Serial monogamy

[Venus]

Serial monogamy. What do you think about this?

[Mongoose]

So what do you mean specifically family relationships?

[Venus]

Does this mean specifically family relationships?

No, any

[Mongoose]

Does this mean family relationships?

No, any

It’s difficult to answer, they probably exist!................But on the other hand......who will tell the truth to the end!?

[Gudgeon]

Serial monogamy.

I don’t really understand this phrase. Explain what you mean? What series?

[Venus]

Serial monogamy.

I don’t really understand this phrase. Explain what you mean? What series?

This is a kind of ordering of promiscuity. That is, there are still more than one connections, but each subsequent one begins only after the previous one has ended.
There are characters on the forum who go around the topics and criticize that the topics here are one more stupid than the other. It was very interesting to see them here, but they are not there.

[Gudgeon]

each subsequent one begins only after the previous one has ended.

You very accurately described my life before marriage. Although it is difficult to say that I had many sexual relationships, I never had parallel ones. If I decided that I was no longer comfortable here or that I wanted sex elsewhere, I broke off the relationship and moved on. But such a situation where I am with one person today, tomorrow with another, and then again with that one... has never happened before.

[Venus]

each subsequent one begins only after the previous one has ended.

You very accurately described my life before marriage. Although it is difficult to say that I had many sexual relationships, I never had parallel ones. If I decided that I was no longer comfortable here or that I wanted sex elsewhere, I broke off the relationship and moved on. But such a situation where I am with one person today, tomorrow with another, and then again with that one... has never happened before.

So I wanted to hear from members of the forum how this happens for them. I do not exclude that there are those who have many connections at the moment, but as I see it, the majority, like you, start the next one after finishing the previous one.

[Gudgeon]

Strecoza, I’m reading the forum, and I’m not at all I’m sure: some people like it when they have a wife in front of them, others like to fuck a bunch of women at the same time, a third like to expose their ass to everyone (and men too), a fourth like to have threesomes, a fifth like to force their partner to please someone... No, I’m not judging Who am I for this, everyone decides for themselves. But it seems to me that I’m some kind of retrogastic mastodon, that I’m the only one - I sleep only with my wife (or don’t sleep when it doesn’t allow it). So tell me, as a psychiatrist, since I stand out from the general mass, does it turn out to be me - with deviations? After all, the norm is determined by the majority. And judging by the forum, the Belshino people are either cheating left and right or generally believe that the concept of fidelity in a relationship is atavism, nonsense and laughter.

[Amateur123]

There are different situations, most often these relationships follow a sequence, but it also happens when they develop in parallel.

[Venus]

Strecoza, I’m reading the forum, and I’m not at all sure: some people like it when they have a wife in front of them, others like to fuck a bunch of women at the same time, others like to expose their ass to everyone (and men too), a fourth like to have threesomes, a fifth like to force their partner to please someone... No , I don’t judge who I am for this, everyone decides for themselves. But it seems to me that I’m some kind of retrogastic mastodon, that I’m the only one - I sleep only with my wife (or don’t sleep when it doesn’t allow it). So tell me, as a psychiatrist, since I stand out from the general mass, does it turn out to be me - with deviations? After all, the norm is determined by the majority. And judging by the forum, Belshinstvo either cheats left and right or generally believes that the concept of fidelity in a relationship is atavism, nonsense and laughter.

The norm is never the majority was not determined. Although the norm in medicine is regularly revised, this does not depend on the majority, but on new data in science.
Well, the forum is 99 percent fantasy. Ah, fantasizing is good for the brain)))
So you are the most normal of all the normal ones.

[Watchman]

Serial monogamy. What do you think about this?

I think that this is bullshit
And it suits animals more than people.

[Gudgeon]

Well, okay, then I’ll exhale and go and dream up some topic

Sent after 1 minute 30 seconds:
Watchman, have you lived with the same woman all your life?

[BeachBunny]

The theory of serial monogamy came from the West and its essence is that, according to some Western "experts", modern relationships between a man and a woman have transformed into repeated monogamous relationships and this is a kind of development. That the norm is to enter into a relationship, marriage, conception, divorce, for everything about 3-5 years and repeat the cycle. What is there in practice? In practice, other relationships begin without leaving the current ones, betrayal, open relationships, promiscuity. Entry into a relationship, marriage, possible conception of a child, divorce, new relationship, possible marriage, but in many repeated relationships, conception often does not occur, especially if there is already a child or even two from the first marriage. If we take Muslim countries, then there is no serial monogamy there and never was. In other words, the theory of serial monogamy is another game that was born in the West, and is directly related to the destruction of the institution of family and the rejection of traditional values.

P.S. The theory of serial monogamy is actively promoted in Russia by so-called sexologists/psychologists.

[Watchman]

The theory of serial monogamy came from the West and its essence is that, according to some Western "specialists", modern relationships between a man and a woman have transformed into repeated monogamous relationships and this is a kind of development. That the norm is to enter into a relationship, marriage, conception, divorce, for everything about 3-5 years and repeat the cycle. What is there in practice? In practice, other relationships begin without leaving the current ones, betrayal, open relationships, promiscuity. Entry into a relationship, marriage, possible conception of a child, divorce, new relationship, possible marriage, but in many repeated relationships, conception often does not occur, especially if there is already a child or even two from the first marriage. If we take Muslim countries, then there is no serial monogamy there and never was. In other words, the theory of serial monogamy is another game that was born in the West, and is directly related to the destruction of the institution of family and the rejection of traditional values.

P.S. The theory of serial monogamy is actively promoted in Russia by so-called sexologists/psychologists.

a decent name for whores and males

[Venus]

The theory of serial monogamy came from the West and its essence is that, according to some Western "specialists", modern relationships between a man and a woman have transformed into repeated monogamous relationships and this is a kind of development. That the norm is to enter into a relationship, marriage, conception, divorce, for everything about 3-5 years and repeat the cycle. What is there in practice? In practice, other relationships begin without leaving the current ones, betrayal, open relationships, promiscuity. Entry into a relationship, marriage, possible conception of a child, divorce, new relationship, possible marriage, but in many repeated relationships, conception often does not occur, especially if there is already a child or even two from the first marriage. If we take Muslim countries, then there is no serial monogamy there and never was. In other words, the theory of serial monogamy is another game that was born in the West, and is directly related to the destruction of the institution of family and the rejection of traditional values.

P.S. The theory of serial monogamy is actively promoted in Russia by so-called sexologists/psychologists.

Muslim countries are wild. I can’t say anything good about them, like most civilized and sensible people.

[Watchman]

Okay, then I’ll breathe out and go and dream up some topic

Sent after 1 minute 30 seconds:
Watchman , have you lived your whole life with one woman?

I’m still living, but if I have to I’ll finish the other one at the beginning with the previous one.

[Amateur123]

Strecoza,
normality, this is one from forms of madness!))

[Watchman]

The theory of serial monogamy came from the West and its essence is that, according to some Western "specialists", modern relationships between a man and a woman have transformed into repeated monogamous relationships and this is a kind of development. That the norm is to enter into a relationship, marriage, conception, divorce, for everything about 3-5 years and repeat the cycle. What is there in practice? In practice, other relationships begin without leaving the current ones, betrayal, open relationships, promiscuity. Entry into a relationship, marriage, possible conception of a child, divorce, new relationship, possible marriage, but in many repeated relationships, conception often does not occur, especially if there is already a child or even two from the first marriage. If we take Muslim countries, then there is no serial monogamy there and never was. In other words, the theory of serial monogamy is another game that was born in the West, and is directly related to the destruction of the institution of family and the rejection of traditional values.

P.S. The theory of serial monogamy is actively promoted in Russia by so-called sexologists/psychologists.

Muslim countries are wild. I can’t say anything good about them, like most civilized and sensible people.

What do you include in the concept of civilized?

[Venus]

The theory of serial monogamy came from the West and its essence is that, according to some Western "experts", modern relationships between a man and a woman have transformed into repeated monogamous relationships and this is its kind of development. That the norm is to enter into a relationship, marriage, conception, divorce, for everything about 3-5 years and repeat the cycle. What is there in practice? In practice, other relationships begin without leaving the current ones, betrayal, open relationships, promiscuity. Entry into a relationship, marriage, possible conception of a child, divorce, new relationship, possible marriage, but in many repeated relationships, conception often does not occur, especially if there is already a child or even two from the first marriage. If we take Muslim countries, then there is no serial monogamy there and never was. In other words, the theory of serial monogamy is another game that was born in the West, and is directly related to the destruction of the institution of family and the rejection of traditional values.

P.S. The theory of serial monogamy is actively promoted in Russia by so-called sexologists/psychologists.

Muslim countries are wild. I can’t say anything good about them, like most civilized and sensible people.

What do you include in the concept of civilized?

Are we talking to you again?

[BeachBunny]

Muslim countries are wild. I can’t say anything good about them, like most civilized and sensible people.

You blurted out some nonsense, I can’t characterize your comment any other way) B What is the savagery of Muslim countries in general or specifically for countries?) Or do you think these countries are wild because they are Muslim?) Otherwise what is happening in the so-called civilized countries is not savagery?)

[Gudgeon]

I’m still living

Let me not believe that you have slept with one woman in your entire life.

if it pulls to another at the beginning I will end up with the previous one.

Well, how is this different then? That’s what decent people do.

other relationships begin without leaving the current ones, infidelity, open relationships

But they don’t do that.
That’s the whole difference.

[Venus]

Muslim countries are wild. I can’t say anything good about them, like most civilized and sensible people.

You blurted out some nonsense, I can’t characterize your comment any other way) B What is the savagery of Muslim countries in general or specifically for countries?) Or do you think these countries are wild because they are Muslim?) Otherwise what is happening in the so-called civilized countries is not savagery?)

Wild towards women.

[BeachBunny]

Wild towards women.

You think in stereotypes, like a victim of propaganda. Just because a country is Muslim does not mean that women are treated poorly. It is necessary to compare specific countries with specific laws, and not mix everything into one pile.

[Venus]

Wild towards women.

You think in stereotypes, like a victim of propaganda. Just because a country is Muslim does not mean that women are treated poorly. It is necessary to compare specific countries with specific laws, and not mix everything into one pile.

Well, in Iran, the police killed a girl for what she was wearing not this way. Do you understand that they can’t kill people for not wearing the right clothes?

[BeachBunny]

Well, in Iran, the police killed a girl because she was dressed the wrong way. Do you understand that they can’t kill people for not dressing properly?

Isn’t this the same recent story where police in Iran allegedly killed a girl?

[Venus]

Well, in Iran, the police killed a girl because she was dressed the wrong way. Do you understand that they can’t kill people for not wearing the right clothes?

Isn’t this the same recent story where police in Iran allegedly killed a girl?

Not allegedly, but killed. You can write a lot about these countries and nothing good

[Amateur123]

Strecoza,
Please don’t I agree, in our Christian country, someone who is not adequate can easily kill a person just like that, and it won’t matter to him.

[BeachBunny]

If you had turned on your brain and looked for information, and not read custom articles, you would have found a video where they completely exposed and refuted this stuff about a student killed by the police, but why do you need that?) It’s easier to read some crap that coincides with don’t think any further about your opinion) In the USA, the police can kill a person “once” out of the blue, and many are killed under ridiculous circumstances, I don’t see any indignation on your part about such lawlessness, or is it something else?)

Or how do you think it works?) Let them extinguish whoever they want, but not women?)

[Gudgeon]

Amateur123, try it. You will find out how nothing will happen for this. I work in the judicial sphere... The detection rate for murders is not 100%, of course, but not bad (officially 99%, but this is bullshit). And the chance of going to places not so distant from 6 to 15, especially if you have no experience, will be above 90%.

[Amateur123]

Gudgeon,
It is not possible to drive to places such distant things are one thing, but taking a person’s life is another matter, and now consider the severity of the deed and the measure of retribution.
Think at your leisure.

[Gudgeon]

In the USA, the police can kill a person "once" out of the blue

They cannot kill anyone "once." There will be a debriefing. And if the video was turned off, then you were in trouble (and almost everyone there is equipped with mandatory video recording). They really have the right to kill if a threat to a police officer is visible. And all you have to do is reach into your pocket. But not out of nowhere. The law there is designed to protect the police, and rightly so. So that any provocation could result in death. This provides subordination civilian legal requirements of the police.

Sent after 1 minute 41 seconds:
Amateur123, I don’t need it think at your leisure, the injustice of the system is obvious. I would punish murder as in the USA - with the death penalty. But that’s not the point. Well, you blurted out "nothing will happen", and this, to put it mildly, is not true.

[Venus]

If you had turned on your brain and looked for information, and not read custom articles, you would have found a video where this stuff about a student killed by police was completely exposed and refuted, but why do you need that?) It’s easier to read some crap, which coincides with your opinion and don’t think further) In the USA, the police can kill a person “once” out of the blue and many are killed under ridiculous circumstances, somehow I don’t see any indignation on your part about such lawlessness, or is it something else?)

Or how do you think it works?) Let them extinguish whoever they want, but not women?)

Instead of writing so much, you would just find me that video and that’s it.

[Amateur123]

Gudgeon,
I didn’t blurt out, but he said he was throwing shit into the ditch. This is the time.
And you think that serving six years for premeditated murder is punishment for taking a person’s life!

[BeachBunny]

They cannot kill anyone "at once". There will be a debriefing. And if the video was turned off, then you were in trouble (and almost everyone there is equipped with mandatory video recording). They really have the right to kill if a threat to a police officer is visible. And all you have to do is reach into your pocket. But not out of nowhere. The law there is designed to protect the police, and rightly so. So that any provocation could result in death. This provides subordination civilian legal demands of the police.

First, look for videos from body cameras where police kill people in the United States out of the blue with virtually no visible danger for a policeman, and then tell me that it’s not on the count of “one,” but even on the count of “two” or “three,” it doesn’t change the essence. It is not in Russia to fight with the police, bully, get into a fight, throw a knife, they will shoot you on the spot and no one will be imprisoned, even if there is a trial, well, they will be suspended or transferred, as a last resort.

Sent after 3 minutes 54 seconds:

Instead of writing so much, you would just find I need that video and that’s it.

I won’t look for the video, it’s long, and I’m getting ready to take a shower and go to bed) I’ll post the article. There was more information in the video, there was video from cameras and a video where the student’s mother voiced the cause of her daughter’s death and denied the stuffing.
You need to register to see the link.

[Venus]

They can’t kill anyone “at once.” There will be a debriefing. And if the video was turned off, then you were in trouble (and almost everyone there is equipped with mandatory video recording). They really have the right to kill if a threat to a police officer is visible. And all you have to do is reach into your pocket. But not out of nowhere. The law there is designed to protect the police, and rightly so. So that any provocation could result in death. This provides subordination civilian legal demands of the police.

First, look for videos from body cameras where police kill people in the United States out of the blue with virtually no visible danger for a policeman, and then tell me that it’s not on the count of “one,” but even on the count of “two” or “three,” it doesn’t change the essence. It is not in Russia to fight with the police, bully, get into a fight, throw a knife, they will shoot you on the spot and no one will be imprisoned, even if there is a trial, well, they will be suspended or transferred, as a last resort.

Sent after 3 minutes 54 seconds:

Instead of writing so much, you would just find I need that video and that’s it.

I won’t look for the video, it’s long, and I’m getting ready to take a shower and go to bed) I’ll post the article https://news.rambler.ru/other/ 49382164- ... kspertiza/ There was more information in the video, there was video from cameras and a video where the student’s mother voiced the cause of her daughter’s death and denied the stuffing.

This article says “Amini’s case continues to be investigated. Now they are waiting for the results of the examination to establish the exact cause of the girl’s death."

[Gudgeon]

Amateur123, re-read the above, maybe you’ll get it.

Sent after 3 minutes 5 seconds:

You first look for the video

I’ve seen a bunch of them. And I read about the analysis using these videos. And you apparently know about the seriousness of analysis after the fact only from cheap TV series and all sorts of fleas in a sweater. The use of lethal force there is an extraordinary event. For most police officers, it never happens once in their lives. And if it happened, it’s an ass, because they will be cowards for a very long time.

It’s not in Russia to fight with the police, bully, get into a fight, throw in a knife, they’ll shoot you on the spot and won’t jail anyone

And this is very correct. It should be.

[Amateur123]

Gudgeon,
Don’t try to pretend You’re not smart enough.
So it’s clear that you’re around, but no more.

[Happens]

Serial monogamy. What do you think about this?

It’s quite a hot topic if you think that we are talking about a mother who alternates between the members of her husband and son, and the daughter of her brother and father ...

[Gudgeon]

Amateur123, it’s funny to read this from a person who is not capable 2 lines master.

[Watchman]

Serial monogamy. What do you think about this?

what do you mean by this term?

Sent after 1 minute 36 seconds:

Let me not believe that you have slept with one woman in your entire life.

perhaps you misunderstood me, I live in a marriage with one woman without entering into intimate contacts with others.

[Keep the change for yourself]

Serial monogamy. What do you think about this?

Learn new words again

Sent after 4 minutes 48 seconds:
Lick Without!

What is serial monogamy? Serial monogamy is a form of relationship in which people quickly move from one relationship to another. That is, a person cannot remain alone and is in a hurry to immerse himself in a new relationship. In this case, a new partner appears only after the previous one is left behind. Read more: You need to register to see the link.

[Xenophon]

Once again the local Teletubbies are starting to muddy the waters.
The interview given by the mother of the murdered woman was given under duress. Mass demonstrations in Iran regarding this event were apparently organized by the Anglo-Saxons.
All cases of firearms use in the United States are investigated. And the whole world knows about it.
I would like to remind the Teletubbies of the interesting use of champagne bottles that our valiant law enforcement officers put into use. Maybe we also have Anglo-Saxons working in the police?
Well, all sorts of hijabs and bans on education are also inventions of the State Department.
What I like most is that the person who cares most about family values ​​is the one who doesn’t have any family. That’s the paradox.
And thanks to these tough Teletubbies, they again spoiled an interesting topic with politics.

[Watchman]

Again, the local Teletubbies are starting to muddy the waters.
The interview given by the mother of the murdered woman was given under duress. Mass demonstrations in Iran regarding this event were apparently organized by the Anglo-Saxons.
All cases of firearms use in the United States are investigated. And the whole world knows about it.
I would like to remind the Teletubbies of the interesting use of champagne bottles that our valiant law enforcement officers put into use. Maybe we also have Anglo-Saxons working in the police?
Well, all sorts of hijabs and bans on education are also inventions of the State Department.
What I like most is that the person who cares most about family values ​​is the one who doesn’t have any family. That’s the paradox.
And thanks to these tough Teletubbies, politics again spoiled an interesting topic.

And Dragonfly became the first Teletubbie?

[Xenophon]

Serial monogamy. What do you think about this?

Learn new words again

Sent after 4 minutes 48 seconds:
Lick Without!

What is serial monogamy? Serial monogamy is a form of relationship in which people quickly move from one relationship to another. That is, a person cannot remain alone and is in a hurry to immerse himself in a new relationship. In this case, a new partner appears only after the previous one is left behind. Read more: You need to register to see the link.

Everything is correct. The main thing in this definition is monogamy. This is how the vast majority of people live before marriage. And it even happens after marriage, after divorce they enter into another marriage. This is completely normal. You can’t declare celibacy after the end of your first relationship with your partner.
This is not the case in Muslim countries. But they found another way out. Harems and the ability to have four wives.
They have polygamy instead of serial monogamy.

[Alice]

This is the first time I’ve heard such a term.
I read the article.
About spouses looking to the left - everything is clear with that, but communication on the forum is a violation of serial monogamy?

nMonogamy is a form of family and marriage, a relationship between two people in which a person has only one partner.

Monogamy for men is a long-term relationship with only one person. So, if a man is married to a woman, then according to the principles of monogamy, he maintains a romantic relationship and has sex only with his wife. He doesn’t cheat, lives with his wife and plans a future only with her.

But in general, it’s some kind of nonsense...everyone decides for themselves whether to have a parallel relationship or not in each specific case under specific circumstances. This can save someone, and destroy someone.
What matters more is the same attitude of both partners towards this...someone walks to the left and allows his wife, but together they are satisfied and happy...and someone takes up a knife at the slightest suspicion..

You need to register to see the link.

[Keep the change for yourself]

But communication on the forum is a violation of serial monogamy?

I still think about it myself

[Alice]

Markul, but if you do not show romantic feelings to anyone -either you don’t lie, or perhaps you don’t violate it.

But how will your partner/partner, husband/wife react when she finds out that you are here?
This question for everyone.

[Keep the change for yourself]

But how will your partner, husband/wife react when they find out what you write here?

This question has already been asked on the forum.

The question will definitely be, what did I forget in such a place?

[Venus]

what did I forget in such a place?

))) And how will you answer it? What did you forget in such a place?))))