Serious relationships and marriage

[The passage]

Yesterday I posted a topic about what men like in women and what they don’t like. It’s very nice that many men responded. It was very interesting to read the answers.
They wrote several times that the topic was too big, and also that men like different girls for sex and for relationships. For sex, I have a rough idea of ​​what they need and I also read about preferences.
Oh, my question is this. Men, what woman would you never marry? By not married, I mean an officially registered relationship, and not life in a civil marriage.

[Alex366]

Who fucks other men.

[The passage]

Who fucks other men.

Do you need a virgin for your wife?

[Alex366]

I mean in relationships.

[BackAgain]

Marinka, if at least one of the basic points is missing:
Reciprocity
Love
Passion
Common worldview
Common basic life values
Loyalty

[Gudgeon]

In addition to what I already wrote earlier (lack of independence, immaturity, reluctance to achieve something, etc.) there is one more quality in some women that will kill any dignity. This is constant petty and not very dissatisfaction.
"Forever dissatisfied" is the worst nightmare. From household: you cleaned it up incorrectly, put it in the wrong place, bought few products, the sour cream in the jar is the wrong color, you breathe loudly, you smell of gasoline again, you didn’t wash my car, you’re doing the repairs slowly, you prepared dinner that wasn’t tasty, you dried out the meat, you over-soaked the water, oil over-oiled, etc. and so on. Before presenting "for life" like: you earn little, you don’t give enough gifts, you work too much, you come home late, you don’t spend enough time with me (and it’s easy to do all this at the same time), you’ve become bald/fat/lose weight/aged, we don’t go anywhere, nothing I don’t see you, you ignore my relatives, you read little, you don’t exercise, etc. and so on. As if a person has 48 hours in a day...
In general, whenever you come, and whatever you are with, there is always something to latch on to.
I avoid these women. Listening to all this for a short time is annoying, but being married all your life... Yes, this is a torture chamber. And I also have such a character... I slowly boil, but I can bark... if they take me out there will be a scolding!
I have always lived with the position: if I am so unhappy, I don’t hold anyone by force, the door is there.
And when you find a woman without this drawback, you hold on to her with both hands! Especially if you had experience...
And the most interesting thing is that the “eternally dissatisfied” never leave on their own, even if you show them the door. Those. everything is wrong and everything is wrong, but I’ll stay here I had to kick people like that out of my life. I hope mine never turns into this. Of course, all women have a certain amount of this “not so”, not without it. The main thing is that this should not be a daily habit and the norm of life.

[Rtrc]

Do you need a virgin for a wife?

It depends on age. If the MCH is a little over 20, then, of course, he needs exactly this.
After 30 and beyond, everything is exactly the opposite.
I definitely wouldn’t marry a lazy one.

[fin]

I would never marry a smoker!

[Fernando]

Well, for example, I wouldn’t get married if:
If I didn’t love her
If she slept with everyone
If she was very disgusting in appearance
I think like criteria can be listed until the evening and you won’t list everything
It’s much easier to answer the question "which one would you marry"
There will be less to list and there will be no doubts)

[The passage]

Well, for example, I wouldn’t get married if:
If I didn’t love her
If she slept with everyone
If she was very disgusting in appearance
I think such criteria can be listed until the evening, and then you won’t list everything
It is much easier to answer the question "which one would you marry"
There will be less to list and there will be no doubts)

At the same time answer the question: who would you marry?)

[niqk]

I married out of mutual love. Otherwise, it’s just stupid to think about it...

[Fernando]

Marinka,
So I’m already married
A beautiful, slender, skillful housewife who does not go out on holiday.
We have complete mutual understanding and ideal relationships, both domestic and sexual.
These are the ones you should marry - those who complement the guy with whom the couple becomes one
It may sound stupid and banal - but this is purely my opinion)

[Beautiful]

Marinka, I would not marry a woman with a very harmful character who likes to do dirty tricks. On someone who doesn’t like sex, who is greedy for money, who is fat, who is unkempt, who is ugly in appearance, who is a bad housewife.

[Mr.hamsterrr]

I would never marry a woman who doesn’t love me.
If she has an alcohol addiction (drugs too)
If she doesn’t attract me sexually.
Well, of course, if she doesn’t like sex or it’s enough for her not to have it very often))

[Slavaregy]

I definitely wouldn’t marry someone who doesn’t accept me as I am and with all my shortcomings and dignity. There is no time to change, and neither is the desire.

[Wool]

I would not have married Marinke I would have eaten my passport in front of the registry office

[niqk]

I would not have married Marinke I would have eaten my passport in front of the registry office

I probably would have choked! And this would amuse everyone!!!

[Aion2012Dead]

I would marry a girl who has had a positive experience of incest and who is not averse to diluting it with bestiality.
And so that she would raise our children in the same spirit.

[Sweden125]

Yesterday I posted a topic about what men like in women and what they don’t like. It’s very nice that many men responded. It was very interesting to read the answers.
They wrote several times that the topic was too big, and also that men like different girls for sex and for relationships. For sex, I have a rough idea of ​​what they need and I’ve also read about preferences.
Oh, my question is this. Men, what woman would you never marry? By not married, I mean an officially registered relationship, and not life in a civil marriage.

there are different topics and statements here! Some people love one thing, others another! I’ve been with my husband for 18 years now and I love girls!

[Let’s]

In general, the question is not clear-cut. Everyone writes: I wouldn’t marry such or such. Taking into account the fact that I was married for the second time and had different relationships outside of marriage. Yes, when you don’t love a person and you’re not attracted to him, you can say that you wouldn’t marry this, that, or the other. But there is such a thing as love. And if you fall in love, you don’t notice the flaws. Love hides flaws, not love reveals them. You forgive hysteria and quirks and deception... You justify her/him for yourself... And then the feelings or passion pass. And you’re already thinking. Why didn’t I see it right away... And then, even a person’s virtues begin to infuriate him.
Even though I’m already married, I’ll say that after my first marriage, I would never marry a woman who puts her opinion above the rest. Or rather, not higher, but it is the only correct one. The rest are not considered. It should be as I decided. No options. The result was that they separated, but they still lived for 10 years.

[The passage]

I would never marry a woman who puts her opinion above others. Or rather, not higher, but it is the only correct one. The rest are not considered. It should be as I decided. No options. Bottom line, they separated, but they lived for 10 years after all.

It turns out that you were happy with this for 10 years? What happened ten years later? What was the trigger?

[Let’s]

I would never marry a woman who puts her opinion above others. Or rather, not higher, but it is the only correct one. The rest are not considered. It should be as I decided. No options. Bottom line, they separated, but they lived for 10 years after all.

It turns out that you were happy with this for 10 years? What happened ten years later? What was the trigger?

a little wrong))) first - it did not appear from the first day, or rather not in this form. The second point is love. You try to please the woman you love.. Well, she doesn’t want to go to this resort, but to this one, well, okay, if she wants.. She doesn’t want this way, but that way, well, okay, the woman she loves needs to be pampered.. let’s do it that way. And this suited me for about 5 years... Until her opinion began to affect my friends and my work. Literally, your friends are idiots, you don’t need to communicate with them. Here at my work... your job is not the same. We need to change it. . Scandals began on her part. For another three years I tried to rectify the situation, save the marriage.. Children after all.. I changed jobs, but still not the same.. As a result, after being married for 8 years together, I simply stopped trying to save the relationship and a mistress appeared.. And after another year and a half we separated.. When she asked directly whether I had another, I directly and honestly said yes.. And we quietly and peacefully separated. Then I tried to communicate in a good way, children after all. Came to visit the children. But he was always to blame for the breakdown of the family. Until, again, I got tired of listening to this every time. And now we don’t even communicate.. Absolutely. I communicate with my children, I meet with them, but I don’t and don’t want to with my ex-wife..
Here’s the story. Brief, without any nuances.

[◊_NeBo[_Na_]LaDoNi_◊]

I would never marry a woman who puts her opinion above others. Or rather, not higher, but it is the only correct one. The rest are not considered. It should be as I decided. No options. Bottom line, they separated, but they lived for 10 years after all.

It turns out that you were happy with this for 10 years? What happened ten years later? What was the trigger?

a little wrong))) first - it did not appear from the first day, or rather not in this form. The second point is love. You try to please the woman you love.. Well, she doesn’t want to go to this resort, but to this one, well, okay, if she wants.. She doesn’t want this way, but that way, well, okay, the woman she loves needs to be pampered.. let’s do it that way. And this suited me for about 5 years... Until her opinion began to affect my friends and my work. Literally, your friends are idiots, you don’t need to communicate with them. Here at my work... your job is not the same. We need to change it. . Scandals began on her part. For another three years I tried to rectify the situation, save the marriage.. Children after all.. I changed jobs, but still not the same.. As a result, after being married for 8 years together, I simply stopped trying to save the relationship and a mistress appeared.. And after another year and a half we separated.. When she asked directly whether I had another, I directly and honestly said yes.. And we quietly and peacefully separated. Then I tried to communicate in a good way, children after all. Came to visit the children. But he was always to blame for the breakdown of the family. Until, again, I got tired of listening to this every time. And now we don’t even communicate.. Absolutely. I communicate with my children, I meet with them, but I don’t and don’t want to with my ex-wife..
Here’s the story. Brief, without any nuances.

if you help children financially, then you are handsome.

[The passage]

Here is the story. Brief, without any nuances.

Such a story tells us nothing. Not about your wife, not about you. Why did she use her work as an example? How did she explain this? What was her job? Why was your work bad in her opinion and why was her opinion wrong in yours? Who did you work for? You made good money, spent weekends with your family, but she wasn’t happy with it? Why didn’t she like your second job? What did you do in your second job? What was wrong with your friends? Have you completed intellectual quests and they scored few points? Give an example when you mentioned that they should. So that you can understand that you shouldn’t have them.
If you divorced so easily after your betrayal, then why didn’t you divorce before the betrayal? We will not take children as an argument. You didn’t leave your mistress, choosing a family, for the sake of the children, but you got divorced and the children somehow became not so important to save the family.
It’s just that for now we can conclude from your story that you lived and you are all satisfied. They even changed jobs, and then another one appeared and the marriage broke up because of your infidelity.
I’m not going to dig through my dirty laundry. You just somehow blame her, but for now we have that it was you who cheated on her for a year and a half, and not she on you.
If only her job turns out to be so-so, and your two are very good, and plus yours wonderful friends that she didn’t like. Then the scales will level out, at least a little in your favor.

[◊_NeBo[_Na_]LaDoNi_◊]

Here is the story. Brief, without any nuances.

I’m not going to delve into dirty laundry.

said Marinka and dived with her feet into the basket with dirty laundry not her own laundry, but someone else’s... finding out who shitted in which panties and why?..

[Keep the change for yourself]

Marinka, d3nan, but in my opinion everything is clear - the wife attacked her husband with her claims while the husband wanted to please and please her.
Classic.

[The passage]

Here’s the story. Brief, without any nuances.

I’m not going to delve into dirty laundry.

said Marinka and dived with her feet into the basket with dirty laundry not her own laundry, but someone else’s... finding out who shitted in which panties and why?..

Everything turned out very interesting for him. He cheated for a year and a half, and blamed his wife for the collapse of the family.

Sent after 6 minutes 23 seconds:

Marinka, d3nan, but in my opinion everything is clear - the wife attacked her husband with her claims while the husband wanted to please and please her.
Classic.

You draw conclusions too early. First, let him write what a good first job he had, what a better second job he had, and what wonderful friends he had. Ah, the villainous wife didn’t appreciate any of this.
When a person writes that he cheated for a year and a half because he didn’t want to get a divorce, it’s like sawing the branch you’re sitting on.

[◊_NeBo[_Na_]LaDoNi_◊]

I’m not going to go through my dirty laundry.

said Marinka and dived with her feet into the basket with dirty laundry not her own laundry, but someone else’s.. finding out who shitted in which panties and why?..

Everything turned out very interesting for him. He himself cheated for a year and a half, and blamed his wife for the collapse of the family.

this is his business, not yours. Are you going to judge him?.. don’t remember the biblical wisdom: “Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.” Somehow, I doubt that you have a halo over your head and I don’t see angel wings behind your back.

[The passage]

said Marinka and dived into the a basket with dirty laundry not your own laundry, but someone else’s... finding out who shitted in which panties and why?..

Everything turned out very interesting for him. He himself cheated for a year and a half, and blamed his wife for the collapse of the family.

this is his business, not yours. Are you going to judge him?.. don’t remember the biblical wisdom: “Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.” Somehow, I doubt that you have a halo over your head and I don’t see angel wings behind your back.

A person in my thread left a post about his wife and naturally I had questions. These questions are likely to turn things around. His story was not just an excuse for his vile act, but also an undeserved accusation of his wife. Cowardly people always do this. For himself, let him think as he wants, but there is no need to deceive us here.
If this is not so, then he will write about his work, about his friends, and we will understand that both are to blame for the collapse of the family.

[Let’s]

I’m not going to go through my dirty laundry.

said Marinka and dived with her feet into the basket with dirty laundry not her own laundry, but someone else’s.. finding out who shitted in which panties and why?..

Everything turned out very interesting for him. He cheated for a year and a half, but blamed his wife for the collapse of the family.

I didn’t blame my wife for the collapse)) where did you read that? I described the approximate course of events... Without going into details. And he honestly wrote that yes, I had a mistress about whom, at the very first conversation, I told it like it is. because at that moment saving the marriage no longer mattered to me. And yes, in the divorce itself I am the initiator. I do not relieve myself of responsibility, because family and marriage are a joint venture and not a one-sided game.

[The passage]

Marinka said and dived with her feet into a basket with dirty laundry not hers underwear, but someone else’s... finding out who shit in which panties and why?..

Everything turned out very interesting for him. He cheated for a year and a half, but blamed his wife for the collapse of the family.

I didn’t blame my wife for the collapse)) where did you read that? I described the approximate course of events... Without going into details. And he honestly wrote that yes, I had a mistress about whom, at the very first conversation, I told it like it is. because at that moment saving the marriage no longer mattered to me. And yes, in the divorce itself I am the initiator. I do not absolve myself of responsibility, because family and marriage are a joint venture and not a one-sided game.

Without answers to my questions, the situation is incomprehensible . There are few questions, answers to them will take one minute. Please answer

[◊_NeBo[_Na_]LaDoNi_◊]

Everything turned out very interesting for him. He himself cheated for a year and a half, and blamed his wife for the collapse of the family.

this is his business, not yours. Are you going to judge him?.. don’t remember the biblical wisdom: “Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.” Somehow, I doubt that you have a halo over your head and I don’t see angel wings behind your back.

A person in my thread left a post about his wife and naturally I had questions. These questions are likely to turn things around. His story was not just an excuse for his vile act, but also an undeserved accusation of his wife. Cowardly people always do this. For himself, let him think as he wants, but there is no need to deceive us here.
If this is not so, then he will write about his work, about his friends, and we will understand that both are to blame for the collapse of the family.

you are the one who judges , but no one asked you to be a judge and you clearly don’t have the authority to do so.
And yes. In the destruction of a relationship, both parties are always to blame, and never just one.

[Keep the change for yourself]

Marinka, ◊_NeBo[_Na_]LaDoNi_◊, girls, don’t quarrel, please, better have a French kiss)

[The passage]

this is his business, not yours . Are you going to judge him?.. don’t remember the biblical wisdom: “Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.” Somehow, I doubt that you have a halo over your head and I don’t see angel wings behind your back.

A person in my thread left a post about his wife and naturally I had questions. These questions are likely to turn things around. His story was not just an excuse for his vile act, but also an undeserved accusation of his wife. Cowardly people always do this. For himself, let him think as he wants, but there is no need to deceive us here.
If this is not so, then he will write about his work, about his friends, and we will understand that both are to blame for the collapse of the family.

you are the one who judges , but no one asked you to be a judge and you clearly don’t have the authority to do so.
And yes. In the destruction of relationships, both parties are always to blame, but only one is to blame.

Well, call a handsome man who cheated on his wife, then you are here to defend him is there a right? Did someone ask you to do this? Or do you have authority?
And where did you get the idea that both are always to blame? Have you conducted such research or has someone done it?

[◊_NeBo[_Na_]LaDoNi_◊]

A person in my thread left a post about his wife and naturally I had questions. These questions are likely to turn things around. His story was not just an excuse for his vile act, but also an undeserved accusation of his wife. Cowardly people always do this. For himself, let him think as he wants, but there is no need to deceive us here.
If this is not so, then he will write about his work, about his friends, and we will understand that both are to blame for the collapse of the family.

you are the one who judges , but no one asked you to be a judge and you clearly don’t have the authority to do so.
And yes. In the destruction of relationships, both parties are always to blame, but only one is to blame.

Well, call a handsome man who cheated on his wife, then you are here to defend him is there a right? Did someone ask you to do this? Or do you have authority?
And where did you get the idea that both are always to blame? Have you conducted such research or has someone done it?

I complimented him.. does this require some kind of special permission?
Relationships are built by both people and responsibility for them are shared equally.

[The passage]

you judge, but you no one asked to be a judge and you clearly don’t have the authority to do so.
And yes. In the destruction of relationships, both parties are always to blame, but only one is to blame.

Well, call a handsome man who cheated on his wife, then you are here to defend him is there a right? Did someone ask you to do this? Or do you have authority?
And where did you get the idea that both are always to blame? Have you conducted such research or has someone done it?

I complimented him.. does this require some kind of special permission?
Relationships are built by both people and are equally responsible for them.

And, I asked a few questions to make the situation clear. Do you need to ask permission for this?
Responsibility for a relationship and the reason for breaking a relationship are two different things.
At work we have collective financial responsibility, but if a person steals, then the team is not to blame. Right?

[Let’s]

Everything turned out very interesting for him. He cheated for a year and a half, but blamed his wife for the collapse of the family.

I didn’t blame my wife for the collapse)) where did you read that? I described the approximate course of events... Without going into details. And he honestly wrote that yes, I had a mistress about whom, at the very first conversation, I told it like it is. because at that moment saving the marriage no longer mattered to me. And yes, in the divorce itself I am the initiator. I do not absolve myself of responsibility, because family and marriage are a joint venture and not a one-sided game.

Without answers to my questions, the situation is incomprehensible . There are few questions, answers to them will take one minute. Please answer

Well, the question was not about my relationship, but what kind of woman would you marry)) but I will answer well.
When we met , he worked as a cashier in a store, I worked as a roofer. Then she became a senior cashier, then an accountant, then a chief accountant, where she still works today. During this time, I worked as a roofer, and at 25 I went to get a higher education. After being a roofer, I went to the metro construction, then to a meat processing plant, she didn’t like all these jobs, because she had to work with her head and not with her hands. I went to the tower and in my second year at the institute, I left the meat plant. left production for the office to become an assistant system administrator, and then to a full-fledged administrator. But she didn’t like this company because it was a “sharashkin’s office” and then it turned out that the system administrator is also a so-so profession, because at their job programmers get paid wow.. At every opportunity, she shoved these programmers into the example . But not everyone is born a programmer, and not everyone even has the desire to be one. Yes, she wanted her husband (that is, me) to have a prestigious profession, a large salary... Probably so that, against the background of her chief accounting, her husband would be on an equal footing, but there is one thing in all this, as I wrote above. She believed that I needed this, regardless of my personal opinion: do I want to be a programmer? Yes, I started studying programming.. I started 5 times.. I still work as administrators to this day. . And she didn’t like her friends for one reason - they are from my production - they don’t develop and pull me down... I need to communicate with the dudes from her work, programmers, in order to pull myself up. Why does she think they are stupid? because they are at the factory and don’t want to change anything in their lives.. And not because they are drunks or drug addicts.. No. Just hard workers. I hope I answered?
Although I didn’t really want to answer these questions.

[◊_NeBo[_Na_]LaDoNi_◊]

Well, calling a handsome man who cheated on his wife, then Do you have the right to defend him here? Did someone ask you to do this? Or do you have authority?
And where did you get the idea that both are always to blame? Have you conducted such research or has someone done it?

I complimented him.. does this require some kind of special permission?
Relationships are built by both people and are equally responsible for them.

And, I asked a few questions to make the situation clear. Do you need to ask permission for this?
Responsibility for a relationship and the reason for breaking a relationship are two different things.
At work we have collective financial responsibility, but if a person steals, then the team is not to blame. Right?

yes, in psychology, before asking questions, the specialist asks permission. Especially when these are not just a few questions, but a whole list)) your main problem is that you don’t know how to give in and admit your mistakes... well, I hope life will teach you this over time)
Work team and family should not be compared. This is comparing an ass to a finger.

[Let’s]

Don’t swear and don’t quarrel.. In any case, drawing conclusions about who is to blame based on 20 lines of text is not correct)) I put 10 years of life into 20 lines.. It’s not real))
I can say one thing . That I communicate well with both my son and daughter (stepdaughter), they are already adults. My daughter and I text each other every day. Including at the moment. In a cart. They know the situation from the inside and this is probably an indicator that it’s not only me who is to blame. Since they still communicate with me.

[◊_NeBo[_Na_]LaDoNi_◊]

Don’t swear and don’t quarrel.. In any case, drawing conclusions about who is to blame based on 20 lines of text is not correct)) I put 10 years of life into 20 lines.. This is not real))
nI can say one thing. That I communicate well with both my son and daughter (stepdaughter), they are already adults. My daughter and I text each other every day. Including at the moment. In a cart. They know the situation from the inside and this is probably an indicator that it’s not only me who is to blame. Since they still communicate with me.

at Marinka you are already to blame)

[The passage]

I complimented him.. on does this require some kind of special permission?
Relationships are built by both people and they bear equal responsibility for them.

And, I asked a few questions so that the situation becomes clear. Do you need to ask permission for this?
Responsibility for a relationship and the reason for breaking a relationship are two different things.
At work we have collective financial responsibility, but if a person steals, then the team is not to blame. Right?

yes, in psychology, before asking questions, the specialist asks permission. Especially when these are not just a few questions, but a whole list)) your main problem is that you don’t know how to give in and admit your mistakes... well, I hope life will teach you this over time)
Work team and family should not be compared. This is a comparison of an ass with a finger.

))) You are confused, you are not here at an appointment with a psychologist.

Five questions are not a whole list. He didn’t answer them because I was right.

Sent after 14 minutes 14 seconds:

this is an indicator that I am not the only one to blame

You write about work and friends. To make it clear that both are to blame.

[Wow]

I have two fundamental options: “I wouldn’t want to marry someone like that” and “I definitely won’t marry someone like that.”

As for the first “point,” I already had a case when I told my friends, no matter who you would NOT want to marry (since childhood, a collective image had already been formed), and gave a complete description of the woman, listing her interests, work and hobbies, and at the same time, like the icing on the cake, he added the final unacceptable “point”: if her father is a cop ... Moreover, I showed my friends an ad in the Dating section (in the newspaper) - as an example of a description of an UNsuitable wife.

And then, 8 years later, everything coincided down to the smallest detail: my wife’s appearance, profession, interests and hobbies + her father is a cop... In addition, that very advertisement turned out to be hers. She showed it, taking out a newspaper from her home archive.

But I met her simply by chance, in a completely strange company at a party-festival. More precisely... it was not I who met her, but she who met me. At first, in the first couple of days of our acquaintance, I still tried to carefully steer away from her, but without an objective reason - it was somehow inconvenient.

And about the second option: “I definitely won’t marry someone like that”...
I knew from childhood that I would absolutely never marry or even just get involved with someone. This rule of mine remains unshakable. I always steered away from those girls who I liked the most. Here I don’t look at “convenience” or “inconvenience” - I don’t care - I move away insolently - and I don’t care about the level of objectivity of the reason. Ergonomics and peace of mind are more important.

[The passage]

I have two fundamental options: “I wouldn’t want to marry someone like that” and “I definitely won’t marry someone like that.”

As for the first “point”, I already had a case when he told his friends who he would NOT want to marry (a collective image had already been formed since childhood), and gave a full description of the woman, listing her interests, work and hobbies, and at the same time, like the icing on the cake, he added the final unacceptable “point”: if she father is a cop... Moreover, I showed my friends an ad in the Dating section (in the newspaper) - as an example of a description of an UNsuitable wife.

And then, 8 years later, everything coincided down to the smallest detail: my wife’s appearance, profession, interests and hobbies + her father is a cop... In addition, that very advertisement turned out to be hers. She showed it, taking out a newspaper from her home archive.

But I met her simply by chance, in a completely strange company at a party-festival. More precisely... it was not I who met her, but she who met me. At first, in the first couple of days of our acquaintance, I still tried to carefully steer away from her, but without an objective reason - it was somehow inconvenient.

And about the second option: “I definitely won’t marry someone like that”...
I knew from childhood that I would absolutely never marry or even just get involved with someone. This rule of mine remains unshakable. I always steered away from those girls who I liked the most. Here I don’t look at “convenience” or “inconvenience” - I don’t care - I move away insolently - and I don’t care about the level of objectivity of the reason. Ergonomics of peace is more important.

I understood little of what you wrote, and where I did understand, I did not see the logic.

[◊_NeBo[_Na_]LaDoNi_◊]

And, I asked a few questions to make the situation clear. Do you need to ask permission for this?
Responsibility for a relationship and the reason for breaking a relationship are two different things.
At work we have collective financial responsibility, but if a person steals, then the team is not to blame. Right?

yes, in psychology, before asking questions, the specialist asks permission. Especially when these are not just a few questions, but a whole list)) your main problem is that you don’t know how to give in and admit your mistakes... well, I hope life will teach you this over time)
Work team and family should not be compared. This is a comparison of an ass with a finger.

))) You are confused, you are not here at an appointment with a psychologist.

Five questions are not a whole list. He didn’t answer them because I was right.

Sent after 14 minutes 14 seconds:

this is an indicator that I am not the only one to blame

You write about work and friends. To make it clear that both are to blame.

not at the reception, but it wouldn’t hurt you to be tactful in dealing with people.
Well, of course.. who would doubt it... Marinka is always right)

[The passage]

yes, in psychology before how to ask questions, the specialist asks permission. Especially when these are not just a few questions, but a whole list)) your main problem is that you don’t know how to give in and admit your mistakes... well, I hope life will teach you this over time)
Work team and family should not be compared. This is a comparison of an ass with a finger.

))) You are confused, you are not here at an appointment with a psychologist.

Five questions are not a whole list. He didn’t answer them because I was right.

Sent after 14 minutes 14 seconds:

this is an indicator that I am not the only one to blame

You write about work and friends. To make it clear that both are to blame.

not at the reception, but it wouldn’t hurt you to be tactful in dealing with people.
Well, of course.. who would doubt it.. Marinka is always right)

And what was not tactful in my message that you found fault with? Could you show it?

[◊_NeBo[_Na_]LaDoNi_◊]

))) You are confused, you are not here at an appointment with a psychologist.

Five questions are not a whole list. He didn’t answer them because I was right.

Sent after 14 minutes 14 seconds: You will write about work and friends. To make it clear that both are to blame.

not at the reception, but it wouldn’t hurt you to be tactful in dealing with people.
Well, of course.. who would doubt it.. Marinka is always right)

And what was not tactful in my message that you found fault with? Can you show me?

I didn’t find fault, but commented. Secondly: what does it matter if you are still right and smarter than everyone else, and the rest are idiots?.. you will still reduce our dialogue to this again. I saved you the trouble, I wrote your favorite speech for you.

[Let’s]

He didn’t answer them because I was right.

How did he not? I think he answered in detail))

[The passage]

not at the reception, but be tactful It wouldn’t hurt you to communicate with people.
Well, of course.. who would doubt it.. Marinka is always right)

And what Was there something tactless in my message that you found fault with? Can you show me?

I didn’t find fault, but commented. Secondly: what does it matter if you are still right and smarter than everyone else, and the rest are idiots?.. you will still reduce our dialogue to this again. I saved you the trouble, I wrote your favorite speech for you.

Well, you commented with such with a dose of irony and such sarcasm that it was impossible not to answer. It’s a pity that you didn’t write anything intelligible.
Have you heard about the Dunning-Kruger effect? The behavior of you and those like you is well described there.
Not everyone here is an idiot, but it’s the idiots who comment on my posts, then avoid answering and get offended. You understand, it’s not my fault for your low intellectual level and it’s not my fault that you have an inflated self-esteem

Sent after 3 minutes 46 seconds:

He didn’t answer them because I was right.

How did it not happen? I think I answered in detail))

You mentioned work and your friends. This, in your opinion, was the beginning of a break in relations. So I asked you where your wife worked, where you worked, the first and second time. She didn’t like your work. Well, write about your friends too. We need to understand that she was wrong, or, on the contrary, that she was right.
You haven’t mentioned anything else.

[Let’s]

So I asked you where your wife worked, where you worked, for the first and second time

Message at 13.08 (Moscow time).. And about work and about friends.. Read)) answered.

[RazVratnik]

You mentioned work and your friends. This, in your opinion, was the beginning of a break in relations. So I asked you where your wife worked, where you worked, the first and second time. She didn’t like your work. Well, write about your friends too. We need to understand that she was wrong, or, on the contrary, that she was right.
You didn’t mention anything else.

I think that even if he talks about his friends and work, no one has the right to decide for him whether they are good or not, whether he needs to change friends and work or not. This will be disrespect for the person both on our part and on the part of his wife.