Huge mistake of humanity

[Vadim77]

with us?

How do I know how "you have "with age. I just provided numbers from my experience.

Sent after 1 minute 31 seconds:

To know life here, you have to live here.

Imagine, I lived in Russia for many years, and started back in the USSR, so that I know firsthand.

[Bro]

Perhaps it is custom-made

It’s unlikely, Manucharov invites a lot of different people, but almost all of them are interesting. He was not noticed in the order, and for our idiots from the AP and so, such videos are too complicated.

[Mongoose]

Then tell me why in Europe, in many countries, the age of consent is 14 years old? Anyone can look up country statistics on Wikipedia. Probably they have such an age of consent to increase the birth rate and population, well, it’s not just that they have everything

so fuck you in your ass, why the hell have you forgotten in Russia? There in Europe, pedophiles will be happy to see you.

For reference: - In Europe, the laws against pedophilia are much stricter! And despite the fact that the age of consent in 13 European countries (I don’t remember exactly) is 14 years old, with a caveat this applies only to intimate relationships between minors.

[Bro]

it also seemed strange to me that a woman with a professorial degree is against education and for depriving women of the right to manage their lives and bodies.

she doesn’t mind, look in full, you’ll understand everything

Sent after 1 minute 31 seconds:

Europe has much stricter laws against pedophilia!

half of the local dreamers would have been there long ago mistaken for their writings and pictures

[Mongoose]

I also found it strange that a woman with a professorial degree is against education and for depriving women of the right to manage their lives and bodies.

she doesn’t mind, look in full, you’ll understand everything

My mistake!!! It was I who answered the sorcerer to the phrase there in Europe pedophiles will be happy! (it just sounded something like - we’re screwed here, but pedophilia is thriving there)

[◊_NeBo[_Na_]LaDoNi_◊]

with us?

How do I know how "you have" with age. I just provided numbers from my experience.

you presented them with such confidence, as if this should be the case for everyone and always! You wrote just one example from your life!.. does this look like statistics?..
80% of marriages in the Russian Federation end in divorce, how long do you think a marriage between teenagers will last?.. if it is concluded at all. .
It’s normal to give birth at 20-30 years old, but not at 15 - it’s some kind of madness, forcing children to give birth to children!.. I have children of almost the same age and I know what I’m talking about..

[Bro]

Mongoose, there’s no point in arguing with him, he has a head-mounted TV brain

[Womanslave]

if you become pregnant, be ready to give birth

I absolutely agree with the age of consent. It’s high time to reconsider it. But about "forced childbirth" - this is not correct. If the child is not needed, then the attitude towards him will be appropriate. Therefore, will we breed homelessness and potential criminals? In order for the birth rate to increase, the state should simply completely reconsider its attitude towards its citizens and create suitable conditions for this, primarily socio-economic.

[Venus]

Perhaps it is custom-made

It’s unlikely, Manucharov invites a lot of different people, but almost all of them are interesting. He was not noticed in the order, and for our idiots from the AP and so, such videos are too complicated.

If you want, we can discuss this interview.

[Vadim77]

just one example from my life!.. does this look like statistics?..

I never stated anything about statistics and mass participation. Just told about a real case of my close friends. There are other examples of childbirth at 17 and everything is ok.
And I told you because, for example, in our country, the majority of mothers in maternity hospitals (if they are not gypsies/Muslims) are over 35 and often with their first-born, hence the mass of children "with special needs" and other things.. ..
But young mothers have beautiful, COMPLETELY healthy children, and this is an indicator.
Previously, the first birth at the age of 13-14 was considered absolutely normal and there were much more different talents than now.

Sent after 2 minutes 29 seconds:

we will create homelessness

Yes, in Russia, judging by According to Internet sites and responses from institutions, there is a huge queue of people wanting to adopt, we ourselves made a request several years ago, so you can make wealthy childless families happy and not create anything.

[Bro]

If you want, we can discuss this interview

yes, probably just the two of us watched the whole

[Vadim77]

I absolutely agree with the age of consent. It’s high time to reconsider it.

In some countries, before exactly, now I’m not sure, instead of the age of consent there was a concept - reaching puberty. That is, there are secondary sexual characteristics and the body is ready for conception - it is no longer a child and has the right to decide for itself with whom and when to have sex. And this is more logical, because some people’s tits and pussies have already grown at 12 and their hormones are raging, even if you climb a wall, while others have boards and dolls in their heads even at 15.

[Venus]

If you want, we can discuss this interview

yes, probably just the two of us watched the whole

Even if this was not an order, she still supported the opinion that they are trying to impose on us from above. Look, she says that they used to live poorly, but they still gave birth. Previously, people lived on the earth. The more children there are, the more land will be cultivated and the more livestock will be raised. They won’t die of hunger. And now a young family will buy a one-room apartment with a 30-year mortgage, for which they will pay half the income and they have nowhere to give birth, and there is nothing to raise them. Children are an expensive pleasure.
The only correct thing she said was that it is easier to manage the poorly educated. Well, semi-poor people are also easy to manage. Most of us live from paycheck to paycheck. The sick are easy to manage and powerless. Everything is done to make it easy to control us and they don’t care that we are dying out. They will bring in migrants and they will breed like cockroaches.

[Vadim77]

primarily socio-economic.

But this is debatable, since in truly developed countries with powerful social support (I’m not even taking Germany, because here everything is collapsing before our eyes) the birth rate is still catastrophically low, and the poorest countries on the planet are multiplying like cockroaches.

[Bro]

If you want, we can discuss this interview

yes, probably just the two of us watched the whole

Even if this was not an order, she still supported the opinion that they are trying to impose on us from above. Look, she says that they used to live poorly, but they still gave birth. Previously, people lived on the earth. The more children there are, the more land will be cultivated and the more livestock will be raised. They won’t die of hunger. And now a young family will buy a one-room apartment with a 30-year mortgage, for which they will pay half the income and they have nowhere to give birth, and there is nothing to raise them. Children are an expensive pleasure.
The only correct thing she said was that it is easier to manage the poorly educated. Well, semi-poor people are also easy to manage. Most of us live from paycheck to paycheck. The sick are easy to manage and powerless. Everything is done to make it easy to control us and they don’t care that we are dying out. They will bring in migrants and they will breed like cockroaches.

so what is she wrong about?

[Vadim77]

they would have long ago been mistaken for their writings

This is not

and pictures

And it’s more likely yes

[Sorcerer]

It depends on what kind of sex - if, as you like, to commit homosexual acts with men, then you are as useful as a goat of milk

you are definitely confident in your statements ?

[Venus]

yes, probably only you and I watched the whole

Even if this was not an order, she still supported the opinion that they are trying to impose on us from above. Look, she says that they used to live poorly, but they still gave birth. Previously, people lived on the earth. The more children there are, the more land will be cultivated and the more livestock will be raised. They won’t die of hunger. And now a young family will buy a one-room apartment with a 30-year mortgage, for which they will pay half the income and they have nowhere to give birth, and there is nothing to raise them. Children are an expensive pleasure.
The only correct thing she said was that it is easier to manage the poorly educated. Well, semi-poor people are also easy to manage. Most of us live from paycheck to paycheck. The sick are easy to manage and powerless. Everything is done to make it easy to control us and they don’t care that we are dying out. They will bring in migrants and they will breed like cockroaches.

so what is she wrong about?

She emphasized that the West is dying out and we are following their path. I remembered non-traditional people. But she is a biologist, a doctor of science, and she knows that people are not made traditional, but rather born. Fairy tales will not affect this, and neither will dolls. And their longevity is active. And they don’t die out. We are the only ones dying out and the reason is that the authorities are not interested in us reproducing.

[Vadim77]

are you sure of your statements?

I am based on your statements about your own bisexuality, that is, about your sex with men too, which in principle is homosexuality, even if this homosexuality is only part of the general orientation, but you cannot erase the words from the song, as they say.

Sent after 2 minutes 32 seconds:

They don’t become traditional, but they are born.

But this is not so - in the 70s experiments on the adoption of boys by homosexual couples - and upbringing in a certain environment did its job - the children BECAME homosexuals.

[Sorcerer]

the point of arguing with him, he has a brain TV

mutually, only you have a brain telegram. You have the other extreme - the opposition. Oh fuck, everything sucks, we poor people, the fucking oligarchs robbed us. Life is shit, all the women are whores and the sun is a fucking lantern. Why argue with you, you ignore messages. Well, as they say, the truth is born in a dispute, but not by you. Because the opposition does not like to enter into a discussion, even when he wrote about duplicity, ignoring means agreement. Well, you live like shit, you walk around naked, you have no money for clothes. You are plump from hunger, there is no food and you live in the rain and snow. It sucks to live next to bears in Russia. All the best to you.

Sent after 2 minutes 6 seconds:

Based on your statements about your own bisexuality, that is, about your sex with men too, which in principle is homosexuality, even if this homosexuality is only part of the general orientation, but you can’t erase the words from the song, as they say.

I’m bi, but then it’s clear that you judge by the topics in the bisexuality section. What did you forget there? For your information, I love girls too, imagine I had a wife, and imagine two children.

[Vadim77]

It sucks to live next to bears in Russia.

If the word "bears" is replaced with "Chechens" then the statement is true. Because the circus and the Middle Ages that Kadyrov’s people, who are above the law, are creating, is complete cruelty, which in a rule-of-law state is simply impossible on such a scale.

[BeachBunny]

Speaking of the interview, if you watched it carefully, you might have noticed that Vedunova essentially evaded the question twice: what is the reason that in the so-called developed countries, countries with a high standard of living, the white population is dying out, and in the poor countries, the population is only growing and they have started talking nonsense about support in old age. During the entire interview, she never named the main reasons for the extinction and replacement of the indigenous population of the Russian Federation or Europe. In the same story about a family from Spain, for example, she did not say that Spain is one of the countries with the most anti-male laws and the lowest birth rate in Europe, in principle.

P.S. Lowering the age of sexual consent to 14 years will not solve the demographic problem, but it will create new ones.

P.P.S. Increasing the level of education among women leads to problems with building long-term relationships with the opposite sex, with the ability to create a family, increases the average age of marriage, increases the average age of birth of the first child, and generally negatively affects demographics.

[Venus]

But this is not so - in the 70s experiments on the adoption of boys by homosexual couples - and upbringing in a certain environment did its job - the children BECAME homosexuals.

I have not read about such experiments. Post the link and I’ll read it. I read that orientation is innate. Like left-handedness and right-handedness, and if a left-handed child is taught to write with his right hand, he will still remain left-handed.

[Xenophon]

Brother, and also, I noticed that I wrote it, but I didn’t start it. Everyone has their own attitude towards the President of the Russian Federation, and if there were no politics, there is no need to mention him, neither for nor against. Outside of politics, then no mention. And since the message mentions the president, then expect a debate. And the president mentioned marriage at least twice that don’t be two-faced

Sent after 1 minute 15 seconds:

me suggestion limit the age of possible tenure of the presidential office to forty years. I assure you that then everything would be and will be fine with the birth rate.
This scarecrow has already killed 200,000 Russians in the war who could have become fathers. And now our women will take the rap for this, dying from criminal abortions.
The principle of giving birth so that there is someone to die for the master is the principle of sheep, the leader of which is this ghoul of the Russian land!

stop reading the opposition and Ukrainian public pages.

Stop watching Russian television and reading custom Russian telegram channels! Don’t be a Teletubby.

[Vadim77]

I’m bi,

That’s why it’s doubly funny to read about horror stories about what allegedly happens to pedophiles in your prisons. Males with bi-orientation are sometimes treated no better. So "whose cow would moo....."

[Sorcerer]

Stop watching Russian television and reading custom Russian telegram channels! Don’t be a teletubby.

pm me a link to the source where the numbers of our guys who died are given, please

[Bro]

Strecoza, are they being born? Are you talking about all sorts of LGBT people??
They are born, yes, but there have always been a tiny number of them and it has not grown, and since the beginning of the 90s the explosive growth in their number and biology has nothing to do with it at all, this must be said thanks to the mass media, pop culture, etc. They raised a huge wave of propaganda that a person’s ego and desires are more important than moral standards.
White became black, and black became white.
At whose suggestion and for what purposes was this done, I don’t know, that’s where conspiracy theories begin. But I don’t believe that this happened by itself or naturally.

[Vadim77]

he will still remain left-handed.

Not so either. My left-handed brother was retrained from childhood and he became right-handed, only his left hand is much better than that of a normal right-hander, but in general he is now right-handed.

[Sorcerer]

That’s why it’s doubly funny to read about horror stories about what allegedly happens to pedophiles in your prisons. Males with bi-orientation are sometimes treated no better. So "whose cow would moo....."

shall we now talk about morality and law? You are comparing bi, I agree, yes this is not the norm, but who does it harm and is it really a crime against a child? Is this equivalent to comparison? Or are you on the side of pedophilia? As for prisons and bis, yes they do, but they have a choice. Pedophiles have no choice in the zone, and it’s good if they remain alive there. They break them there, this is already a minus for health, and then more and more.

[Venus]

Strecoza, are they being born? Are you talking about all sorts of LGBT people??
They are born, yes, but there have always been a tiny number of them and it has not grown, and since the beginning of the 90s the explosive growth in their number and biology has nothing to do with it at all, this must be said thanks to the mass media, pop culture, etc. They raised a huge wave of propaganda that a person’s ego and desires are more important than moral standards.
White became black, and black became white.
At whose suggestion and for what purposes was this done, I don’t know, that’s where conspiracy theories begin. But I don’t believe that this happened by itself or naturally.

We had an article and they disguised themselves as heterosexuals. They had families. They brought AIDS to Russia and they spread it. Because men do not get pregnant and therefore did not use protection. Well, then they infected their wives.

[Vadim77]

Drop off the link, I’ll read it.

To be honest, I’m too lazy to look, it’s in German. But if you are really interested, then look into the topic of this experiment in the Russian-language segment - you will also clearly find a lot of interesting things.

[Bro]

BeachBunny, there is an excellent example of development, and such that and no Europe ever dreamed of, this is the USSR. Even despite the war, with its huge losses. Constant population growth with a fairly high standard of living and level of education that is not achievable in modern Russia.

[Vadim77]

they will remain alive there.

Yes, they stay and come out and again attack the children again. Leave these tales about justice in the zone for teenagers from AUE. I communicate a lot while working with Russian security forces of far from the lowest ranks and I know very well that if there is money, both a pedophile and a partially rear-wheel drive vehicle will sit quite comfortably. And it’s purely a matter of amounts.

[Venus]

he will still remain left-handed.

Not so either. My left-handed brother was retrained from childhood and he became right-handed, only his left hand is much better than that of a normal right-hander, but in general he is now right-handed.

Left-handed is better, but in general right-handed?)))
I’m left-handed, I can write with my right hand and, in general, hold a mug and a spoon, but in general I am left-handed. Your brother was taught a lot, as was I, because many parents, out of ignorance, think that if you take the spoon from your left hand and force it to eat with your right hand, then a left-handed person will become a right-handed person. If you teach to write.
Take a test if you don’t believe me. Give your brother a tennis ball and let him throw it into the distance. You will see, the difference will be big. Then you will be convinced that he was left-handed and remains so.

Sent after 1 minute 20 seconds:

Drop the link and I’ll read it.

To be honest, I’m too lazy to look, it’s in German. But if you are really interested, then look into the topic of this experiment in the Russian-language segment - you will also clearly find a lot of interesting things.

I know German well. I was born in Germany and spent my childhood there, until school.

[Vadim77]

are you on the side of pedophilia?

I don’t know what this word or concept means in your brain, so I can’t answer.

[Bro]

Pedophiles in the zone have no choice,

do you believe in noble swindlers? Do you also believe in Santa Claus?
Everything is bought and sold there (just like everywhere else), if there are moneymakers, such a passenger will live there and not bother.

[Vadim77]

Left-handed is better, but in general right-handed?)))

You do not perceive the information correctly or do not read it carefully - he controls his left better than MOST ORDINARY RIGHT-HANDED PEOPLE , like me, for example, but no better than my right - is it clear now?

[Bro]

Vadim77, ahead of

[Venus]

Left-handed is better, but in general right-handed?)))

You do not perceive the information correctly or read it inattentively - he is better with his left, WHAT IS THE MOST ORDINARY RIGHT-HANDED HANDERS, like me, for example, but no better than their right hand - now it’s clear?

Give him the ball in his hands and he’ll understand that you are mistaken. It’s clear?

[Vadim77]

I know German well. I was born in Germany

I don’t see the connection, to be honest. I know a bunch of people who were born and spent the first years of their lives in one country, and then moved to another and completely forgot the language of the country of birth. It has more to do with the nationality of the parents than the place of birth. Bruce Willis is a prime example of this.

Sent after 3 minutes 9 seconds: n

Is it clear?

What should I understand??? They tested him with table tennis, he himself admitted that he automatically works with his right hand, and the left has already become auxiliary, although much more developed than that of ordinary right-handers. And now it’s much easier for him to write with his right hand, and to catch balls and mosquitoes too. It’s clear?

[Venus]

I know German well. I was born in Germany

I don’t see the connection, to be honest. I know a bunch of people who were born and spent the first years of their lives in one country, and then moved to another and completely forgot the language of the country of birth. It has more to do with the nationality of the parents than the place of birth. Bruce Willis is a prime example of this.

I wrote to myself. I know German well and whether you see the connection or not is not important. You’re strange. Write about experiments for which I was not given a link. Write about Russia, although you haven’t lived there for a long time, and write about a left-hander, although you yourself are right-handed.
It feels like you are making it up as you go, and then you make it up in order to support your invention with an argument made up on the fly.

[BeachBunny]

BeachBunny, there is a wonderful example of development, something that no Europe has ever dreamed of, this is the USSR. Even despite the war, with its huge losses. Constant population growth with a fairly high standard of living and level of education that is not achievable in modern Russia.

Not exactly) In 1950, per 1000 people in the population there were 0, 5 divorces, in 1960 there were already 1.5 divorces, in 1970 there were already 3, and in 1980 there were already more than 4 divorces per 1000 population, from which we can draw a simple conclusion that in the USSR from 1950 to 1980 the number of divorces per 1000 population increased by more than 8 times, this despite the fact that the number of marriages has decreased by about 15%.

[Venus]

What should I understand??? They tested him with table tennis, he himself admitted that he automatically works with his right hand, and the left has already become auxiliary, although much more developed than that of ordinary right-handers. And now it’s much easier for him to write with his right hand, and to catch balls and mosquitoes too. Got it?

So he is not left-handed and never has been. He has ambidexterity

[Xenophon]

Stop watching Russian television and reading custom Russian telegram channels! Don’t be a teletubby.

pm me a link to the source where the numbers of our guys who died are given, please

Oh, I forgot that the losses of our troops for teletubbies like you remained at 5-7 thousand people. Sobering up will be terrible. But your main ghoul has nothing to do with a million. Women are giving birth!

[Bro]

BeachBunny, and what does the statistics of divorces and marriages have to do with it? ?
I’m talking about the population of the Russian Federation and the modern Russian Federation

[BeachBunny]

Oh, I forgot that the losses of our troops for teletubbies like you remained at 5-7 thousand people. Sobering up will be terrible. But your main ghoul has nothing to do with a million. Women are giving birth!

Do you have documented data on Russian losses in the Northern Military District, at least for September of this year? No? Then don’t start demagoguery. In addition, no one is giving birth to anyone, now the birth rate is at the level of 1.3 or already lower, and a decline in general to 1.1 is predicted.

Sent after 3 minutes 29 seconds:

BeachBunny, and what does the statistics of divorces and marriages have to do with it??
I’m talking about the population of the Russian Federation and modern Russian Federation

Why do you cite the USSR as an example if you don’t see cause-and-effect relationships?) Or do you seriously think that the number of divorces does not affect the number of births children?)

[Bro]

In addition, no one is giving birth to anyone, now the birth rate is at the level of 1.3 or already lower, and they predict a decline in general to 1.1.

and under the damned commies it was 2 and even 2.23
And divorces didn’t interfere much

[Vadim77]

Not quite so

What does this statistics have to do with population growth??? Let’s also see what the percentage of international marriages was or how many black children were born from students from Angola during this time, for example?

Sent after 2 minutes 11 seconds:

about Russia, although you haven’t lived in it for a long time

Well, if last year is “a long time ago,” then okay, Let’s not continue.

That means he is not left-handed and never was.

I already understood that.

[Bro]

Strecoza, as always, you decided to get down to minor details
As they say "outplayed and destroyed"

[Vadim77]

do you seriously think that the number of divorces does not affect the number of children born?)

I believe that directly in no way, because, according to the same statistics , children are planned and had in the overwhelming majority BEFORE divorces, and if some hypothetical consequence of divorce may be in the theory that a couple, without divorcing, would have had another child, then the hypothesis that divorces increase fertility, since in a new marriage new children are born to previously divorced people and they would not have been born if there had not been a previous divorce....