Serial monogamy

[Keep the change for yourself]

what did I forget in such a place?

))) And how will you answer it? What did you forget in such a place?))))

I’ll say I was hunting for insects, I wanted to catch one dragonfly for experiments))

[BeachBunny]

Strecoza, the essence of the article: Referring to the report, the agency notes that Amini in 2006 underwent a serious operation for craniopharyngioma (a benign tumor in the brain), after which she underwent treatment for a long time due to postoperative disruption of the hypothalamus-pituitary-gonadal axis (a hormonally interconnected system organs). In addition, Amini suffered from irregular heart rhythm and low blood pressure. According to the report, on September 13, when the girl was taken to the police station, she suffered a seizure due to cerebral hypoxia (decreased oxygen supply to the brain).
The examination report notes that over the next three days in intensive care The girl showed no improvement, since the flow of sufficient oxygen levels was hampered by problems with breathing problems and low blood pressure - hypotension. It was this that caused multiple organ failure, as a result of which the functioning of the brain was disrupted and stopped.
The morality police detained Amini on September 13 in Tehran. The girl was sent to one of the Faraj centers, owned by the police department and military intelligence, for an explanatory conversation. There Mahsi suffered a heart attack, after which she was immediately taken to the hospital. Three days later, on September 16, she died.

Sent after 4 minutes 25 seconds:

The use of lethal weapons there is an extraordinary event

In Russia the use of weapons is an extraordinary event, but in the USA it is not at all)

[Venus]

Makhsi had a heart attack there

You understand, what you described above is not a heart attack.

[etc]

But how will your partner/partner, husband/wife react when she finds out that you are here?
This is a question for everyone

Mine accepts my presence here normally. She laughed a lot when I posted my photo.

[Venus]

But how will your partner/partner, husband/wife react when she finds out that you are here?
This is a question for everyone

Mine accepts my presence here normally. She laughed a lot when I posted my photo.

))) Call her here. Let him also register and sit)))

[etc]

But how will your partner, husband/wife react when she finds out that you are here?
This is a question for everyone

Mine accepts my presence here normally. She laughed a lot when I posted my photo.

))) Call her here. Let him also register and sit)))

But how will your partner/partner, husband/wife react to what will know that you are here?
This is a question for everyone

Mine will normally perceive my presence here. She laughed a lot when I posted my photo.

))) Call her here. Let him also register and sit)))

He says that he is indirectly present on the forum).

[BeachBunny]

Again, the local Teletubbies are beginning to muddy the waters.
The interview given by the mother of the murdered woman was given under duress. Mass demonstrations in Iran regarding this event were apparently organized by the Anglo-Saxons.
All cases of the use of firearms in the United States are being investigated. And the whole world knows about this.
I would like to remind the Teletubbies about the interesting use of champagne bottles, which were put into use by our valiant law enforcement officers. Maybe we also have Anglo-Saxons working in the police?
Well, all sorts of hijabs, bans on education are also inventions of the State Department.
What I like most is that the person who cares most about family values ​​is the one who has no has no family. That’s the paradox.
And thanks to these tough Teletubbies, politics again spoiled an interesting topic.

nLet’s look at your writing, I can’t call this set of letters any other way)

"The interview given by the mother of the murdered woman was given under duress." Is there evidence of this? Have you seen the medical examination report, from which it could be concluded that the student died from violent acts, and not from the reasons described above in my comment?
"Mass demonstrations in Iran regarding this event were apparently organized by the Anglo-Saxons." Perhaps you don’t know where your legs come from, or perhaps they are the same as you, peddlers of democracy) Who organized mass demonstrations in Ukraine, Kazakhstan, in Belarus? Who organizes color revolutions here and there? Who sees tyrants and dictators everywhere?) Watch the video with Xi, who went to the USA the other day and what the senile Biden called him, and also look at Blinken’s reaction)

"All cases of use of firearms in the United States are investigated. And the whole world knows about it." They are investigating, what next?) If they had not been investigated, there would have been a massacre. "And the whole world knows about it" Are you by any chance a generous Ukrainian?) The thinking is very similar.
.
"I would like to remind the Teletubbies about the interesting use of champagne bottles that our valiant law enforcement officers put into use. Maybe we also have Anglo-Saxons working in the police?" What does the situation with bottles have to do with the topic in which is there a discussion? Do law enforcement officers in Russia kill people with champagne bottles?

"Well, all sorts of hijabs, bans on education - these are also inventions of the State Department." Let’s say it’s not fiction, although again we need specifics by country, then what? In Russia, is there a ban on women’s education? What about hijabs? Is Chechnya actually a Muslim republic within the federation? , if you don’t know. Next, let’s take Turkey for example. In Turkey, women are required to wear a hijab? No, can a woman get an education in Turkey?) How can that be? Muslim country. "Muslim countries are wild. I can’t say anything good about them, like most civilized and sensible people." (c) Dragonfly. Maybe it’s still worth looking at individual countries and individual laws, and not lumping everything into one pile?)

Besides, what right do you have to criticize other people’s laws? You don’t live there. You criticize the laws of the country of which you are a citizen, too?

"What I like most is that the person who has no family cares most about family values does not have. This is the paradox." This is a paradox only for such limited people as you, who lack critical thinking, not knowing the essence of the matter, they draw conclusions and try to be clever. Maybe I don’t have a family yet, precisely for the reason that I advocate the preservation of family values. Such a thought has never occurred to me? no matter what it really was, it’s certainly none of your business)

Sent after 4 minutes 40 seconds:

You understand, what you described above is not a heart attack.

I will be happy to read your conclusion on this topic, since this is not a heart attack, in your opinion, what is it?)

[etc]

The morality police detained Amini on September 13 in Tehran. The girl was sent to one of the Faraj centers, owned by the police department and military intelligence, for an explanatory conversation. There Mahsi suffered a heart attack, after which she was immediately taken to the hospital. Three days later, on September 16, she died.

Iranian President Ibrahim Raisi gave a speech in which he admitted that Mahsa Amini was beaten.

[BeachBunny]

Iranian President Ibrahim Raisi made a speech in which he admitted that the beating of Mahsa Amini took place.

Who is the source? Where can I see a video of the speech or at least read about this speech? This is the first. Second: the beating of a person and the death of a person may not be directly related, unless the death is a direct consequence of the beating.

[Venus]

on this topic, since it is not a heart attack

I can’t write anything on this topic. I did not manage this patient. There’s just nothing in what you described that indicates a heart attack.

[etc]

Iranian President Ibrahim Raisi made a speech in which he admitted that the beating of Mahsa Amini took place.

Who is the source? Where can I see a video of the speech or at least read about this speech? This is the first. Second: the beating of a person and the death of a person may not be directly related, unless the death is a direct consequence of the beating.

I don’t know English. This was the translation. Iranian President Ibrahim Raisi made a speech in which he admitted that the beating of Mahsa Amini took place, but stated that similar cases had happened in America, and the US authorities did not react to them.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XB2kGpDDNUM

[BeachBunny]

I don’t know English. This was the translation. Iranian President Ibrahim Raisi made a speech in which he admitted that the beating of Mahsa Amini took place, but stated that similar cases had happened in America, and the US authorities did not react to them.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XB2kGpDDNUM

Thanks, I’ll take a look later.

[Venus]

Iranian President Ibrahim Raisi made a speech in which he admitted that Mahsa Amini was beaten.

Who is the source? Where can I see a video of the speech or at least read about this speech? This is the first. Second: the beating of a person and the death of a person may not be directly related, unless the death is a direct consequence of the beating.

I don’t know English. This was the translation. Iranian President Ibrahim Raisi made a speech in which he admitted that the beating of Mahsa Amini took place, but stated that similar cases had happened in America, and the US authorities did not react to them.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XB2kGpDDNUM

We probably learned from ours. No matter what our problems are discussed, they begin to point at other countries. Of course, such unfortunate presidents should be driven out with a filthy broom. You need to be responsible for yourself, and not look for stupid excuses.

[Xenophon]

Again, the local Teletubbies are beginning to muddy the waters.
The interview given by the mother of the murdered woman was given under duress. Mass demonstrations in Iran regarding this event were apparently organized by the Anglo-Saxons.
All cases of the use of firearms in the United States are being investigated. And the whole world knows about this.
I would like to remind the Teletubbies about the interesting use of champagne bottles, which were put into use by our valiant law enforcement officers. Maybe we also have Anglo-Saxons working in the police?
Well, all sorts of hijabs, bans on education are also inventions of the State Department.
What I like most is that the person who cares most about family values ​​is the one who has no has no family. That’s the paradox.
And thanks to these tough Teletubbies, politics again spoiled an interesting topic.

nLet’s look at your writing, I can’t call this set of letters any other way)

"The interview given by the mother of the murdered woman was given under duress." Is there evidence of this? Have you seen the medical examination report, from which it could be concluded that the student died from violent acts, and not from the reasons described above in my comment?

"Mass demonstrations in Iran regarding this event were apparently organized by the Anglo-Saxons." Perhaps you don’t know where your legs come from, or perhaps they are the same as you, peddlers of democracy) Who organized mass demonstrations in Ukraine, Kazakhstan, in Belarus? Who organizes color revolutions here and there? Who sees tyrants and dictators everywhere?) Watch the video with Xi, who went to the USA the other day and what the senile Biden called him, and also look at Blinken’s reaction)

"All cases of use of firearms in the United States are investigated. And the whole world knows about it." They are investigating, what next?) If they had not been investigated, there would have been a massacre. "And the whole world knows about it" Are you by any chance a generous Ukrainian?) The thinking is very similar.
.
"I would like to remind the Teletubbies about the interesting use of champagne bottles, which were put into use by our valiant law enforcement officers. Maybe we also have Anglo-Saxons working in the police?" What does the bottle situation have to do with the topic being discussed? Are law enforcement officers in Russia killing people with champagne bottles? Did they kill a lot?

"Well, and all sorts of hijabs , bans on education are also inventions of the State Department." Let’s say it’s not fiction, although again specifics are needed by country, what next? Where do you live? In Russia? Is there a ban on women’s education in Chechnya? What about hijabs? Chechnya is actually a Muslim republic within the federation, if you are not aware. Next, take Turkey for example. Türkiye is a Muslim country. Are women required to wear a hijab in Turkey? No, you don’t have to. Can a woman in Turkey get an education? Maybe. Well, how can that be?) This is a Muslim country. "Muslim countries are wild. I can’t say anything good about them, like most civilized and sensible people." (c) Dragonfly. Maybe it’s still worth analyzing individual countries and individual laws, and not lumping everything into one pile?)

Besides, what right do you have to criticize other people’s laws? You don’t live there. You criticize the laws of the country of which you are a citizen. Do you also go to visit with your charter?

“What I like most is that the person who cares most about family values ​​is the one who doesn’t have any family. That’s the paradox." This is a paradox only for narrow-minded people like you, who, without critical thinking, without knowing the essence of the matter, draw conclusions and try to be clever. Maybe I don’t have a family yet, precisely for the reason that I advocate preserving family values? Has such a thought ever occurred to you?) Be that as it may, in fact, this is certainly none of your business)

Sent after 4 minutes 40 seconds:

You understand, what you described above is not heart attack.

I will be happy to read your conclusion on this topic, since this is not a heart attack, in your opinion, what is it?)

You know, it makes no sense to answer you. You are a stubborn Teletubby with delusions of grandeur.
Only a stubborn person confident in his own infallibility can demand proof of generally known facts.
I will not call a spade a spade here. With all my attitude towards your perception of reality, I will not just insult a person. I leave it to you to choose your own definition.
Are you a supporter of family values, what are you doing on this site? Do you want to find your match here? It’s funny.
And what does Blinken have to do with it?

[BeachBunny]

You know, it makes no sense to answer you. You are a stubborn teletubby suffering from delusions of grandeur.
Only a stubborn person confident in his own infallibility can demand proof of well-known facts.
I will not call a spade a spade here. With all my attitude towards your perception of reality, I will not just insult a person. I leave it to you to choose your own definition.
You are a champion of family values, what are you doing on this site? Do you want to find your match here? It’s funny.
And what does Blinken have to do with it?

Your conclusions about me and your opinion about me does not interest me. You can indulge in demagoguery, but in essence you have something to say? No? I thought so)

[etc]

We probably learned from ours. No matter what our problems are discussed, they begin to point at other countries. Of course, such unfortunate presidents should be driven out with a filthy broom. You need to be responsible for yourself, and not look for stupid excuses

And I have a positive attitude towards Iran).

[Xenophon]

You know, it makes no sense to answer you. You are a stubborn teletubby suffering from delusions of grandeur.
Only a stubborn person confident in his own infallibility can demand proof of well-known facts.
I will not call a spade a spade here. With all my attitude towards your perception of reality, I will not just insult a person. I leave it to you to choose your own definition.
You are a champion of family values, what are you doing on this site? Do you want to find your match here? It’s funny.
And what does Blinken have to do with it?

Your conclusions about me and your opinion about me does not interest me. You can indulge in demagoguery, but in essence you have something to say? No? That’s what I thought)

I seriously doubt that you know how to think. It’s not yours. The TV thinks for you. You can only broadcast the droppings that pour out of there.
And it is impossible to tell you anything substantive; you will require a certificate from the Ministry of Defense, from the Ministry of Health, from the League of Sexual Reforms, and finally, certified by the Secretary of the Security Council under the President of the Russian Federation.
If you don’t understand something, ask Ramzan Kadyrov, or even better, ask the hero of Tatarstan his son. He knows how to explain everything clearly.

[Venus]

They probably learned from ours. No matter what our problems are discussed, they begin to point at other countries. Of course, such unfortunate presidents should be driven out with a filthy broom. You need to be responsible for yourself, and not look for stupid excuses

And I have a positive attitude towards Iran).

What’s good there?

[etc]

We probably learned from ours. No matter what our problems are discussed, they begin to point at other countries. Of course, such unfortunate presidents should be driven out with a filthy broom. You need to be responsible for yourself, and not look for stupid excuses

And I have a positive attitude towards Iran).

What’s good about it?

There are a lot of prejudices around Iran. The Americans are terrorizing the country, involving the West. Iran has a lot of oil and gas and Iran did not want to bend to the Americans. So they show them to the whole world as savages.

[Gudgeon]

but communication on the forum is a violation of serial monogamy?

O.o I really hope not: In general , what does a forum have to do with relationships? We’re not even dating, and especially since there are no “romantic” relationships or sex here. There’s not even flirting.

But how will your partner/partner, husband/wife react when she finds out that you are here?
This is a question for everyone

Can I answer with a counter question: do you think that your spouse needs to be told everything, everything, down to the last detail? Even if he doesn’t need it and it’s unpleasant? There are a lot of things that people don’t talk about. From dirty little secrets of bad and shameful moments, to current everyday incidents.
If by your actions you DO NOT cause harm, but your confession can cause it, then who needs it, this confession?
In general, mine opinion - he doesn’t know and okay, this is my private communication zone. I don’t read her correspondence with her friends on her phone, and I think that my correspondence on the forum is also my personal business.

[Venus]

And I have a positive attitude towards Iran).

What good is there ?

There are many prejudices around Iran. The Americans are terrorizing the country, involving the West. Iran has a lot of oil and gas and Iran did not want to bend to the Americans. So they show them to the whole world as savages.

))) I asked what was good about them)))
I All these idiomatic expressions, such as bending under, kneeling, kneeling and the like, cause a smile and evoke sadness at the same time. People just want to live normally, and not be afraid to violate the mass of restrictions that the state has imposed on them. The only thing worse than Iran is North Korea. We are also following their path, slowly but surely, and it’s sad, actually.

[BeachBunny]

I don’t know English. This was the translation. Iranian President Ibrahim Raisi made a speech in which he admitted that the beating of Mahsa Amini took place, but stated that similar cases had happened in America, and the US authorities did not react to them.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XB2kGpDDNUM

Thanks, I’ll look later.

I watched the video, there is no recognition there. The Iranian President spoke about the investigation into the incident, his contact with the girl’s family, human rights, and deaths at the hands of security forces in Western countries, particularly in the UK, where he cited the example of the 81st death of women at the hands of security forces. In general, I would rather listen to a direct translation from Persian into Russian.

[Venus]

I don’t know English. This was the translation. Iranian President Ibrahim Raisi made a speech in which he admitted that the beating of Mahsa Amini took place, but stated that similar cases had happened in America, and the US authorities did not react to them.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XB2kGpDDNUM

Thanks, I’ll look later.

I watched the video, there is no recognition there. The Iranian President spoke about the investigation into the incident, his contact with the girl’s family, human rights, and deaths at the hands of security forces in Western countries, particularly in the UK, where he cited the example of the 81st death of women at the hands of security forces. In general, I would rather listen to a direct translation from Persian into Russian.

I think that there will be exactly as much truth as they need. So, no matter what language you listen to, you would not hear anything new.

[BeachBunny]

Strecoza, the absence of restrictions and responsibility leads to permissiveness, and permissiveness leads to lawlessness and chaos.

[Venus]

Strecoza, the absence of restrictions and responsibility leads to permissiveness, and permissiveness leads to lawlessness and chaos.

There should be a minimum of restrictions, and the law should apply to everyone without exception. Then there will be order. Well, when the law is like a drawbar, whichever way you turn, that’s where it ends up. There will be no order.

[BeachBunny]

There should be a minimum of restrictions, and the law should apply to everyone without exception. Then there will be order. Well, when the law is like a drawbar, whichever way you turn, that’s where it ends up. There will be no order.

I agree that the law should apply to everyone without exception. "There should be a minimum of restrictions" (c), but this statement is very controversial) Order is a very subjective and relative concept)

[Venus]

There should be a minimum of restrictions, and the law should apply to everyone without exception. Then there will be order. Well, when the law is like a drawbar, whichever way you turn, that’s where it ends up. There will be no order.

I agree that the law should apply to everyone without exception. "There should be a minimum of restrictions" (c), but this statement is very controversial) Order is a very subjective and relative concept)

Order is a creation comfortable environment for people. Order at home, at work, in the city, in the country. Let’s take traffic violations. They constantly introduce new fines and raise old ones. Does this somehow contribute to order? No. They suggested that after a number of violations a person should be sent for retake, and after a relapse of violations aggravated by alcohol or drug intoxication, the vehicle should be confiscated and the driver’s license deprived for life. Could this help restore order? It could, but no one does it.
There are many prohibitions associated with smoking. In particular, it is prohibited on trains. If you smoke in the vestibule, you will be fined. Is this order? No, the order will be when they make smoking rooms on trains.
You can send a person. You will be fined. You can send again and again and again. Is this order? You can hit a person and also pay a fine. You can break the glass and you will be fined.
You can kill a person and you will be imprisoned. You can be killed and the person who killed you will be imprisoned. Is this order?
There is no order. But there are more and more restrictions.

[Serg_A]

This is a kind of ordering of promiscuous sexual relations. That is, there are still more than one connections, but each subsequent one begins only after the previous one has ended

Well, that is, I have one wife, one mistress . My mistress has me and her lover)))

[Venus]

This is a kind of ordering of promiscuous sexual relations. That is, there are still more than one connections, but each subsequent one begins only after the previous one has ended

Well, that is, I have one wife, one mistress . My mistress has me and her lover)))

))) This is no longer monogamy. This is polyamory.

[BeachBunny]

Order is the creation of a comfortable environment for people.

Not a fact) For some people, some conditions will be comfortable, for others - others. Restrictions do not equal order, but there is no order without restrictions) Order is a set of certain rules, and not specific restrictions) Bad order is better than complete chaos.

"If ​​you light a cigarette in the vestibule, you will be fined. Is this the order?" (c). Yes, that’s the order, if those are the rules. "No, the order will be when they make smoking rooms on trains." (c). Order is when people stop smoking and poisoning themselves and others. In other words, as I said, order is a subjective and relative concept. In principle, there is no ideal order, just like there are no ideal people.

[Alice]

We’re not even dating, and especially since there are no “romantic” relationships or sex here. There’s not even flirting.

How not? No one has it at all?

[Venus]

Order is the creation of a comfortable environment for people.

Not a fact) For some people, some conditions will be comfortable, for others - others. Restrictions do not equal order, but there is no order without restrictions) Order is a set of certain rules, and not specific restrictions) Bad order is better than complete chaos.

"If ​​you light a cigarette in the vestibule, you will be fined. Is this the order?" (c). Yes, that’s the order, if those are the rules. "No, the order will be when they make smoking rooms on trains." (c). Order is when people stop smoking and poisoning themselves and others. In other words, as I said, order is a subjective and relative concept. In principle, there is no ideal order, just like there are no ideal people.

Nobody talks about ideal order. It’s just that restrictions don’t bring order. People still smoke in vestibules because they have nowhere else to smoke, but now if they get caught they get a fine.
Bad order is disorder, and disorder is chaos. Restrictions are manipulation and nothing more.

[Alice]

Can I answer with a counter question: do you think that you need to tell your spouse everything, everything, down to the last detail?

If suddenly you or yourself will he know?

[Serg_A]

This is a kind of ordering of promiscuity. That is, there are still more than one connections, but each subsequent one begins only after the previous one has ended

Well, that is, I have one wife, one mistress . My mistress has me and her lover)))

))) This is no longer monogamy. This is polyamory.

Then I am for polyamory.

[Venus]

Order is the creation of a comfortable environment for people.

There are many prohibitions associated with smoking. In particular, it is prohibited on trains. If you smoke in the vestibule, you will be fined.

Smoking in the vestibule has stopped on trains - that’s a fact. As a non-smoker, I am very happy about this. This is creating a comfortable environment for non-smokers.

And we could also create a comfortable environment for smokers by making a smoking area. But we don’t care about people’s comfort.

[BeachBunny]

Nobody talks about ideal order. It’s just that restrictions don’t bring order. People still smoke in vestibules because they have nowhere else to smoke, but now if they get caught they get a fine.
Bad order is disorder, and disorder is chaos. Restrictions are manipulation and nothing more.

Bad order is bad order. You have such a mindset, partly because you have nothing to compare with) I am sure that you have never had to manage large groups of people and with such a mindset you would not have achieved success) Send you somewhere, say, to Somalia, so that you feel the difference and saw where the border between lawlessness and conventional order may lie. Restrictions are part of the regulatory system.
"People smoked in vestibules and still smoke because there is nowhere else, but now if they catch your eye they get a fine." (c) Everything is relative,
including restrictions, for example, if instead of a fine these smokers had their fingers broken every time they smoke in the wrong place, there would be many fewer violators) The problem is not in the restrictions, but in their effectiveness.

Restrictions are manipulation and nothing more.

Really) Then can the restrictions be lifted, say, for killing people?) For rape?) For grievous bodily harm?) Continue yourself. This is just manipulation)

[Venus]

Nobody talks about perfect order. It’s just that restrictions don’t bring order. People still smoke in vestibules because they have nowhere else to smoke, but now if they get caught they get a fine.
Bad order is disorder, and disorder is chaos. Restrictions are manipulation and nothing more.

Bad order is bad order. You have such a mindset, partly because you have nothing to compare with) I am sure that you have never had to manage large groups of people and with such a mindset you would not have achieved success) Send you somewhere, say, to Somalia, so that you feel the difference and saw where the border between lawlessness and conventional order may lie. Restrictions are part of the regulatory system.
"People smoked in vestibules and still smoke because there is nowhere else, but now if they catch your eye they get a fine." (c) Everything is relative,
including restrictions, for example, if instead of a fine these smokers had their fingers broken every time they smoke in the wrong place, there would be many fewer violators) The problem is not in the restrictions, but in their effectiveness.

Restrictions are manipulation and nothing more.

Really) Then can the restrictions be lifted, say, for killing people?) For rape?) For grievous bodily harm?) Continue yourself. This is just manipulation)

How can the restriction on murder be lifted? Do we have a limit on killing? Do you understand that you wrote complete nonsense?
And, tell me about Somalia. How long did you live there?
Well, tell us how many people are in the team you manage.

[Bully Carrie]

Serial monogamy. What do you think about this?

Most likely, serial monogamy is a chain of failures in your personal life. Or, on the contrary, good luck, and each time you get more and more lucky)
I dated one boyfriend, broke up, met another... We didn’t have the same personalities, temperaments... And then I met my current husband, and serial monogamy is on this is the end: lucky)

[Gudgeon]

How not? No one has it at all?

Well, judging by what I see on the forum, it’s unlikely that anyone here met in real life and it came down to sex And to call this a romantic relationship: "look at my pussy/tits/cock! Wow cool, I would fuck you" (what is most of it here) - well, no :) This is some kind of crap. I don’t know, maybe in someone’s PM there virt will happen, but in essence this is also a handjob in front of the keyboard.

If suddenly he or she finds out?

Well, I found out. There was somehow no joy, there were slight complaints, but somehow it was forgotten. Fortunately, she doesn’t know the account - it goes out automatically. So I just saw what I was reading. Sometimes I even think that it would be good for her to know and read... in order to indirectly become familiar with what I am missing. But I think it won’t draw the correct (or necessary) conclusions. And instead of discussion and movement along the path of mutual understanding, there will be only insults and reproaches.

[Bully Carrie]

He says that he is indirectly present on the forum).

So let him register and write! We really, really lack normal, real women here! They exist, but there are too many of them!

[Bully Carrie]

But I think it won’t draw the correct (or necessary) conclusions. And instead of discussion and movement along the path of mutual understanding, there will be only insults and reproaches

Why do you think so?

[Gudgeon]

Why do you think so?

Well, I’ve known her for more than 10 years... I can predict reactions based on previous experience. Attempts at direct conversations failed in the same way, although I was as tactful as possible.

[Bully Carrie]

Attempts at direct conversations failed in the same way, although I was as tactful as possible.

Well, the one walking will master the road, there is no need to stop. You know, the hardest loneliness is loneliness together.

[BeachBunny]

How can the restriction on murder be lifted? Do we have a limit on killing? Do you understand that you wrote complete nonsense?
And, tell me about Somalia. How long did you live there?
Well, tell us how many people are in the team you manage.

I’m speaking hypothetically and deliberately exaggerated, so that It’s dawned on you that it’s you who’s talking nonsense, but for some reason it doesn’t dawn on you anyway) Read about Somalia yourself, you have the Internet, and then tell me about “order” and “comfort.”) There’s no need there live in order to understand certain things)

I led different groups of people at different times, ranging from very small (5-7 people) to quite large ones from plus or minus 70 to 150 you person.

[Gudgeon]

Well, the one walking will master the road, there is no need to stop. You know, the hardest loneliness is loneliness together.

You can’t always find the strength to try again, unfortunately. Because the "recoil" is quite unpleasant when an attempt is unsuccessful. I think a person is either ready to discuss this or not. It’s impossible to force, you can wait for it to “grow up” to the point of discussion. True, there is a great chance of not waiting. Therefore, I try to speak... but not too often, as the internal mana accumulates for this

[Bully Carrie]

It’s impossible to force, you can wait for it to “grow up” to the point of discussion.

Well, or so. Good luck, anyway.

[Venus]

BeachBunny, do you consider a team of 70-150 people to be large? And, you forgot to write about Somalia.
Well, in general, we have left the topic of conversation. You yourself wrote that it’s not the restrictions, but their effectiveness. Well, our restrictions are not effective, but they are amazing in their quantity and we realize with horror that this is not the limit. Well, the fact that the law acts selectively does not leave us even reliable for any justice in this life.

[BeachBunny]

Well, judging by what I see on the forum, it’s unlikely that anyone here actually met in real life and it came down to sex

If you consider that here the ratio of women to men is 1 to 10, if not more, then what kind of meetings are we talking about in real life?) I admit that someone did meet, but this is rather a very rare exception. In addition, I can say with a certain degree of confidence that the majority of citizens who are describing here whatever mind-blowing debauchery they would create in real life, I will express myself correctly so as not to offend anyone, are ready to organize this very debauchery only in their fantasies, nothing more, this applies to both men and women)

[Sweden125]

But how will your partner/partner, husband/wife react when she finds out that you are here?
This is a question for everyone

Mine accepts my presence here normally. She laughed a lot when I posted my photo.

mine also has no pretensions in the know!

[BeachBunny]

Strecoza, the point is not whether I think the team large or small, the fact is that I have successful experience managing groups of people for over 5 years, their size is of secondary importance. To be an effective leader, you need to be able to make the right decisions, even if they are unpopular and sometimes very tough. This is all about the topic of rules and restrictions.