Alarm! Children danger!

[Serg_A]

Seryozha, I understood your attitude towards prisoners and mothers. But you didn’t express your attitude towards pedophiles..)
Are you embarrassed? Are you afraid? or what?
imagine, there are no prisoners, mothers.. but only pedophiles and their victims.. how do you feel about pedophiles?)

I I read about them in scientific literature, even before you were born. But with my own eyes, I have not seen a single pedophile. I don’t care about them at all. How does a biologist treat spiders as a subject for study? Examine, study, dissect, describe... If I had seen one of them in person, then I would have developed an attitude towards them.

While you were arguing with him, he posted a pedo story, maybe two, I didn’t read the second one, in another topic. TS was delighted. So much for the pedobrests. They are pedophiles.

Well, I had no doubt that there was not a drop of sincerity in their posts. And they don’t care about children, by and large.

[rasaroam]

Circus, blah blah blah ..

why is it that they are all so upset...
whom they just didn’t remember... homophobes, necrophiles, prisoners, mothers, inquisitors, rich members, abortions, religion. .

cowards and demagogues.

not one said simply; yes, I am a pedophile!
hundreds of words about nothing..

Pedophiles are those who catch real first-graders in the gateways.
There is nothing pedophilic about enjoying looking at beautiful children’s photos (NOT PORN!).

Sent after 4 minutes 12 seconds:

There was such a film.

there was such a writer, Nabokov.
even good.. I liked his poems..
wrote another book, the confession of a pedophile..
and there is nothing in that book except pedophilia..
n and the whole "civilized" world was rushing around with him.. and we, too, as we discovered in the 90s.. "masterrrrr!!!"

why am I talking about this. learn to call a spade a spade. look at the articles of the Criminal Code. If you want to check the effect of the law, take a screenshot and contact the prosecutor. I assure you, you will read the forum from under an anonymizer, at best.
and stop these excuses "he’s pretending", "he’s half a lump". These are overtone windows. today fantasy - tomorrow a crippled child’s fate.

Yeah, yeah
"Today he plays jazz, and tomorrow he will sell his homeland" (c)
We know, we went through this nonsense.

PS. And "Lolita" is truly a masterpiece of world literature. Who doesn’t understand, stop reading Dontsova’s crafts!

Sent after 5 minutes 10 seconds:

any photos of children are prohibited. Moreover, posting photos of children without parental consent is illegal.
and now attention to the question
why do we need photographs of children on porn forum?

I already answered in another topic, but I’ll repeat here:

1) if parents post photos children on social networks - this is tantamount to consent to their reposting and publication (unless the opposite is written in large print on the page on the social network).
2) relying on "laws" is nonsense. Laws can be made such that you don’t know whether to laugh or cry. For example, in some US states, oral sex
3) any photos on a sex forum are posted to give pleasure to other people and to receive it themselves. What’s wrong with having fun through photography? (Note: not a real person, but a photographic image, and fully dressed!)

1.not equivalent.and there have long been precedents.
na social network is not the same as a porn forum. This is important!
2.however, you live in a legal state and not in the Tumba Yumba tribe
and even on this forum you obey the rules.
3.and I I’ll explain to you what’s wrong. This is a photograph of a child. A real child. And as long as there are consumers of such content, there will be producers who molest, sodomize and rape real children.
The very fascination with children is already an unhealthy crap that needs to be treated and not stuck out. so for reference and if you don’t mention the illegality of this whole bacchanalia

Nonsense.
There is no logical connection between looking at non-pornographic photographs of children posted in the open access, and there is not and cannot be violence and corruption.

[triangle]

This, excuse the rudeness, the talk of shit about pedophiles suffers from a lack of understanding of three things:
Firstly, as all criminologists will tell you, what is called sexual crimes has only a very indirect relation to sexuality; in fact, these are crimes violent, and it is not sexuality that needs to be fought, aimed at vulnerable groups of the population (in particular , on children), but with violence towards them. Unfortunately, there is a point of view, characteristic, oddly enough, of both patriarchal conservatism and radical feminism, that any sex always includes some degree of violence. I really hope that at least in this forum this point of view will not prevail.
Secondly, the campaign against pedophiles is disproportionately inflated at the state and public level in some countries (such as Russia, the USA or Australia). is not so much a desire to truly protect children, but a special case of a typical and long-known political trick of conservatives in all countries of the world - justifying various kinds of restrictions and prohibitions (legislative or moral) by "protecting children from dangerous influences." Think about it: why is it that in traditionally liberal countries that do not conduct such massive campaigns, mass child abuse does NOT flourish?
Thirdly, if you look at the history of laws on the age of sexual consent in different countries of the world, you can understand that this age is nothing more than a convention, even if we discard all Muslim countries. Perhaps not everyone here understands this, but there are people in the world who, at the age of 12, are sufficiently developed physically, intellectually and emotionally to enter into sexual life, and there are also people who do not have such development even at 30 years old. In such a situation, you can understand the use of some kind of "maturity test", but to tar everyone with the same brush based on age - I beg you. For every teenager whom this age restriction protected from harm, there is another teenager whose life was ruined by this restriction or brought significant discomfort.

[Epidemic]

The presence and images of children on an adult porn resource is unacceptable and incredibly annoying. I use the report button if I come across such messages. I support bans, this is a common practice, there are no crusades. This should be dealt with by the administration and the owner of the resource. I kept the topic in the admin area, it seems adequate .

[Ahah]

Damn moralists.
On this forum EVERYONE falls under different articles of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.
Took two dicks in my mouth, took three dicks in different holes, sucked off a friend, fucked myself in the ass, fucked you and my wife, slept with my dad in my 20s, watched how they fuck in a bathhouse, etc. etc.
Even for discussing in the public domain, YOU/US ALL should be hanged under the article for distributing these materials.
The RF law in no way applies to those same gypsies - in In RUSSIA they (sell/buy) their children = they give them away in marriage from the age of 12.
And here you are yelling about pedophilia, CLOSING your eyes to the well-known FACTS.
Well, everyone rushed to make allegations against the gypsies - weak? India - from 12 years old, in many countries - from 14 years old. Girls in the Russian Federation masturbate from 8, fuck themselves with all sorts of sticks and pencils from 10-12, suck boys from 10, drunkenly give themselves away from 14, get into their dad’s panties from 12-14. Some members of the forum here write about it themselves.
Damn this is life... which is around us, and putting a wall in front of yourself and not seeing it is like that don’t read, unsubscribe, go to forums about LOVE in the style of PETRARCCA about platonic love at a distance with marshmallow poems about the stars.

[rasaroam]

The presence and images of children on an adult porn resource is unacceptable and incredibly annoying. I use the complaint button if I come across such messages. I support bans, this is a common practice, there are no crusades. This should be dealt with by the administration and the owner of the resource. The topic was kept in the admin section, it seems adequate.

If images of children are not naked, but in clothes, then they can be posted on ANY resources.

[Epidemic]

Rasrom, I don’t agree with you. Forum 18+, by registering on it you agree and accept the terms of the resource. The forum header describes what is prohibited, including children’s photos.
The rest is all lyrics and demagoguery. I will not fight with you, do not argue. In case If I see a violation, I will complain. The rest is up to the administration and moderation.

[Tenos]

Quiet complaints will not help reduce the degree of lovers of young children. One topic will be deleted and two others will appear. As I understand it, this is how it happened here
public censure and bans. the law of the crowd

When I came here in the fall there was mostly just trash. When I wrote the first comment, someone wrote something like, well, thank God an adequate person appeared on the forum, and when I posted the first topic, they wrote that finally normal topics had appeared here. Since then, the forum has changed.
I am against child porn, but we need to fight it through deletion. And, people will decide for themselves which topics they feel more comfortable with and which ones to ignore.
I’m just afraid that if you support the topics of indignation, then the topics of those who still don’t like something will follow. Ah, there are those here who don’t like everything. This will not end well.

you cannot compare anything else and pedophilia. This is an incorrect comparison a priori.
there should not be pedophilic topics in the first place, this is against the law state and universal
everything else can be argued, you can give arguments and you need to at least somehow justify it
to have a ban for spam and send a message to fuck, but not to have one for posting child porn is nonsense.
simple complaints here You can’t get by
by removing bans and shaming. This is how to fight more effectively

I’m wondering why pedophile deputies aren’t in prison? There are quite a few of them there. And cops can also be pedophiles. I know a case where a 6 year old boy was raped and a pedophile nurse was quickly caught. They sentenced him to prison, he didn’t stay there for long, and they hanged him. A couple of years later, the cop who was in charge of this case was caught red-handed with an 8-year-old girl. So he doesn’t even sit there, he went to another area. The nurse was not the culprit, this cop set him up

[attentive1]

What specific children’s photos are we talking about on the forum? Show examples. Pornography, both adult and children, is interpreted as an explicit depiction of genitals. Is that true or not?

[Ogest]

What specific children’s photos are we talking about on the forum? Show examples. Pornography, both adult and children, is interpreted as an explicit depiction of genitals. Is this true or not?

There was a thread on the forum with photographs of oral sex. Much to the dismay of local pedophiles, it was removed.

[rasaroam]

What specific children’s photos are we talking about on the forum? Show examples. Pornography, both adult and children, is interpreted as an explicit depiction of genitals. Is this true or not?

So the fact is that these zanji squeal not only about pornographic photos of children (which, if they appear here, are immediately deleted), but they want to ban ANY photographs of children. Even girls in winter coats

[Ogest]

Even girls in winter coats

Why do you need such pictures on a forum about sex?

[rasaroam]

Even girls in winter coats

Why do you need such pictures on a forum about sex?

Sex is about arousal.
And for many, beautiful faces (even if the girl is wearing a fur coat) are more exciting than naked pussies and asses, but without faces.

[Ogest]

Sex is about arousal.
And many people are more excited by beautiful faces (even if the girl is wearing a fur coat) than by naked pussies and butts, but without faces.

So what are you doing with these photos?

[Lisa24]

When I came here in the fall there was mostly just trash. When I wrote the first comment, someone wrote something like, well, thank God an adequate person appeared on the forum, and when I posted the first topic, they wrote that finally normal topics had appeared here. Since then, the forum has changed.
I am against child porn, but we need to fight it through deletion. And, people will decide for themselves which topics they feel more comfortable with and which ones to ignore.
I’m just afraid that if you support the topics of indignation, then the topics of those who still don’t like something will follow. Ah, there are those here who don’t like everything. This will not end well.

you cannot compare anything else and pedophilia. This is an incorrect comparison a priori.
there should not be pedophilic topics in the first place, this is against the law state and universal
everything else can be argued, you can give arguments and you need to at least somehow justify it
to have a ban for spam and send a message to fuck, but not to have one for posting child porn is nonsense.
simple complaints here You can’t get by
by removing bans and shaming. This is how to fight more effectively

I’m wondering why pedophile deputies aren’t in prison? There are quite a few of them there. And cops can also be pedophiles. I know a case where a 6 year old boy was raped and a pedophile nurse was quickly caught. They sentenced him to prison, he didn’t stay there for long, and they hanged him. A couple of years later, the cop who was in charge of this case was caught red-handed with an 8-year-old girl. So he doesn’t even sit there, he went to another area. The nurse was not the culprit, this cop set him up

I’m also interested. And I even have thoughts about this. Because everything happens with tacit consent and connivance. I didn’t pass by my business is not all so simple.
but this is not about that at all. there is no need to talk about completely simple, understandable things. there should be no photographs of children in the background, there should be no links to child porn. such posting will result in a ban .as for spam if you want. and I deliberately did not touch upon the topic of fantasies and instructions on how to seduce a child because I knew that a river of ranting would flow)

[rasaroam]

you can’t compare something else and pedophilia. This is an incorrect comparison a priori.
there shouldn’t be pedophilic topics in the first place, it’s against the state and universal law
everything else can be argued give reasons and need to at least somehow justify it
having a ban for spam and sending a fuck off message, but not having one for posting child porn is nonsense.
simple complaints will not get by here
through removing the ban and shaming .this is how to fight more effectively

I wonder why pedophile deputies are not in prison? There are quite a few of them there. And cops can also be pedophiles. I know a case where a 6 year old boy was raped and a pedophile nurse was quickly caught. They sentenced him to prison, he didn’t stay there for long, and they hanged him. A couple of years later, the cop who was in charge of this case was caught red-handed with an 8-year-old girl. So he doesn’t even sit there, he went to another area. The nurse was not the culprit, this cop set him up

I’m also interested. And I even have thoughts about this. Because everything happens with tacit consent and connivance. I didn’t pass by my business is not all so simple.
but this is not about that at all. there is no need to talk about completely simple, understandable things. there should be no photographs of children in the background, there should be no links to child porn. such posting will result in a ban .as for spam if you want. and I deliberately did not touch upon the topic of fantasies and instructions on how to seduce a child because I knew that a river of ranting would flow)

And there should be no drawings depicting children either ?

[Lisa24]

Shouldn’t there be drawings depicting children either?

in a fur coat?
sculpt

[etc]

If images of children are not naked, but in clothes, then they can be posted ON ANY resources.

Only with the consent of their parents!!!

[rasaroam]

Shouldn’t there be drawings depicting children either?

in a fur coat?
sculpt

No, without a fur coat. And without everything else too

Sent after 2 minutes 5 seconds:

If images of children are not naked, but in clothes, then they can be posted on ANY resources.

Only with the consent of their parents!!!

Nonsense.
These photos are freely available on websites selling children’s clothing, for example. And nowhere is it stipulated that their reposting on any resources is not permitted.
The same applies to photos that parents voluntarily post on their social networks for public viewing.

[Lisa24]

Shouldn’t there be drawings depicting children either?

in a fur coat?
sculpt

No, without a fur coat. And without everything else too

no it is impossible. children’s drawings without everything else are also treated as dp. and their publication as distribution is also

[rasaroam]

in a fur coat?
sculpt

No, without a fur coat. And without everything else too

no it is impossible. children’s drawings without everything else are also interpreted as dp. and their publication as distribution is also

That is . DRAWINGS (not photos of real people, but drawn fictional characters!!!!) cannot be distributed??!!
And this is not nonsense???!!!!

[attentive1]

Hypocrites, full of magic. Do you ever go to the southern beaches? Have you seen preschool children without panties there? And no one grabbed the parents to hand them over to the police.

[Lisa24]

These photos are freely available on sites selling children’s clothing

the fashion house and the site received such permission. But you did not. By replicating and distributing images of the child without consent you are violating his rights and his guardians. It’s simple

[rasaroam]

These photos are freely available on sites selling children’s clothing

the fashion house and the site received such permission. But you did not. by replicating and distributing depicting a child without the consent of him and his guardians, you are violating his rights. It’s simple

And I (like everyone else) AND SHOULD NOT receive such consent, if this is not specified on this resource.
Free access - by definition implies the right of anyone to link and repost.

ZY. More precisely, this kind of consent is given BY THE FACT OF posting photos in the public domain.
If you don’t want to give consent, don’t post it.

[Circus]

It is necessary to remove all sections related to sex, leave only Culture, cinema and books, but you can leave one topic about the sandwich position. On the forum you tell and discuss who is with whom and when, and you haven’t thought about how many children read the forum, huh? Here, after all, they don’t ask for a passport to confirm your age, and in principle you can read it even without registration. Have you ever thought that your stories and discussions are corrupting them?

[etc]

As explained by the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation, by virtue of Art. 64 of the Family Code of the Russian Federation and Art. 28 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, parents, being the legal representatives of their children (minors under 14 years of age (minors), act in defense of their rights and interests, and only they have the right to make transactions on their behalf.
Article 3 of the Federal Law of July 27, 2006 No. 152-FZ “On Personal Data” establishes that personal data is any information relating to a directly or indirectly identified or identifiable individual (personal data subject) means any action (operation). ) or a set of actions (operations), including collection, recording, accumulation, storage, distribution, provision, access to them. In addition, Article 11 provides that information that characterizes the physiological and biological characteristics of a person, on the basis of which his identity can be established. (biometric personal data) can be processed only with written consent of the subject of personal data.

Taking into account the foregoing, we can conclude that disclosure and use of an image (photograph) of a minor can only be carried out with the consent of his parents or other legal representatives (adoptive parents or guardians).

Sent after 8 minutes 52 seconds:

Nonsense.

Not knowing the law does not exempt you from liability.

“How to use children’s photographs legally”?

Image of any person is protected by law (Art. 152.1 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation). It cannot be used uncontrollably at your own discretion. Photos of children are prohibited from being published without the consent of their parents. This consent can be written or in the form of so-called implied actions - for example, if posting an image on some site or forum automatically means consent.

A photo of your child cannot be taken without permission to illustrate an article, even if it is posted on social networks, on free stock sites and is in the public domain.
And you also cannot take photographs of other people’s children if the parents have not given consent. Even if the photo has already been posted in many sources, this does not give the right to free use.

But there are exceptions.

When a photo can be used without permission

State or public interest. For example, if a child is lost.
The photo was taken in a public place, at a public event and at In this case, the child is not the main object. For example, if this is a report from a competition or concert, there are a lot of people in the photo and this is a long shot.
The image is unrecognizable. For example, the child’s face is completely covered or blurred.
The man posed for a fee. As long as copyrights are not violated. For example, a child starred in an advertisement or for a stock photo with the consent of the parents.

Is it possible to take children’s photographs from the websites of kindergartens and schools

No, without permission this cannot be done. Kindergartens and schools are not places of free attendance. Parents could consent to the posting of photographs specifically for the school website. But this does not mean that the image can be posted in other places without their permission.

The photographer who photographed the matinee, and even the press service of the media, do not have the right to take photographs to illustrate their materials. This is possible only with the consent of the parents.

If a photograph of a child was used without consent

By law, you can demand the removal of the image, as well as compensation for moral damages.
The person who took the photo without permission must prove the parents’ consent to the use of the child’s image .

There is one more exception in Article 152.1. Civil Code of the Russian Federation - you can publish photos without permission if there is public, public or state interest. In this case, it does not matter whether the child is the main subject of photography or not. For example, winning a competition as an event is of public interest. This means that this case is eligible for a lawsuit. clause 1.

[Lisa24]

And I (like everyone else) SHOULD NOT be

obliged by law))

[rasaroam]

As explained by the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation, by virtue of Art. 64 of the Family Code of the Russian Federation and Art. 28 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, parents, being the legal representatives of their children (minors under 14 years of age (minors), act in defense of their rights and interests, and only they have the right to make transactions on their behalf.
Article 3 of the Federal Law of July 27, 2006 No. 152-FZ “On Personal Data” establishes that personal data is any information relating to a directly or indirectly identified or identifiable individual (personal data subject) means any action (operation). ) or a set of actions (operations), including collection, recording, accumulation, storage, distribution, provision, access to them. In addition, Article 11 provides that information that characterizes the physiological and biological characteristics of a person, on the basis of which his identity can be established. (biometric personal data) can be processed only with written consent of the subject of personal data.

Taking into account the foregoing, we can conclude that disclosure and use of an image (photograph) of a minor can only be carried out with the consent of his parents or other legal representatives (adoptive parents or guardians).

Sent after 8 minutes 52 seconds:

Nonsense.

Not knowing the law does not exempt you from liability.

“How to use children’s photographs legally”?

Image of any person is protected by law (Art. 152.1 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation). It cannot be used uncontrollably at your own discretion. Photos of children are prohibited from being published without the consent of their parents. This consent can be written or in the form of so-called implied actions - for example, if posting an image on some site or forum automatically means consent.

A photo of your child cannot be taken without permission to illustrate an article, even if it is posted on social networks, on free stock sites and is in the public domain.
And you also cannot take photographs of other people’s children if the parents have not given consent. Even if the photo has already been posted in many sources, this does not give the right to free use.

But there are exceptions.

When a photo can be used without permission

State or public interest. For example, if a child is lost.
The photo was taken in a public place, at a public event and at In this case, the child is not the main object. For example, if this is a report from a competition or concert, there are a lot of people in the photo and this is a long shot.
The image is unrecognizable. For example, the child’s face is completely covered or blurred.
The man posed for a fee. As long as copyrights are not violated. For example, a child starred in an advertisement or for a stock photo with the consent of the parents.

Is it possible to take children’s photographs from the websites of kindergartens and schools

No, without permission this cannot be done. Kindergartens and schools are not places of free attendance. Parents could consent to the posting of photographs specifically for the school website. But this does not mean that the image can be posted in other places without their permission.

The photographer who photographed the matinee, and even the press service of the media, do not have the right to take photographs to illustrate their materials. This is possible only with the consent of the parents.

If a photograph of a child was used without consent

By law, you can demand the removal of the image, as well as compensation for moral damages.
The person who took the photo without permission must prove the parents’ consent to the use of the child’s image .

There is one more exception in Article 152.1. Civil Code of the Russian Federation - you can publish photos without permission if there is public, public or state interest. In this case, it does not matter whether the child is the main subject of photography or not. For example, winning a competition as an event is of public interest. This means that this case is eligible for a lawsuit. p.1 .

Nonsense.
Free access is free.
You can try to regulate this a thousand times sphere, but there will be zero sense.

Either ban forever any images of children anywhere - or admit the reality, which is that "the fight of morons with the Internet" ( c) morons will always lose.

[etc]

Nonsense.
Free access is free.
You can try to regulate this area a thousand times, but there will be no point.

Or ban forever any images of children anywhere - or accept the reality that "the fight of morons with the Internet" (c) morons will always lose

That is, at first you argued that these photos are freely available and can be used.
Now that it is useless to fight the Internet and we (who are against pedophilia) are all morons and will lose anyway.
I was already wondering, how old are you? Do you like to jerk off to children? Do you dream about sexual intercourse with a child?

[Pierro]

There is nothing pedophilic about getting pleasure from looking at beautiful children’s photos (NOT PORN!).

Do you get pleasure from innocently looking at children’s photos?
a weak angel on a pervert site?)

[rasaroam]

Nonsense.
Free access is free.
You can try to regulate this area a thousand times, but there will be no point.

Either ban forever any images of children anywhere - or admit the reality that "the fight of morons with the Internet" (c) morons will always lose

That is, at first you argued that these photos are freely available and can be used.
Now that it is useless to fight the Internet and we (who are against pedophilia) are all morons and will lose anyway .
I was already wondering, how old are you? Do you like to jerk off to children? Do you dream of sexual intimacy with a child?

1) the photos are freely available and you can use them
2) those who want this free limiting access is morons and, of course, they will lose.
3) http://risovach.ru/upload/2014/12/mem/p ... _orig_.png

[attentive1]

To check Banned or not? Complain to the whole world
https://i.postimg.cc/j5X8BgTh/20230717-145801.jpg

[etc]

1) the photos are freely available and you can use them
2) those who want to limit this free access are morons and, of course, will lose.

Spells didn’t really help the sectarians...

[Tenos]

First you need to educate your parents, and then your children. Nowadays they dress children like whores, if you say something to them, I’m almost getting into a fight with motherfuckers, saying whatever I want, I’ll dress my daughter even though she’ll be naked, it’s none of your business, she’s my child, I’ll do whatever I want

[Lisa24]

To check Are they banned or not? Complain to the whole world

ospd the whole speech about bans that no one knows about and here is such a daredevil! bravo!
my delight

Sent after 1 minute 44 seconds:

First you need to educate your parents, and then your children. Nowadays they dress children like whores, if you tell them comments like this, the motherfuckers almost get into a fight saying whatever I want, I’ll dress my daughter even though she’ll be naked, it’s none of your business, she’s my child and I’ll do whatever I want

exactly! But until this happens, we will seduce the kids so that these mothers will know how it happens!
only with bitter experience will an understanding of this come

[rasaroam]

Until this happens, we will seduce the kids

Not kids, but PHOTOS of kids I’ll go and seduce the photo, I wonder if the photo will scream "No, no, don’t"?

[etc]

To check: Banned or not? Complain to the whole world

Someone will knock on Roskomnadzor, but they won’t look into it, they will close the site.

[Lisa24]

Not babies, but PHOTOS of babies

oh don’t be modest
this is for now))

[rasaroam]

Not babies, but PHOTOS of babies

oh don’t be modest
this is for now ))

Well, I said above: "Today he plays jazz, and tomorrow he will sell his homeland" (c)

[Lisa24]

Well, I said above: "Today he plays jazz, and tomorrow he will sell his homeland.

I don’t know and I don’t want to know what’s in your pedobosses happens

[rasaroam]

Well, I said above: "Today he plays jazz, and tomorrow he will sell his homeland

I don’t know and I don’t want to know what’s going on in your little fagots

That’s it: non-striving for knowledge is evil

[Topchik]

So where are the links?
It’s not interesting without links.
We need to look, judge and then look again.
Bastards are pedophiles.
Fuck girls in the ass.
They lick their pussies.

[Circus]

I don’t know and I don’t want to know what’s going on in your motherfuckers

I repeat once again, the entire forum, every participant is under article 134. Here you write your stories and much more, and minors read it and bring it to life.

[Serg_A]

Pierro, perhaps we know each other (if you are here under other nicknames you are present) at least I got the impression that you know me. Lisa24, I’m disappointed.

[Pierro]

Serg_A, no, I don’t know anyone here. these “rays of goodness” come from me, people feel them.. and reach out..)

[Familisex]

look at the modern West. Are you satisfied with this "culture"?

made me laugh. Regarding the west. You can go to any Russian outback and look at the local culture. Where from the age of 10-11 children drink, sleep drunk with just anyone, where prison “romance” flourishes wildly, where children have no rights, literally at all! And they can be fucked by fathers, uncles, neighbors, or beaten by teachers at school, calling it education. Because children are afraid to declare something like that, because they are not considered people, but because "You little snot, what are you allowing yourself to do?!"
And instead of fighting windmills in such forums (where probably 90 percent of them are youngsters with wild imaginations) it’s better to curse orphanages or low-income families and achieve children’s rights and help them. Otherwise, anyone can go on the Internet pretending to be a righteous person. And to do a real thing where you really have to get off your ass and strain yourself... Now this is a different story.

Sent after 14 minutes 18 seconds:
Well, I’ll add on my own behalf, so to speak, summing up all the above-mentioned saliva - 1) I haven’t seen any real photos or links to pornography involving children here .
2) photos of some children from the Internet, this is simply photos of some children from the Internet that are in the public domain (even if some mother remembered this photo on her social networks) and what is there already who is adding to these photos in their imagination, this is already a problem for those who draw.
3) the fact that people tell their stories is essentially like therapy (if you think they are sick, justify it) And if you just stop talking about it, it will not change the fact that it is happening.
4) pseudo defenders and people of high morals and moral values, why did you end up on the “forum about sex and sexual deviations?” it clearly says that it is about sexual deviations, but you stayed here. This is the same as if you went into a pub and were indignant that everyone there drinks beer but at the same time you would go there regularly and sat all evening.
Well, in conclusion, I want to quote some great thinker - everyone jerks off as he wants!

[Bro]

Lisa24, and the rest who joined....well , did you fight pedophiles normally??
They sat quietly in their corners, and now the first page of active topics in only pedo or near-pedo topics

[niqk]

Familisex, well, of course, Russia sucks! But the West is a shining city on a hill, where exclusively angelic beings hang out, setting an example for the whole World! And the Outskirts are Europe, where there is freedom - even with your ass
eat! To the point of vomit!!!

[Serg_A]

Familisex, well, of course, Russia - it sucks! But the West is a shining city on a hill, where exclusively angelic beings hang out, setting an example for the whole World! And the Outskirts are Europe, where there is freedom - even with your ass
eat! To the point of vomit!!!

He’s from Kyiv, what does Ukraine have to do with it?! You also call Moscow Russia

[niqk]

Well, of course, Kyiv has nothing to do with Ukraine...