Communication and friendship are great, but sex is not.

[etc]

For a long time in the USSR, genetics was considered a false science

What does genetics have to do with it? The brain was studied like no one else in the world.

I wrote that the more we learn, the more questions arise

So there are more questions related to pathologies brain.

[Hair shirt]

))) Now when someone starts to claim that we know everything, I always remember the ancient scientists who believed that the Earth was supported by three elephants that stood on a turtle. Then other scientists argued that the Sun revolves around the Earth. They didn’t just claim this. Mathematics and astronomy already existed at that time, and somehow they adjusted their formulas and calculations to these statements, and Giordano Bruno was even burned at the stake for claiming the opposite. With scientists it’s not so simple. Some today claim one thing, and tomorrow others will claim another.

Please note that electricity was discovered quite recently, only a little over a hundred years have passed. And humanity has existed for a couple of thousand years. Well, at least from what we know about humanity. The periodic table was compiled quite recently. And in general, about a hundred years ago, some kind of breakthrough occurred in literally all areas of science and technology.

Before that, the people lived in everyday life as their ancestors lived. And life was not particularly different from what it was three or four hundred years ago. Well, only the clothes changed, well, the weapons changed a little with the invention of gunpowder.
I like old textbooks, they present the subject very well. In my opinion, such textbooks are more focused on independent study of the subject than modern textbooks. Take, for example, that same Kiselev. All Soviet textbooks on this subject are based on his textbooks on arithmetic:

You need to register to see the link.

Так вот в этом его еще дореволюционном учебнике есть упоминание о других системах счисления кроме десятичной. И в его учебнике системам счисления выделено всего полстраницы. Да и то на примере не двоичного счисления а пятиричного. Я пытался постичь эту игру ума но так и не смог осмыслить как же это долны выглядеть обычное количество чего то там в пятиричной системе. То есть мы имеем 100 долларов. Вроде все понятно - вот бумажка в 100 долларов. Понятно что если ты у кого то купил что то за 20 долларов то он должен тебе дать сдачи 80 долларов. Вроде все понятно и даже не нужен калькулятор чтобы это понять.

А теперь представим все тоже самое в двоичной системе счисления. Где существуют только две цифры 0 и 1. И тут наступает пиздец. Мозг не справляется с этой кучей нолей и единиц и с точки зрения нормального человека это невозможно как то использовать в реальной практической плоскости. И видимо именно поэтому всем разнообразным видам счисления, двоичным, троичным, пятиричным в дореволюционном учебнике Киселева отведено всего страница.

Но именно двоичная система счисления произвела просто революцию в нашей жизни. Все что мы знаем и все что нас окружает, ну кроме может быть чистой механики как двигатель внутреннего сгорания, все работает на двоичной системе счисления. Практически вся автоматика, компутеры, холодильники, микроволновки, калькуляторы, программирование в целом.

Я это пишу к тому что Киселев как ученый никого не обманывал, и двоичная система счисления не перевернула все наши знания в арифметке. Она просто из второстепенной области которая существовала просто как игра ума стала первостепенной. И на ней щас строится вся наша жизнь. На ней летают самолеты, работает бытовая техника и работает все что связано с компутерами.

Просто возможно когда то может быть еще через сто лет, а может через тысячу нас видимо ждет еще один прорыв в научной области который произошел в начале двадцатого века. И какое то случайное изобретение чего то там вызовет точно также лавинообразные открытия в других смежных областях. И может быть мы (нет, уже не мы) узнаем что такое телепортация, что это такое когда садишься за комп, одеваешь специальные датчики, запускаешь програму - и вот через минуту ты уже знаешь японский язык!

А ведь когда то тоже кто то в своих мечтах и в сказках ездил верхом на теплой русской печке. Ну и выгляните в окошко - вон они, ездят по дорогам. Теплые русские печки. В них тепло и комфортно.

[etc]

I have an assumption that her brain was not working in full and in some special mode, which is why she coped with the stroke so easily

I can mistaken, Savelyev told the story, a man ended up in the Sklifasovsky Institute after an accident, it turned out that he had no frontal lobe on the left side. And he lived normally. It further explains how the brain copes.
You need to register to see the link.

[Hair shirt]

So there are more questions related to brain pathologies

Study the question better. It’s just that during the Soviet era, Lenin was a kind of Christ. Some kind of founder of essentially a new religion. And some kind of evidence of Lenin’s sacredness was needed. Christ did all sorts of miracles there, made the blind sighted, fed a bunch of people with one piece and all that. Well, I still walked on water.

What about Lenin? What was needed was some confirmation of his unusualness and difference from everyone else. I read that Lenin’s brain was divided into a million small layers. This is done with cadavers (Google what it is if you are not afraid of vomiting) for the purpose of studying one or another internal organ. After which for a long time, almost the entire existence of Sovk, people studied Lenin’s brain and tinkered with it. Someone will say that they were simply charlatans and wasted government money while pretending to be active.

And someone will say that they made a serious breakthrough in this area, but all the areas studied were classified. Why? Or maybe just in case, because they stumbled upon something and decided that now is not the time to make it public. Remember what I told you about the upcoming next breakthrough in the technical field?

And now imagine that our Russian scientists have invented teleportation. Real and without fools. This is a telephone booth. I entered it in Moscow and left it in New York. What do you think will happen to our country if such an invention becomes public?

I think our country will be fucked. And all of us too. Because no one will need oil. Cars, planes and other means of transportation will no longer be needed. And we will go around the world with our oil.
I think the KGB officers will simply strangle the scientist who invents this right now in childhood. And the Arabs will help them do this.

[romance book]

What is it - love or infatuation?

*********
LOVE
PASSION
********** ************

LOVE
1. Unselfish concern for the interests of another.

PASSION
1. Selfish, deprives of freedom of action. A person thinks: “What will this give me?”
********************************
2. Romantic feelings appear gradually, perhaps over several months or even years.
2. Romantic feelings arise quickly, perhaps within hours or days.
****************************
3. You were attracted to the person’s character and spiritual qualities.
3. You are deeply impressed or attracted by the person’s appearance (“He has incredible eyes!”, “She has a great figure!”).

4. Your relationships make you a better person.
4. Everything goes topsy-turvy, the usual rhythm of life is disrupted.

5. You perceive a person as he is - with all his shortcomings, but still love him.
5. You are out of touch with reality. The person seems perfect to you. You brush off any doubts caused by his serious shortcomings.

6. You have disagreements, but you manage to discuss problems and resolve them.
6. You argue often. The problems essentially remain unresolved. Many things are “settled” with a kiss.

7. You have a desire to give something to another person, to share with him.
7. You think more about taking and receiving, especially in satisfying sexual desires.

[etc]

Study the question better. It’s just that during the Soviet era, Lenin was a kind of Christ. Some kind of founder of essentially a new religion. And some kind of evidence of Lenin’s sacredness was needed. Christ did all sorts of miracles there, made the blind sighted, fed a bunch of people with one piece and all that. Well, I still walked on the water

Quietly rustling like slate, the roof moves slowly...

[Serg_A]

I have an assumption that her brain was not working in full and in some special mode, which is why she coped with the stroke so easily

I could be wrong, Savelyev told a story about a man who ended up in the Sklifasovsky Institute after an accident, and it turned out he had no frontal lobe on the left side. And he lived normally. It further explains how the brain copes.
You need to register to see the link.

As far as I remember, the entire hemisphere was missing. But, again, as far as I remember, the left one was larger than normal.

[Hair shirt]

The slate rustles quietly, the roof moves slowly...

For a long time I had the happiness of observing my father in my family. He was a military man. Served in the Army. At one time he graduated from the academy in Moscow. At our house, on shelves on the wall, we had the complete works of V.I. Lenin.
My father took the existing government very seriously. Like all officers, he was a member of the CPSU, moreover, he was a party organizer in the unit. I think because of my ignorance in this area. That is, he took seriously the teachings of Lenin, all this confusion that was called the teachings of Lenin and the Party.

And on long winter evenings, my father took any volume from the complete works of Lenin from the shelf and read with any place. I sat, read, made notes for myself, wrote something down in a notebook. As I understand it, he studied certain historical events of certain years based on the works of Lenin. That is, how it all originated and how everything happened, which then turned into this, in his opinion, apparently, an awesome and harmonious system, which was the very Sovkom.

And everything would have been fine, but then I in my life I have encountered different manifestations in people in the field of religion. I saw and observed people who profess something there. And what surprised me was that dad behaved in his time exactly like these people who now profess some kind of religion. Everything is the same, exactly the same, trace after trace. And even then I was surprised for myself - but my dad was simply a believer. But not in relation to any religion, but in relation to the CPSU and the teachings of Lenin and the Party.

What is Lenin in the mausoleum? Are these not the relics of saints?
Well, in general, you shouldn’t be joking. That’s how it is.

[attentive1]

What is this - love or passion?

Why would you have such a topic? When I wrote about a rubber doll from a sex shop or how to make an artificial dildo, I understood what was important to you...
I’ll write about (real) love simply - it’s when you feel good because your loved one feels good.

[Serg_A]

Lenin in the mausoleum is that? Aren’t these the same relics of the saints?
Well, in general, you’re kidding in vain. That’s how it is.

This is for someone else. For average minds, these are the relics of a saint. For me, for example, this is a museum exhibit, a monument.

[Serg_A]

[quote=Vasyanitsa post_id=259448 time=1695217461 user_id=20537] As I understand it, you deny your father the presence of intelligence, that is, you he is now on par with those who mindlessly bang their heads on the floor in church. Have you tried reading Lenin yourself? Maybe you read several volumes with your father, but asked him questions on the topics, and realized that he did not understand what he had read? Doesn’t understand, but just believes? No, you didn’t bother to do anything like that, you’re just reveling now in the fact that you “sort of” think, but I’ll disappoint you, you think exactly the same way as allowed gray mass. No more, no less.

These users thanked the author Serg_A for the post:

etc

[Hair shirt]

As I understand it, you deny your father the presence of intelligence, that is, you have now equated him with those who mindlessly bang their heads on the floor in church. Have you tried reading Lenin yourself? Maybe you read several volumes with your father, but asked him questions on the topics, and realized that he did not understand what he had read? Doesn’t understand, but just believes? No, you didn’t bother to do anything like that, you’re just reveling now in the fact that you “sort of” think, but I’ll disappoint you, you think exactly the same way as the gray masses are allowed. No more and no less.

Aggression and xenophobia in such matters are unacceptable. It is not for nothing that everyone is very careful when there is a question about religion and belief. You write that they say"those who mindlessly bang their heads on the floor in church". Mendeleev was a very devout man, he regularly went to church, and apparently he did not grimace and took this seriously. And not mindlessly, as you write, he banged his head on the floor. And despite this, I created this table of my own named after myself.

Catholics are generally more uncompromising in matters of faith. In Latin America you will simply be torn for saying such words. It’s not even worth talking about Muslims - and that’s understandable. That’s why you keep an eye on the market when you write something about religion. It is simply customary not to touch these things again and, as they say, not to offend the feelings of believers. But this message is not from me personally. You just might get into trouble, and I just know from experience that it’s better to keep your opinion about this or that faith to yourself - that way it will be calmer and safer for you.

I wrote about my father without any aggression. Unlike you. Note that I did not insult him and did not call him stupid or some kind of fool. I just paid all my attention to this and it seemed to me that this was the very religion that replaced the one that existed before the revolution. Yes, before her birth in Russia, it was the church that cemented society. A non-Orthodox person could not occupy any official position. Couldn’t become a military man. Other nationalities were called nothing less than infidels. And before they could take up any government position, they had to convert to Christianity. At that time we had a lot of baptized Tatars and other Volga peoples.

About Lenin’s works. For your information, subscribe like this it was simply impossible. It was a closed complete collection of works. It could only be issued by party workers and some higher ranks of the state. I studied at the journalism department. There was a good library there. I didn’t see Lenin’s complete works there. I asked a specialist.
As I remember right now, we seemed to have a hundred volumes. It occupied the entire wall of our house - from floor to ceiling there were shelves nailed to the wall, these volumes were behind glass.

I sometimes took something and read it just out of interest. All sorts of different documents from different times, his correspondence with anyone, his articles in various publications and his other other works on certain topics were published there. There are a lot of notes and orders to anyone photographed and translated into texts. There are a lot of documents where it was simply written in his hand that, for example, in this or that city, gather all the clergy, representatives of the merchant class, nobles of the upper classes and shoot them demonstrably.

And I myself have seen this more than once and not two. I already found these notes when I was studying at the journalism department and when information about this came out somewhere in the press about what kind of bloody executioner Lenin was. It was useful to search in the right volume on the right page and yes. There is such a thing. There are notes written by him in his own hand. And all this was in this complete assembly still far from the collapse of Sovka. That is, yes, this collection of works was closed and nothing was hidden in it. Everything was assembled as is. So to speak, for internal use.

[Serg_A]

Mendeleev was a very pious man, he regularly went to church, and apparently he didn’t grimace and took it seriously

He was, first of all, an intelligent person, and knew that if he did not visit the relevant institutions, then he would be taken into account by the relevant authorities.

That’s why you watch the market when you write something about religion. It is simply customary not to touch these things again and, as they say, not to offend the feelings of believers. But this message is not from me personally. You just might end up in trouble, and I just know from experience that it’s better to keep your opinion about this or that faith to yourself - this way it will be calmer and safer for you

Vyanitsa, thank you, and I’ve been following the bazaar for a long time, and I don’t say anything like that around me, because if I don’t follow, someone else will follow me. There have long been articles relevant to the denial of existence... And I have already noticed people around me who say not only what they think, but what is necessary.

There are a lot of notes and orders to anyone photographed and translated into texts. There are a lot of documents where it was simply written in his hand that, for example, in this or that city, gather all the clergy, representatives of the merchant class, nobles of the upper classes and shoot them demonstrably.

And I myself have seen this more than once and not two. I already found these notes when I was studying at the journalism department and when information about this came out somewhere in the press about what kind of bloody executioner Lenin was. It was useful to search in the right volume on the right page and yes. There is such a thing. There are notes written in his hand

Here you are, carefully monitoring the market, and writing what is needed...

[Hair shirt]

He was, first of all, an intelligent person, and he knew that if he did not visit the relevant institutions, then he would be taken for granted by the relevant authorities

This is him for you did you tell me?

And I have already noticed people around me who say not what they think, but what is necessary.

You yourself are not saying what you think right now. What’s so special about this? Common practice.

Vasyanitsa: ↑Today, 02:27
A lot of notes and orders to anyone photographed and translated into texts. There are a lot of documents where it was simply written in his hand that, for example, in this or that city, gather all the clergy, representatives of the merchant class, nobles of the upper classes and shoot them demonstrably.

And I myself have seen this more than once and not two. I already found these notes when I was studying at the journalism department and when information about this came out somewhere in the press about what kind of bloody executioner Lenin was. It was useful to search in the right volume on the right page and yes. There is such a thing. There are notes written in his hand
Here you are, carefully watching the market, and writing what you need...

And what am I doing? did you write something seditious in this text of yours? In general, when you work in an editorial office, you are your own censor and you quickly get used to writing within the framework of what is accepted or not accepted in this or that publication. So I didn’t write anything special in the text above.

About notes with executions? So this is a well-known fact. They are even photographed there in this complete collection of works. I will say more - this complete collection of works can be freely purchased right now on Avito:
You need to register to see the link.

You need to register to see the link.

Ну и что же такого я написал ужасного?

[Serg_A]

What did I write seditiously in this text of mine?

Nothing seditious, you wrote what is needed.