smarter, more agile, etc. Therefore, they manage to grab a larger share of any good than the weak, stupid, lazy...
And about parasites - explain who you mean by human parasites?

People haven’t mastered anything - it’s just the laziest and smartest ones who came up with all these rules in order to live well and do nothing.
And we don’t have such a thing that those who are smarter, stronger, more agile have more benefits. On the contrary, we are stupid, lazy, cruel, cunning and have benefits. What do you mean by the word work? This is an activity that is useful to others. Right? And, now look at the income of those who do something useful? The most minimal and the less benefit a person provides, the greater his income. These are parasites.

[niqk]

Marinka, hmm... everything is wrong!
Nature created these rules. And according to these rules, Nature created Man. And no smart-ass people came up with anything like this: you have to eat so as not to die. And in order to eat something, you need to get it. But a person alone
cannot get anything in the long term. He is a social creature! A person can only survive in a pack! How does a flock work? There is a Leader in it! The smartest, the strongest, the most macho! Around the Leader there are a group of Henchmen who serve the Leader and carry out his tasks. Next comes the main Mass of fellow tribesmen
who perform the main work under the supervision of the Henchmen. Those who cannot fit into a place in the social hierarchy become Outcasts, who are at the bottom of society. At their expense, others survive when someone
needs to be sacrificed under unfavorable circumstances. All! There are no extra ones in the Flock! Anyone who does not bring any benefit to the Pack is expelled from it sooner or later. And they die! Those who are unnecessary have no benefits! And even more so, stupid and lazy. It seems to you that some of them can settle down in such a way that they can live their entire lives at the expense of others.
They perform their important social functions, which are not always visible at first glance...

[Serg_A]

Serg_A, I’ll say something cooler - freedom and impossible! In principle!!!
A person cannot free himself from his biological nature. He must eat, drink, breathe and in every possible way materially support his existence. Man is not free from social nature. As a social being, he can
survive only in a society of his own kind. Man is dependent on spiritual nature. He is born, brought up and grows up in a certain cultural environment, which completely determines the possibilities of his spiritual life. All these
restrictions drive a person into a fairly strict framework. Almost in a cage! Where can he not escape from, if only because he has no idea where he should actually escape? He can only senselessly rebel against some dogmas and restrictions, but offer something new, unusual, and most importantly - harmless! man is incapable! Everything that could be invented was invented thousands of years ago. And over these thousands of years, all innovations have been tested and introduced into so-called human values. And refusing them leads society into the abyss! And individual violations backfire on individual violators of moral standards...

Well, that is, you seriously think that wearing a burqa for women is such a human value, without which humanity will he fly into the abyss?

[The passage]

Marinka, hmm... that’s it not so!
Nature created these rules. And according to these rules, Nature created Man. And no smart-ass people came up with anything like this: you have to eat so as not to die. And in order to eat something, you need to get it. But a person alone
cannot get anything in the long term. He is a social creature! A person can only survive in a pack! How does a flock work? There is a Leader in it! The smartest, the strongest, the most macho! Around the Leader there are a group of Henchmen who serve the Leader and carry out his tasks. Next comes the main Mass of fellow tribesmen
who perform the main work under the supervision of the Henchmen. Those who cannot fit into a place in the social hierarchy become Outcasts, who are at the bottom of society. At their expense, others survive when someone
needs to be sacrificed under unfavorable circumstances. All! There are no extra ones in the Flock! Anyone who does not bring any benefit to the Pack is expelled from it sooner or later. And they die! Those who are unnecessary have no benefits! And even more so, stupid and lazy. It seems to you that some of them can settle down in such a way that they can live their entire lives at the expense of others.
They perform their important social functions, which are not always visible at first glance...

What flocks? These were not yet people. People tamed animals and began to plant useful plants. There was enough food. There was more of it than needed, and then the smart-ass people thought that if there is more food than needed, then they don’t have to plant it or grow it, it will be shared with them and they will be full without doing anything. But over time, this became not enough for them, and then they began to come up with different rules and laws, morality. The smart-ass people began not only to do nothing and live at the expense of others, but to live much better than those others who actually feed them. It has gotten to the point where those who feed everyone are considered losers, and parasites are considered successful people.
Of course, what parasites do is not visible at first glance. And from the second too. They are parasitic. That’s what they do.

[niqk]

Serg_A, the picture of the World of a devout Muslim, who considers wearing a burqa to be the fulfillment of the Prophet’s commandments. And he will fight such trends with all his might.

Sent after 6 minutes 42 seconds:
Marinka, Well, there was never enough food. Yes, there were good harvests when you could eat almost to your fill. But for the most part there were droughts, raids by enemies who took away the last piece of bread and drove farmers into slavery... Read history - it’s not at all the blissful picture that you see...
And who Were there those smart-ass people who "became not just doing nothing and living at the expense of others"? Can you point out
them - specifically?

[The passage]

Serg_A, the picture of the World will fly into the abyss a devout Muslim who considers wearing a burqa to fulfill the commandments of the Prophet. And he will fight such trends with all his might.

Sent after 6 minutes 42 seconds:
Marinka, Well, there was never enough food. Yes, there were good harvests when you could eat almost to your fill. But for the most part there were droughts, raids by enemies who took away the last piece of bread and drove farmers into slavery... Read history - it’s not at all the blissful picture that you see...
And who Were there those smart-ass people who "became not just doing nothing and living at the expense of others"? Can you point out
them specifically?

Read the history. Why were people taken into slavery? To be fed. The same thing with serfdom. Oh, you say there wasn’t enough food. Slaves and serfs fed them.
Now, of course, there are many more parasites. Due to increased labor productivity. So you personally, what do you do useful for people at work?

[niqk]

Marinka, who drove people into slavery? Who forced them to work for slave owners? Or did they do
it voluntarily?

[Serg_A]

Serg_A, the picture of the World of a devout Muslim who considers wearing
the burqa to be the fulfillment of the commandments of the Prophet will fly into the abyss. And he will fight such trends with all his might

Well, I’m saying, why the hell did they send us these bastards and parasites with beards and censers, just like everyone else the rest? At one time they were fucking separated from the state, and they did the right thing; whoever wants to smoke this opium should do it alone. And now they are pushing them everywhere, wherever they can, so that we can shit more in our heads.