Ella: ↑13 Jul 2022, 00:18
This is called a polyamorous relationship. There are women who give birth to the same man and all live together.
I think that there are many positive aspects in all this. But one way or another, the relationships within this triangle must be cemented by love. That is, all three need to love each other. That is, not just two for two, but specifically for all three to like each other and love each other. And I think this is precisely the complexity of such relationships.
Although this is not the only problem.
Another and no less important is socialization. That is, how to legitimize all this so that all three have equal rights and so that no one is offended?
What about registering the marriage? With whom exactly? Surely a man can’t sign with both of them? What to do with children? How and to whom to register them?
How to register property? There are all sorts of schools, kindergartens, clinics, antenatal clinics...
The state at this stage is not ready to somehow legalize all this, and indeed there are too many questions about what and how to approach everything this with animal seriousness.
Although humanity has a similar experience - this is polygamy in certain states. But do these families with two or more wives all live under one roof? That is the question.
Because I heard that we have a similar experience in the Caucasus, but in this case the man lives in two houses. And wives may not see each other for a long time. Know about each other, but not see each other and not intersect in any way.
And in our case, we are talking about living together and just such a friendly family in which there is a man and two women. Or two men and one woman. Why not? I think this is also a completely healthy and normal option when two men and a woman can coexist very amicably, and all three of them can really like it all.
But among the bourgeoisie, all hipsterism gravitates towards a tolerant attitude towards gays and other sexual deviations . But in our country, I think all this tolerance can go exactly along the path of what you called polyamorous relationships.
That is, the bourgeoisie are trying to somehow legitimize these gay marriages of theirs and in general all these deviant things . In our country, I think the legalization of polyamorous relationships may receive impetus. Especially where two women and a man are a unit of society and a full-fledged family. In general, I think that such an alliance should be stronger. But of course, provided that all three love each other and no one is driven by the fact that someone is overworked, and someone is in a more privileged position. In general, I think that in such a family the degree of tension should be less. Because both women are good friends to each other. They share everything among themselves and there is less emotional burden on the man.
Someone might say that, on the contrary, two women will simply fuck this poor man. And he will eventually escape from both of them. But that’s not true. In fact, when a woman constantly fucks her husband, it’s simply because she doesn’t have a good girlfriend, and this particular guy of hers is not suitable for this role. And she is in permanent irritation and constant doubts about everything possible.
Well, in general, I personally like this idea. But I think that a completely different option is emerging here, not at all similar to the Muslim experience of polygamy. Here we are talking specifically about the equal treatment of all three than in the Muslim version of the same family. Everything there is built on the cult of the man. And it’s the man who cements this marriage with several wives. Here, in this European version, everything will be built precisely on the equal relations of all three to each other.
There is an opinion that they say you can fully love only one person. And that the other person in this union will lack attention and love. I think that this is all in the head of the one who will complain about it. He may also believe that he lacks love in an ordinary marriage. That he is not loved or loved not so much. I think it’s all just a matter of basic trust in each other. You just need to believe and trust each other.
In general, mutual love is a very subtle and delicate substance that is built on trust. And which cannot be violated. I personally generally believe that it is generally impossible to cheat on someone you love. Because it will destroy everything that exists at the moment. And if you want something there, you just need to go and ask your significant other about it.
Like here at work, one girl is harassing me. It literally gets into my pants. In principle, I’m not disgusted by her, and I admit, I get annoyed with her. And apparently she has it in for me too.
And what do you advise me to do?
And I think that this is what needs to be done. That is, tell your soulmate all this just like that. And do exactly as she says.
Another question is that this other half should not prohibit. She must either allow it or make some kind of compromise.
That is, if she loves her soul mate, then she simply has no choice. That is, I think that she should not refuse unequivocally.
She should either allow or come up with a compromise.
A compromise could be joint sex with this girl at work. Where, how and when all this is discussed.
If the girl does not agree, then she will have to switch to someone else.
And I think the man also has no choice - he must definitely tell his soul mate about everything. This is the same achieved trust. When they love you and trust you.
And you should not violate this achieved trust.
Well, if you nevertheless climbed on someone, believing that this will never be known to your half, then you are very mistaken. In the office everyone knows everything about each other. This girl will definitely tell her friends about everything. And one of them may turn out to be your ill-wisher. And she can call your wife and tell you everything. And your love with your soul mate will crack. Trust will be destroyed and relationships are possible too.
The same thing works for girls - someone at work is trying to seduce you and does this worry and excite you? Be sure to tell your significant other about this. And let her decide for herself what to do next.
After all, it’s all about you. If you don’t care about courtship and you don’t like the guy, then you just tell him about it. And he will switch to someone else after some time.
But if you still care about his advances, then I think that your soulmate also has no choice - he cannot forbid you - you are not his property. He didn’t buy you on the market. He can only offer a compromise.
And this is trust. That is, this trust is double-edged. That is, this is not only a requirement that they not fuck you up and do nothing behind your back. It is also the ability to make compromises if your significant other wants it. Which could have tried to deceive you, but did not do this, counting on your understanding and following the agreements on mutual trust in each other.